Family refusals of registered consents: The disruption of organ donation by double-standard surrogate decision-making

K. A. Bramstedt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Some countries such as Australia, Spain, Norway, Italy and Canada allow next of kin to override the consent of registered organ donor candidates if they personally do not concur with the donation desire of their relative. This form of surrogate decision-making represents a double standard in terms of the principle of substituted judgment (the surrogate's duty). Further, double-standard surrogate decision-making in the setting of organ donation is a slippery slope to unethical surrogate decision-making while patients are alive. Concerns about family distress and donor candidate revocation of consent can still be managed without permitting double-standard surrogate decision-making.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)120-123
Number of pages4
JournalInternal Medicine Journal
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2013

Fingerprint

Tissue and Organ Procurement
Decision Making
Tissue Donors
Norway
Spain
Italy
Canada

Cite this

@article{a8dec40b7a3645e9a97e2e8701cc6a8b,
title = "Family refusals of registered consents: The disruption of organ donation by double-standard surrogate decision-making",
abstract = "Some countries such as Australia, Spain, Norway, Italy and Canada allow next of kin to override the consent of registered organ donor candidates if they personally do not concur with the donation desire of their relative. This form of surrogate decision-making represents a double standard in terms of the principle of substituted judgment (the surrogate's duty). Further, double-standard surrogate decision-making in the setting of organ donation is a slippery slope to unethical surrogate decision-making while patients are alive. Concerns about family distress and donor candidate revocation of consent can still be managed without permitting double-standard surrogate decision-making.",
author = "Bramstedt, {K. A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/imj.12029",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "120--123",
journal = "Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine",
issn = "1444-0903",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Family refusals of registered consents : The disruption of organ donation by double-standard surrogate decision-making. / Bramstedt, K. A.

In: Internal Medicine Journal, Vol. 43, No. 2, 02.2013, p. 120-123.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Family refusals of registered consents

T2 - The disruption of organ donation by double-standard surrogate decision-making

AU - Bramstedt, K. A.

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - Some countries such as Australia, Spain, Norway, Italy and Canada allow next of kin to override the consent of registered organ donor candidates if they personally do not concur with the donation desire of their relative. This form of surrogate decision-making represents a double standard in terms of the principle of substituted judgment (the surrogate's duty). Further, double-standard surrogate decision-making in the setting of organ donation is a slippery slope to unethical surrogate decision-making while patients are alive. Concerns about family distress and donor candidate revocation of consent can still be managed without permitting double-standard surrogate decision-making.

AB - Some countries such as Australia, Spain, Norway, Italy and Canada allow next of kin to override the consent of registered organ donor candidates if they personally do not concur with the donation desire of their relative. This form of surrogate decision-making represents a double standard in terms of the principle of substituted judgment (the surrogate's duty). Further, double-standard surrogate decision-making in the setting of organ donation is a slippery slope to unethical surrogate decision-making while patients are alive. Concerns about family distress and donor candidate revocation of consent can still be managed without permitting double-standard surrogate decision-making.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873731829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/imj.12029

DO - 10.1111/imj.12029

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 120

EP - 123

JO - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine

JF - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine

SN - 1444-0903

IS - 2

ER -