Exploration of firms' strategic control mechanisms in Australia and the United States: Implications for global governance structures

Keith Duncan, Timothy Kiessling, Michael Harvey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

How much ownership is enough to exert strategic control over partners in the global marketplace? Top management frequently will attempt to have strategic influence over partners when it comes to the strategic direction of the organization. The question becomes, "what gives one partner control over another, and where does that power come from in the relationship?" This research examines the issue of strategic control in organizations in Australia and the United States to determine how to control global relationships. The research found that: (1) ownership is positively related to the degree of strategic control; (2) directness of ownership is positively related to the degree of strategic control; (3) dispersion is negatively related to the degree of strategic control; (4) board membership is positively related to the degree of strategic control; and (5) strategic control between U.S. and Australian organizations/relationships is different.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)571-587
Number of pages17
JournalThunderbird International Business Review
Volume52
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2010

Fingerprint

global governance
ownership
firm
Control mechanism
Global governance
Governance structure
Strategic control
organization
Ownership

Cite this

@article{cc4399cc2ecc441a9760f24a68e22f89,
title = "Exploration of firms' strategic control mechanisms in Australia and the United States: Implications for global governance structures",
abstract = "How much ownership is enough to exert strategic control over partners in the global marketplace? Top management frequently will attempt to have strategic influence over partners when it comes to the strategic direction of the organization. The question becomes, {"}what gives one partner control over another, and where does that power come from in the relationship?{"} This research examines the issue of strategic control in organizations in Australia and the United States to determine how to control global relationships. The research found that: (1) ownership is positively related to the degree of strategic control; (2) directness of ownership is positively related to the degree of strategic control; (3) dispersion is negatively related to the degree of strategic control; (4) board membership is positively related to the degree of strategic control; and (5) strategic control between U.S. and Australian organizations/relationships is different.",
author = "Keith Duncan and Timothy Kiessling and Michael Harvey",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1002/tie.20380",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "571--587",
journal = "Thunderbird International Business Review",
issn = "0020-6652",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "6",

}

Exploration of firms' strategic control mechanisms in Australia and the United States : Implications for global governance structures. / Duncan, Keith; Kiessling, Timothy; Harvey, Michael.

In: Thunderbird International Business Review, Vol. 52, No. 6, 11.2010, p. 571-587.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploration of firms' strategic control mechanisms in Australia and the United States

T2 - Implications for global governance structures

AU - Duncan, Keith

AU - Kiessling, Timothy

AU - Harvey, Michael

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - How much ownership is enough to exert strategic control over partners in the global marketplace? Top management frequently will attempt to have strategic influence over partners when it comes to the strategic direction of the organization. The question becomes, "what gives one partner control over another, and where does that power come from in the relationship?" This research examines the issue of strategic control in organizations in Australia and the United States to determine how to control global relationships. The research found that: (1) ownership is positively related to the degree of strategic control; (2) directness of ownership is positively related to the degree of strategic control; (3) dispersion is negatively related to the degree of strategic control; (4) board membership is positively related to the degree of strategic control; and (5) strategic control between U.S. and Australian organizations/relationships is different.

AB - How much ownership is enough to exert strategic control over partners in the global marketplace? Top management frequently will attempt to have strategic influence over partners when it comes to the strategic direction of the organization. The question becomes, "what gives one partner control over another, and where does that power come from in the relationship?" This research examines the issue of strategic control in organizations in Australia and the United States to determine how to control global relationships. The research found that: (1) ownership is positively related to the degree of strategic control; (2) directness of ownership is positively related to the degree of strategic control; (3) dispersion is negatively related to the degree of strategic control; (4) board membership is positively related to the degree of strategic control; and (5) strategic control between U.S. and Australian organizations/relationships is different.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77958592101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/tie.20380

DO - 10.1002/tie.20380

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 571

EP - 587

JO - Thunderbird International Business Review

JF - Thunderbird International Business Review

SN - 0020-6652

IS - 6

ER -