Abstract
Over the past 30 years, the use of family dispute resolution (FDR) to resolve post-separation family disputes in Australia has grown significantly. FDR is now effectively a required first step in post-separation parenting disputes that enter the family law system, and it is also increasingly being used in property matters. FDR has many benefits for the parties in dispute ζ it is a flexible, cost-effective, time-efficient, more humane, less adversarial way to manage and resolve post-separation disputes. FDR also supports party self-determination, empowering each of the parties to have a voice in determining the best arrangements for the family into the future. However, there are also many challenges in FDR practice - particularly in relation to the management of power imbalances arising as a result of domestic and family violence. This chapter explores the benefits and challenges of teaching FDR and calls for the introduction of a core compulsory family law subject at law school, which includes the principles of FDR theory and practice to ensure the job-readiness of law graduates in contemporary times.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Teaching Family Law Refections on Pedagogy and Practice |
| Editors | Henry Kha, Mark Henaghan |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| Chapter | 5 |
| Pages | 72-85 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781003312994 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781032321318 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2023 |
Publication series
| Name | Legal Pedagogy |
|---|
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Family dispute resolution: teaching the benefits and challenges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver