Abstract
Although research indicates that juveniles should be found unfit to plead at a greater rate than adults, that is not the case in Queensland. This article presents data from a research project designed to explore potential reasons for this anomaly. The data from that project revealed that the main reason rests with legal practitioners who decide not to raise unfitness. Such a decision is usually either due to jurisdictional constraints or other strategic or pragmatic concerns. In this article, it is argued that the law on fitness to plead in Queensland is in need of reform to combat such practice. The article analyses the law in other Australian States and Territories and the recommendations from the Review of the Mental Health Act 2000 (Qld) in search of a better approach.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 40-52 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Criminal Law Journal |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Fitness to plead in Queensland’s youth justice system: The need for pragmatic reform'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Related Research Outputs
- 1 Other report
-
Juvenile Fitness for Trial in Queensland: Formal Report
O'Leary, J., Watt, B. D. & O'Toole, S., 27 Aug 2014, 21 p.Research output: Book/Report › Other report › Research
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver