Forensic criminology as a research problem: Using traditional processes in a forensic context

Wayne Petherick, Claire Ferguson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

We begin the chapter with this question: how does the work of practising criminologistsrelate to that of forensic criminologists? To answer this, we must understand first what forensic criminology is and how it – as a practical sub-branch of criminology –diverges from the more theoretical community. To understand why those studying crime and criminals need to be aware of what their forensic counterparts are doing, we also need to highlight the areas where forensic criminology is applied. This will introduce our argument for how forensic criminology uses well-known criminological research concepts and methods in a forensic capacity in order to educate and answer questions for stakeholders working in the criminal justice system. We will explain, using examples, the methods used by forensic criminologists to apply theoretical knowledge to the study of individuals, including differentiating between inductive and deductive logic. We will describe how forensic criminologists use structured professional judgement as aresearch method to make conclusions, which are of practical use to investigators, advocates and the court. Finally, we will compare and contrast how research in forensic criminology relates to more traditional endeavours, highlighting the different role that theory plays in the development of research questions across the two branches of the discipline.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLiquid criminology
Subtitle of host publicationDoing imaginative criminological research
EditorsS Walklate, M H Jacobsen
Place of PublicationUnited Kingdom
PublisherTaylor & Francis
Pages65-78
Number of pages14
ISBN (Electronic)9781317104834
ISBN (Print)9781472455239
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016

Fingerprint

criminology
role theory
logic
justice
stakeholder
offense
community

Cite this

Petherick, W., & Ferguson, C. (2016). Forensic criminology as a research problem: Using traditional processes in a forensic context. In S. Walklate, & M. H. Jacobsen (Eds.), Liquid criminology: Doing imaginative criminological research (pp. 65-78). United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315592503
Petherick, Wayne ; Ferguson, Claire. / Forensic criminology as a research problem : Using traditional processes in a forensic context. Liquid criminology: Doing imaginative criminological research. editor / S Walklate ; M H Jacobsen. United Kingdom : Taylor & Francis, 2016. pp. 65-78
@inbook{1d62fa31b7594f7b827bfd535de3a0fe,
title = "Forensic criminology as a research problem: Using traditional processes in a forensic context",
abstract = "We begin the chapter with this question: how does the work of practising criminologistsrelate to that of forensic criminologists? To answer this, we must understand first what forensic criminology is and how it – as a practical sub-branch of criminology –diverges from the more theoretical community. To understand why those studying crime and criminals need to be aware of what their forensic counterparts are doing, we also need to highlight the areas where forensic criminology is applied. This will introduce our argument for how forensic criminology uses well-known criminological research concepts and methods in a forensic capacity in order to educate and answer questions for stakeholders working in the criminal justice system. We will explain, using examples, the methods used by forensic criminologists to apply theoretical knowledge to the study of individuals, including differentiating between inductive and deductive logic. We will describe how forensic criminologists use structured professional judgement as aresearch method to make conclusions, which are of practical use to investigators, advocates and the court. Finally, we will compare and contrast how research in forensic criminology relates to more traditional endeavours, highlighting the different role that theory plays in the development of research questions across the two branches of the discipline.",
author = "Wayne Petherick and Claire Ferguson",
note = "DOI leads to host publication (Scholarly Edition: Edited Book)",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9781315592503",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781472455239",
pages = "65--78",
editor = "S Walklate and Jacobsen, {M H}",
booktitle = "Liquid criminology",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Petherick, W & Ferguson, C 2016, Forensic criminology as a research problem: Using traditional processes in a forensic context. in S Walklate & MH Jacobsen (eds), Liquid criminology: Doing imaginative criminological research. Taylor & Francis, United Kingdom, pp. 65-78. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315592503

Forensic criminology as a research problem : Using traditional processes in a forensic context. / Petherick, Wayne; Ferguson, Claire.

Liquid criminology: Doing imaginative criminological research. ed. / S Walklate; M H Jacobsen. United Kingdom : Taylor & Francis, 2016. p. 65-78.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Forensic criminology as a research problem

T2 - Using traditional processes in a forensic context

AU - Petherick, Wayne

AU - Ferguson, Claire

N1 - DOI leads to host publication (Scholarly Edition: Edited Book)

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - We begin the chapter with this question: how does the work of practising criminologistsrelate to that of forensic criminologists? To answer this, we must understand first what forensic criminology is and how it – as a practical sub-branch of criminology –diverges from the more theoretical community. To understand why those studying crime and criminals need to be aware of what their forensic counterparts are doing, we also need to highlight the areas where forensic criminology is applied. This will introduce our argument for how forensic criminology uses well-known criminological research concepts and methods in a forensic capacity in order to educate and answer questions for stakeholders working in the criminal justice system. We will explain, using examples, the methods used by forensic criminologists to apply theoretical knowledge to the study of individuals, including differentiating between inductive and deductive logic. We will describe how forensic criminologists use structured professional judgement as aresearch method to make conclusions, which are of practical use to investigators, advocates and the court. Finally, we will compare and contrast how research in forensic criminology relates to more traditional endeavours, highlighting the different role that theory plays in the development of research questions across the two branches of the discipline.

AB - We begin the chapter with this question: how does the work of practising criminologistsrelate to that of forensic criminologists? To answer this, we must understand first what forensic criminology is and how it – as a practical sub-branch of criminology –diverges from the more theoretical community. To understand why those studying crime and criminals need to be aware of what their forensic counterparts are doing, we also need to highlight the areas where forensic criminology is applied. This will introduce our argument for how forensic criminology uses well-known criminological research concepts and methods in a forensic capacity in order to educate and answer questions for stakeholders working in the criminal justice system. We will explain, using examples, the methods used by forensic criminologists to apply theoretical knowledge to the study of individuals, including differentiating between inductive and deductive logic. We will describe how forensic criminologists use structured professional judgement as aresearch method to make conclusions, which are of practical use to investigators, advocates and the court. Finally, we will compare and contrast how research in forensic criminology relates to more traditional endeavours, highlighting the different role that theory plays in the development of research questions across the two branches of the discipline.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021988578&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781315592503

DO - 10.4324/9781315592503

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781472455239

SP - 65

EP - 78

BT - Liquid criminology

A2 - Walklate, S

A2 - Jacobsen, M H

PB - Taylor & Francis

CY - United Kingdom

ER -

Petherick W, Ferguson C. Forensic criminology as a research problem: Using traditional processes in a forensic context. In Walklate S, Jacobsen MH, editors, Liquid criminology: Doing imaginative criminological research. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis. 2016. p. 65-78 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315592503