Foot orthoses and physiotherapy in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome: Randomised clinical trial

Natalie Collins, Kay Crossley, Elaine Beller, Ross Darnell, Thomas McPoil, Bill Vicenzino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

115 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of foot orthoses in the management of patellofemoral pain syndrome with flat inserts or physiotherapy, and to investigate the effectiveness of foot orthoses plus physiotherapy.

Design Prospective, single blind, randomised clinical trial.

Setting Single centre trial within a community setting in Brisbane, Australia.

Participants 179 participants ( 100 women) aged 18 to 40 years, with a clinical diagnosis of patellofemoral pain syndrome of greater than six weeks' duration, who had no previous treatment with foot orthoses or physiotherapy in the preceding 12 months.

Interventions Six weeks of physiotherapist intervention with off the shelf foot orthoses, flat inserts, multimodal physiotherapy ( patellofemoral joint mobilisation, patellar taping, quadriceps muscle retraining, and education), or foot orthoses plus physiotherapy.

Main outcome measures Global improvement, severity of usual and worst pain over the preceding week, anterior knee pain scale, and functional index questionnaire measured at 6, 12, and 52 weeks.

Results Foot orthoses produced improvementbeyond that of flat inserts in the short term, notably at six weeks ( relative risk reduction 0.66, 99% confidence interval 0.05 to 1.17; NNT 4 ( 99% confidence interval 2 to 51). No significant differences were found between foot orthoses and physiotherapy, or between physiotherapy and physiotherapy plus orthoses. All groups showed clinically meaningful improvements in primary outcomes over 52 weeks.

Conclusion While foot orthoses are superior to flat inserts according to participants' overall perception, they are similar to physiotherapy and do not improve outcomes when added to physiotherapy in the short term management of patellofemoral pain. Given the long term improvement observed in all treatment groups, general practitioners may seek to hasten recovery by prescribing prefabricated orthoses.

Trial registration Australian Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN012605000463673 and ClinicalTrials. gov NCT00118521.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1735
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Medical Journal
Volume337
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2008
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Collins, Natalie ; Crossley, Kay ; Beller, Elaine ; Darnell, Ross ; McPoil, Thomas ; Vicenzino, Bill. / Foot orthoses and physiotherapy in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome : Randomised clinical trial. In: British Medical Journal. 2008 ; Vol. 337.
@article{84b3458021e94f6aacdb43c03aff4390,
title = "Foot orthoses and physiotherapy in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome: Randomised clinical trial",
abstract = "Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of foot orthoses in the management of patellofemoral pain syndrome with flat inserts or physiotherapy, and to investigate the effectiveness of foot orthoses plus physiotherapy.Design Prospective, single blind, randomised clinical trial.Setting Single centre trial within a community setting in Brisbane, Australia.Participants 179 participants ( 100 women) aged 18 to 40 years, with a clinical diagnosis of patellofemoral pain syndrome of greater than six weeks' duration, who had no previous treatment with foot orthoses or physiotherapy in the preceding 12 months.Interventions Six weeks of physiotherapist intervention with off the shelf foot orthoses, flat inserts, multimodal physiotherapy ( patellofemoral joint mobilisation, patellar taping, quadriceps muscle retraining, and education), or foot orthoses plus physiotherapy.Main outcome measures Global improvement, severity of usual and worst pain over the preceding week, anterior knee pain scale, and functional index questionnaire measured at 6, 12, and 52 weeks.Results Foot orthoses produced improvementbeyond that of flat inserts in the short term, notably at six weeks ( relative risk reduction 0.66, 99{\%} confidence interval 0.05 to 1.17; NNT 4 ( 99{\%} confidence interval 2 to 51). No significant differences were found between foot orthoses and physiotherapy, or between physiotherapy and physiotherapy plus orthoses. All groups showed clinically meaningful improvements in primary outcomes over 52 weeks.Conclusion While foot orthoses are superior to flat inserts according to participants' overall perception, they are similar to physiotherapy and do not improve outcomes when added to physiotherapy in the short term management of patellofemoral pain. Given the long term improvement observed in all treatment groups, general practitioners may seek to hasten recovery by prescribing prefabricated orthoses.Trial registration Australian Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN012605000463673 and ClinicalTrials. gov NCT00118521.",
author = "Natalie Collins and Kay Crossley and Elaine Beller and Ross Darnell and Thomas McPoil and Bill Vicenzino",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmj.a1735",
language = "English",
volume = "337",
journal = "BMJ (Clinical research ed.)",
issn = "0959-535X",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

}

Foot orthoses and physiotherapy in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome : Randomised clinical trial. / Collins, Natalie; Crossley, Kay; Beller, Elaine; Darnell, Ross; McPoil, Thomas; Vicenzino, Bill.

In: British Medical Journal, Vol. 337, 1735, 01.11.2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Foot orthoses and physiotherapy in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome

T2 - Randomised clinical trial

AU - Collins, Natalie

AU - Crossley, Kay

AU - Beller, Elaine

AU - Darnell, Ross

AU - McPoil, Thomas

AU - Vicenzino, Bill

PY - 2008/11/1

Y1 - 2008/11/1

N2 - Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of foot orthoses in the management of patellofemoral pain syndrome with flat inserts or physiotherapy, and to investigate the effectiveness of foot orthoses plus physiotherapy.Design Prospective, single blind, randomised clinical trial.Setting Single centre trial within a community setting in Brisbane, Australia.Participants 179 participants ( 100 women) aged 18 to 40 years, with a clinical diagnosis of patellofemoral pain syndrome of greater than six weeks' duration, who had no previous treatment with foot orthoses or physiotherapy in the preceding 12 months.Interventions Six weeks of physiotherapist intervention with off the shelf foot orthoses, flat inserts, multimodal physiotherapy ( patellofemoral joint mobilisation, patellar taping, quadriceps muscle retraining, and education), or foot orthoses plus physiotherapy.Main outcome measures Global improvement, severity of usual and worst pain over the preceding week, anterior knee pain scale, and functional index questionnaire measured at 6, 12, and 52 weeks.Results Foot orthoses produced improvementbeyond that of flat inserts in the short term, notably at six weeks ( relative risk reduction 0.66, 99% confidence interval 0.05 to 1.17; NNT 4 ( 99% confidence interval 2 to 51). No significant differences were found between foot orthoses and physiotherapy, or between physiotherapy and physiotherapy plus orthoses. All groups showed clinically meaningful improvements in primary outcomes over 52 weeks.Conclusion While foot orthoses are superior to flat inserts according to participants' overall perception, they are similar to physiotherapy and do not improve outcomes when added to physiotherapy in the short term management of patellofemoral pain. Given the long term improvement observed in all treatment groups, general practitioners may seek to hasten recovery by prescribing prefabricated orthoses.Trial registration Australian Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN012605000463673 and ClinicalTrials. gov NCT00118521.

AB - Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of foot orthoses in the management of patellofemoral pain syndrome with flat inserts or physiotherapy, and to investigate the effectiveness of foot orthoses plus physiotherapy.Design Prospective, single blind, randomised clinical trial.Setting Single centre trial within a community setting in Brisbane, Australia.Participants 179 participants ( 100 women) aged 18 to 40 years, with a clinical diagnosis of patellofemoral pain syndrome of greater than six weeks' duration, who had no previous treatment with foot orthoses or physiotherapy in the preceding 12 months.Interventions Six weeks of physiotherapist intervention with off the shelf foot orthoses, flat inserts, multimodal physiotherapy ( patellofemoral joint mobilisation, patellar taping, quadriceps muscle retraining, and education), or foot orthoses plus physiotherapy.Main outcome measures Global improvement, severity of usual and worst pain over the preceding week, anterior knee pain scale, and functional index questionnaire measured at 6, 12, and 52 weeks.Results Foot orthoses produced improvementbeyond that of flat inserts in the short term, notably at six weeks ( relative risk reduction 0.66, 99% confidence interval 0.05 to 1.17; NNT 4 ( 99% confidence interval 2 to 51). No significant differences were found between foot orthoses and physiotherapy, or between physiotherapy and physiotherapy plus orthoses. All groups showed clinically meaningful improvements in primary outcomes over 52 weeks.Conclusion While foot orthoses are superior to flat inserts according to participants' overall perception, they are similar to physiotherapy and do not improve outcomes when added to physiotherapy in the short term management of patellofemoral pain. Given the long term improvement observed in all treatment groups, general practitioners may seek to hasten recovery by prescribing prefabricated orthoses.Trial registration Australian Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN012605000463673 and ClinicalTrials. gov NCT00118521.

U2 - 10.1136/bmj.a1735

DO - 10.1136/bmj.a1735

M3 - Article

VL - 337

JO - BMJ (Clinical research ed.)

JF - BMJ (Clinical research ed.)

SN - 0959-535X

M1 - 1735

ER -