Explaining why some students procrastinate successfully: Adaptive perfectionism and psychological capital as predictors

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Despite contrary observations in traditional literature, many students who procrastinate do so successfully – they are active and effective delayers in handling their own academic deadlines. Some research studies have supported a distinction between active (adaptive) and passive (traditional,dysfunctional) procrastination and found active procrastinators to be effective in time management and outcomes (cf., Chu & Choi, 2005). One recent study has examined the relationship between perfectionism, self-efficacy and academic procrastination but there are no studies examining psychological capital and its four component parts in relation to perfectionism and procrastination. We set out to examine this relationship and to differentiate outcomes (active vs passive procrastination) on the basis of the perfectionistic emphases (‘adaptive’ or ‘maladaptive’) and psychological capital as a whole - which involved four components- self-efficacy, resilience, optimism and hope. The current study employed the Luthans et al. (2007) Modified Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ: PsyCap). Would the total PsyCap as well as its four domains mediate the relationship between adaptive perfectionism and academic procrastination?.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 2015
EventAustralian Psychological Society College of Counselling Psychologists Annual Conference - , Australia
Duration: 26 Feb 20151 Mar 2015
Conference number: 2nd
https://groups.psychology.org.au/ccoun/conference2015/

Conference

ConferenceAustralian Psychological Society College of Counselling Psychologists Annual Conference
Abbreviated titleAPS conference
CountryAustralia
Period26/02/151/03/15
Internet address

Fingerprint

self-efficacy
time management
student
optimism
resilience
questionnaire
literature

Cite this

Hicks, R. E., & Wu, F. (2015). Explaining why some students procrastinate successfully: Adaptive perfectionism and psychological capital as predictors. Abstract from Australian Psychological Society College of Counselling Psychologists Annual Conference, Australia.
Hicks, Richard E. ; Wu, F. / Explaining why some students procrastinate successfully : Adaptive perfectionism and psychological capital as predictors. Abstract from Australian Psychological Society College of Counselling Psychologists Annual Conference, Australia.
@conference{915361c9ab7640ebada9f3d98b561274,
title = "Explaining why some students procrastinate successfully: Adaptive perfectionism and psychological capital as predictors",
abstract = "Despite contrary observations in traditional literature, many students who procrastinate do so successfully – they are active and effective delayers in handling their own academic deadlines. Some research studies have supported a distinction between active (adaptive) and passive (traditional,dysfunctional) procrastination and found active procrastinators to be effective in time management and outcomes (cf., Chu & Choi, 2005). One recent study has examined the relationship between perfectionism, self-efficacy and academic procrastination but there are no studies examining psychological capital and its four component parts in relation to perfectionism and procrastination. We set out to examine this relationship and to differentiate outcomes (active vs passive procrastination) on the basis of the perfectionistic emphases (‘adaptive’ or ‘maladaptive’) and psychological capital as a whole - which involved four components- self-efficacy, resilience, optimism and hope. The current study employed the Luthans et al. (2007) Modified Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ: PsyCap). Would the total PsyCap as well as its four domains mediate the relationship between adaptive perfectionism and academic procrastination?.",
author = "Hicks, {Richard E.} and F. Wu",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
note = "Australian Psychological Society College of Counselling Psychologists Annual Conference, APS conference ; Conference date: 26-02-2015 Through 01-03-2015",
url = "https://groups.psychology.org.au/ccoun/conference2015/",

}

Hicks, RE & Wu, F 2015, 'Explaining why some students procrastinate successfully: Adaptive perfectionism and psychological capital as predictors' Australian Psychological Society College of Counselling Psychologists Annual Conference, Australia, 26/02/15 - 1/03/15, .

Explaining why some students procrastinate successfully : Adaptive perfectionism and psychological capital as predictors. / Hicks, Richard E.; Wu, F.

2015. Abstract from Australian Psychological Society College of Counselling Psychologists Annual Conference, Australia.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractResearchpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - Explaining why some students procrastinate successfully

T2 - Adaptive perfectionism and psychological capital as predictors

AU - Hicks, Richard E.

AU - Wu, F.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Despite contrary observations in traditional literature, many students who procrastinate do so successfully – they are active and effective delayers in handling their own academic deadlines. Some research studies have supported a distinction between active (adaptive) and passive (traditional,dysfunctional) procrastination and found active procrastinators to be effective in time management and outcomes (cf., Chu & Choi, 2005). One recent study has examined the relationship between perfectionism, self-efficacy and academic procrastination but there are no studies examining psychological capital and its four component parts in relation to perfectionism and procrastination. We set out to examine this relationship and to differentiate outcomes (active vs passive procrastination) on the basis of the perfectionistic emphases (‘adaptive’ or ‘maladaptive’) and psychological capital as a whole - which involved four components- self-efficacy, resilience, optimism and hope. The current study employed the Luthans et al. (2007) Modified Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ: PsyCap). Would the total PsyCap as well as its four domains mediate the relationship between adaptive perfectionism and academic procrastination?.

AB - Despite contrary observations in traditional literature, many students who procrastinate do so successfully – they are active and effective delayers in handling their own academic deadlines. Some research studies have supported a distinction between active (adaptive) and passive (traditional,dysfunctional) procrastination and found active procrastinators to be effective in time management and outcomes (cf., Chu & Choi, 2005). One recent study has examined the relationship between perfectionism, self-efficacy and academic procrastination but there are no studies examining psychological capital and its four component parts in relation to perfectionism and procrastination. We set out to examine this relationship and to differentiate outcomes (active vs passive procrastination) on the basis of the perfectionistic emphases (‘adaptive’ or ‘maladaptive’) and psychological capital as a whole - which involved four components- self-efficacy, resilience, optimism and hope. The current study employed the Luthans et al. (2007) Modified Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ: PsyCap). Would the total PsyCap as well as its four domains mediate the relationship between adaptive perfectionism and academic procrastination?.

M3 - Abstract

ER -

Hicks RE, Wu F. Explaining why some students procrastinate successfully: Adaptive perfectionism and psychological capital as predictors. 2015. Abstract from Australian Psychological Society College of Counselling Psychologists Annual Conference, Australia.