Abstract
The Australian National Mediator Standards state that ‘the purpose of a mediation process is to maximise participants’ decision making’. To achieve this, the dominant model of mediation practised in Australia – the facilitative model – ethically requires the mediator to be in an ‘outsider-impartial’ role,3 as opposed to an ‘insider-partial’ role. That is, mediation ethics require mediators to be impartial facilitators of the process in order to ensure that the content and outcome of the dispute are self-determined by the parties. In managing the process impartially, a mediator is expected to be fair, even-handed, unbiased and free of prejudice. A mediator who is coercive, who favours one party over another or who makes a decision for the parties is not impartial and thereby is said to violate the possibility of party self-determination.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Alternative Perspectives on Lawyers and Legal Ethics |
Subtitle of host publication | Reimagining the Profession |
Editors | Francesca Bartlett, Reid Mortensen, Kieran Tranter |
Publisher | Routledge |
Pages | 193-217 |
Number of pages | 25 |
ISBN (Print) | 0203846885, 9780203846889 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 16 Aug 2010 |
Externally published | Yes |