FactCheck Q&A: Did government gun buybacks reduce the number of gun deaths in Australia?

David Bright, Terrence Goldsworthy (Guest editor), Don Weatherburn (Guest editor)

Research output: Contribution to journalOnline ResourceResearch

Abstract

[Extract] The mass shooting in Las Vegas earlier this month once again turned international attention to Australia’s strict gun laws.Just days after the shooting, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull announced Australians had handed in 51,000 illegal firearms during a three-month national firearms amnesty.On an episode of Q&A, audience member Diana Melham, who is executive director of the Sporting Shooters Association of Australia NSW branch, challenged former deputy prime minister Tim Fischer on the effectiveness of the gun buybacks he helped usher in as part of the Howard government’s sweeping gun reforms following the Port Arthur massacre in 1996.Melham said “research shows” the government-funded gun buybacks in 1996 and 2003 have had “no effect in reducing the number of firearms deaths”. Fischer responded that a “fair take” on the statistics would show there has been a reduction in gun deaths since the reforms were introduced and the buybacks took place.So, what does the research show?
Original languageEnglish
JournalThe Conversation
Publication statusPublished - 30 Oct 2017

Fingerprint

minister
death
amnesty
reform
massacre
director
statistics
Law

Cite this

@article{94f11aed971243b0842766eb2cce1204,
title = "FactCheck Q&A: Did government gun buybacks reduce the number of gun deaths in Australia?",
abstract = "[Extract] The mass shooting in Las Vegas earlier this month once again turned international attention to Australia’s strict gun laws.Just days after the shooting, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull announced Australians had handed in 51,000 illegal firearms during a three-month national firearms amnesty.On an episode of Q&A, audience member Diana Melham, who is executive director of the Sporting Shooters Association of Australia NSW branch, challenged former deputy prime minister Tim Fischer on the effectiveness of the gun buybacks he helped usher in as part of the Howard government’s sweeping gun reforms following the Port Arthur massacre in 1996.Melham said “research shows” the government-funded gun buybacks in 1996 and 2003 have had “no effect in reducing the number of firearms deaths”. Fischer responded that a “fair take” on the statistics would show there has been a reduction in gun deaths since the reforms were introduced and the buybacks took place.So, what does the research show?",
author = "David Bright and Terrence Goldsworthy and Don Weatherburn",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "30",
language = "English",
journal = "The Conversation",

}

FactCheck Q&A : Did government gun buybacks reduce the number of gun deaths in Australia? / Bright, David; Goldsworthy, Terrence (Guest editor); Weatherburn, Don (Guest editor).

In: The Conversation, 30.10.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalOnline ResourceResearch

TY - JOUR

T1 - FactCheck Q&A

T2 - Did government gun buybacks reduce the number of gun deaths in Australia?

AU - Bright, David

A2 - Goldsworthy, Terrence

A2 - Weatherburn, Don

PY - 2017/10/30

Y1 - 2017/10/30

N2 - [Extract] The mass shooting in Las Vegas earlier this month once again turned international attention to Australia’s strict gun laws.Just days after the shooting, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull announced Australians had handed in 51,000 illegal firearms during a three-month national firearms amnesty.On an episode of Q&A, audience member Diana Melham, who is executive director of the Sporting Shooters Association of Australia NSW branch, challenged former deputy prime minister Tim Fischer on the effectiveness of the gun buybacks he helped usher in as part of the Howard government’s sweeping gun reforms following the Port Arthur massacre in 1996.Melham said “research shows” the government-funded gun buybacks in 1996 and 2003 have had “no effect in reducing the number of firearms deaths”. Fischer responded that a “fair take” on the statistics would show there has been a reduction in gun deaths since the reforms were introduced and the buybacks took place.So, what does the research show?

AB - [Extract] The mass shooting in Las Vegas earlier this month once again turned international attention to Australia’s strict gun laws.Just days after the shooting, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull announced Australians had handed in 51,000 illegal firearms during a three-month national firearms amnesty.On an episode of Q&A, audience member Diana Melham, who is executive director of the Sporting Shooters Association of Australia NSW branch, challenged former deputy prime minister Tim Fischer on the effectiveness of the gun buybacks he helped usher in as part of the Howard government’s sweeping gun reforms following the Port Arthur massacre in 1996.Melham said “research shows” the government-funded gun buybacks in 1996 and 2003 have had “no effect in reducing the number of firearms deaths”. Fischer responded that a “fair take” on the statistics would show there has been a reduction in gun deaths since the reforms were introduced and the buybacks took place.So, what does the research show?

M3 - Online Resource

JO - The Conversation

JF - The Conversation

ER -