Factors influencing disclosures of statements of service performance of New Zealand local authorities

Prae Keerasuntonpong, Keitha Dunstan, Bhagwan Khanna

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose
    – The purpose of this paper is to provide an understanding of the influential factors that may affect disclosures in the statements of service performance (SSPs) on wastewater services by New Zealand local authorities.

    Design/methodology/approach
    – Drawing on neo-institutional sociology theory, coercive power from the authoritative requirements, the authors investigate the impact of this primary pressure on SSP reporting. A disclosure index is used to measure the level of correspondence of SSPs with the authoritative requirements. Based on prior research, influential factors were quantified to examine their association with the disclosures, using regression analysis.

    Findings
    – The results indicate that the coercive pressure alone, without the support of mimetic and normative pressures, has had little influence on disclosure practice, with the majority of local authorities not adhering to the authoritative requirements. Political competition, size of constituency, constituency sophistication, political visibility, staff availability, personal attributes of accounting staff and financial resource availability are identified as likely influential factors for the SSPs. Size, proxied by total assets, proves to be significantly associated with the SSP reporting correspondence.

    Research limitations/implications
    – The results from the analysis of wastewater disclosures may have limited generalizability to other activities’ disclosures. Nevertheless, wastewater services are considered a critical activity and are expected to be prepared with expertise. Therefore, it is likely that the reporting capability of wastewater services will extend to other activities’ disclosures.

    Practical implications
    – The findings reported provide evidence that the authoritative requirements for SSP reporting need further development, smaller local authorities and outsourcing local authorities need more assistance in preparing SSPs and audit reports can be more informative in identifying non-compliance with the authoritative requirements for SSPs.

    Originality/value
    – The paper investigates a range of factors that influence the SSP reporting by the New Zealand Government and opens new research opportunities for other influential factors. Such findings may provide further help to regulators and reporting entities in improving the SSP reporting practice
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)304 - 328
    Number of pages25
    JournalPacific Accounting Review
    Volume27
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 3 Aug 2015

    Fingerprint

    New Zealand
    Service performance
    Disclosure
    Influencing factors
    Local authorities
    Influential factors
    Waste water
    Staff
    Generalizability
    Sophistication
    Noncompliance
    Design methodology
    Expertise
    Political competition
    Influence factors
    Assets
    Visibility
    Financial resources
    Regression analysis
    Disclosure index

    Cite this

    @article{b7698e5caa0b4e159a6b6deb1730a094,
    title = "Factors influencing disclosures of statements of service performance of New Zealand local authorities",
    abstract = "Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to provide an understanding of the influential factors that may affect disclosures in the statements of service performance (SSPs) on wastewater services by New Zealand local authorities.Design/methodology/approach– Drawing on neo-institutional sociology theory, coercive power from the authoritative requirements, the authors investigate the impact of this primary pressure on SSP reporting. A disclosure index is used to measure the level of correspondence of SSPs with the authoritative requirements. Based on prior research, influential factors were quantified to examine their association with the disclosures, using regression analysis.Findings– The results indicate that the coercive pressure alone, without the support of mimetic and normative pressures, has had little influence on disclosure practice, with the majority of local authorities not adhering to the authoritative requirements. Political competition, size of constituency, constituency sophistication, political visibility, staff availability, personal attributes of accounting staff and financial resource availability are identified as likely influential factors for the SSPs. Size, proxied by total assets, proves to be significantly associated with the SSP reporting correspondence.Research limitations/implications– The results from the analysis of wastewater disclosures may have limited generalizability to other activities’ disclosures. Nevertheless, wastewater services are considered a critical activity and are expected to be prepared with expertise. Therefore, it is likely that the reporting capability of wastewater services will extend to other activities’ disclosures.Practical implications– The findings reported provide evidence that the authoritative requirements for SSP reporting need further development, smaller local authorities and outsourcing local authorities need more assistance in preparing SSPs and audit reports can be more informative in identifying non-compliance with the authoritative requirements for SSPs.Originality/value– The paper investigates a range of factors that influence the SSP reporting by the New Zealand Government and opens new research opportunities for other influential factors. Such findings may provide further help to regulators and reporting entities in improving the SSP reporting practice",
    author = "Prae Keerasuntonpong and Keitha Dunstan and Bhagwan Khanna",
    year = "2015",
    month = "8",
    day = "3",
    doi = "10.1108/PAR-02-2014-0005",
    language = "English",
    volume = "27",
    pages = "304 -- 328",
    journal = "Pacific Accounting Review",
    issn = "0114-0582",
    publisher = "Emerald",
    number = "3",

    }

    Factors influencing disclosures of statements of service performance of New Zealand local authorities. / Keerasuntonpong, Prae; Dunstan, Keitha; Khanna, Bhagwan.

    In: Pacific Accounting Review, Vol. 27, No. 3, 03.08.2015, p. 304 - 328 .

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Factors influencing disclosures of statements of service performance of New Zealand local authorities

    AU - Keerasuntonpong, Prae

    AU - Dunstan, Keitha

    AU - Khanna, Bhagwan

    PY - 2015/8/3

    Y1 - 2015/8/3

    N2 - Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to provide an understanding of the influential factors that may affect disclosures in the statements of service performance (SSPs) on wastewater services by New Zealand local authorities.Design/methodology/approach– Drawing on neo-institutional sociology theory, coercive power from the authoritative requirements, the authors investigate the impact of this primary pressure on SSP reporting. A disclosure index is used to measure the level of correspondence of SSPs with the authoritative requirements. Based on prior research, influential factors were quantified to examine their association with the disclosures, using regression analysis.Findings– The results indicate that the coercive pressure alone, without the support of mimetic and normative pressures, has had little influence on disclosure practice, with the majority of local authorities not adhering to the authoritative requirements. Political competition, size of constituency, constituency sophistication, political visibility, staff availability, personal attributes of accounting staff and financial resource availability are identified as likely influential factors for the SSPs. Size, proxied by total assets, proves to be significantly associated with the SSP reporting correspondence.Research limitations/implications– The results from the analysis of wastewater disclosures may have limited generalizability to other activities’ disclosures. Nevertheless, wastewater services are considered a critical activity and are expected to be prepared with expertise. Therefore, it is likely that the reporting capability of wastewater services will extend to other activities’ disclosures.Practical implications– The findings reported provide evidence that the authoritative requirements for SSP reporting need further development, smaller local authorities and outsourcing local authorities need more assistance in preparing SSPs and audit reports can be more informative in identifying non-compliance with the authoritative requirements for SSPs.Originality/value– The paper investigates a range of factors that influence the SSP reporting by the New Zealand Government and opens new research opportunities for other influential factors. Such findings may provide further help to regulators and reporting entities in improving the SSP reporting practice

    AB - Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to provide an understanding of the influential factors that may affect disclosures in the statements of service performance (SSPs) on wastewater services by New Zealand local authorities.Design/methodology/approach– Drawing on neo-institutional sociology theory, coercive power from the authoritative requirements, the authors investigate the impact of this primary pressure on SSP reporting. A disclosure index is used to measure the level of correspondence of SSPs with the authoritative requirements. Based on prior research, influential factors were quantified to examine their association with the disclosures, using regression analysis.Findings– The results indicate that the coercive pressure alone, without the support of mimetic and normative pressures, has had little influence on disclosure practice, with the majority of local authorities not adhering to the authoritative requirements. Political competition, size of constituency, constituency sophistication, political visibility, staff availability, personal attributes of accounting staff and financial resource availability are identified as likely influential factors for the SSPs. Size, proxied by total assets, proves to be significantly associated with the SSP reporting correspondence.Research limitations/implications– The results from the analysis of wastewater disclosures may have limited generalizability to other activities’ disclosures. Nevertheless, wastewater services are considered a critical activity and are expected to be prepared with expertise. Therefore, it is likely that the reporting capability of wastewater services will extend to other activities’ disclosures.Practical implications– The findings reported provide evidence that the authoritative requirements for SSP reporting need further development, smaller local authorities and outsourcing local authorities need more assistance in preparing SSPs and audit reports can be more informative in identifying non-compliance with the authoritative requirements for SSPs.Originality/value– The paper investigates a range of factors that influence the SSP reporting by the New Zealand Government and opens new research opportunities for other influential factors. Such findings may provide further help to regulators and reporting entities in improving the SSP reporting practice

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008970749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1108/PAR-02-2014-0005

    DO - 10.1108/PAR-02-2014-0005

    M3 - Article

    VL - 27

    SP - 304

    EP - 328

    JO - Pacific Accounting Review

    JF - Pacific Accounting Review

    SN - 0114-0582

    IS - 3

    ER -