"Experience Isn't Everything": How Emotion Affects the Relationship Between Experience and Cue Utilization

Monique Frances Crane, Sue Brouwers, Mark William Wiggins, Thomas Loveday, Kirsty Forrest, Suyin Giselle Marianne Tan, Allan Michael Cyna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This research examined whether negative and positive arousal emotions modify the relationship between experience level and cue utilization among anesthetists.

BACKGROUND: The capacity of a practitioner to form precise associations between clusters of features (e.g., symptoms) and events (e.g., diagnosis) and then act on them is known as cue utilization. A common assumption is that practice experience allows opportunities for cue acquisition and cue utilization. However, this relationship is often not borne out in research findings. This study investigates the role of emotional state in this relationship.

METHOD: An online tool (EXPERTise 2.0) was used to assess practitioner cue utilization for tasks relevant to anesthesia. The experience of positive and negative arousal emotions in the previous three days was measured, and emotion clusters were generated. Experience was measured as the composite of practice years and hours of practice experience. The moderating role of emotion on the relationship between experience and cue utilization was examined.

RESULTS: Data on 125 anesthetists (36% female) were included in the analysis. The predicted interaction between arousal emotions and the experience level emerged. In particular, post hoc analyses revealed that anxiety-related emotions facilitated the likelihood of high cue utilization in less experienced practitioners.

CONCLUSION: The findings suggest a role for emotions in cue use and suggest a functional role for normal range anxiety emotions in a simulated work-relevant task.

APPLICATION: This research illustrates the importance of understanding the potentially functional effects common negative arousal emotions may have on clinical performance, particularly for those with less experience.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)685-698
Number of pages14
JournalHuman Factors
Volume60
Issue number5
Early online date4 Apr 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018

Fingerprint

Cues
Emotions
emotion
utilization
Arousal
experience
Composite materials
Anxiety
Research
anxiety
Reference Values
Anesthesia
event
interaction
performance
Practice (Psychology)

Cite this

Crane, Monique Frances ; Brouwers, Sue ; Wiggins, Mark William ; Loveday, Thomas ; Forrest, Kirsty ; Tan, Suyin Giselle Marianne ; Cyna, Allan Michael. / "Experience Isn't Everything" : How Emotion Affects the Relationship Between Experience and Cue Utilization. In: Human Factors. 2018 ; Vol. 60, No. 5. pp. 685-698.
@article{d73dcada33104410a3840f1766d69f88,
title = "{"}Experience Isn't Everything{"}: How Emotion Affects the Relationship Between Experience and Cue Utilization",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: This research examined whether negative and positive arousal emotions modify the relationship between experience level and cue utilization among anesthetists.BACKGROUND: The capacity of a practitioner to form precise associations between clusters of features (e.g., symptoms) and events (e.g., diagnosis) and then act on them is known as cue utilization. A common assumption is that practice experience allows opportunities for cue acquisition and cue utilization. However, this relationship is often not borne out in research findings. This study investigates the role of emotional state in this relationship.METHOD: An online tool (EXPERTise 2.0) was used to assess practitioner cue utilization for tasks relevant to anesthesia. The experience of positive and negative arousal emotions in the previous three days was measured, and emotion clusters were generated. Experience was measured as the composite of practice years and hours of practice experience. The moderating role of emotion on the relationship between experience and cue utilization was examined.RESULTS: Data on 125 anesthetists (36{\%} female) were included in the analysis. The predicted interaction between arousal emotions and the experience level emerged. In particular, post hoc analyses revealed that anxiety-related emotions facilitated the likelihood of high cue utilization in less experienced practitioners.CONCLUSION: The findings suggest a role for emotions in cue use and suggest a functional role for normal range anxiety emotions in a simulated work-relevant task.APPLICATION: This research illustrates the importance of understanding the potentially functional effects common negative arousal emotions may have on clinical performance, particularly for those with less experience.",
author = "Crane, {Monique Frances} and Sue Brouwers and Wiggins, {Mark William} and Thomas Loveday and Kirsty Forrest and Tan, {Suyin Giselle Marianne} and Cyna, {Allan Michael}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1177/0018720818765800",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "685--698",
journal = "Human Factors",
issn = "0018-7208",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

"Experience Isn't Everything" : How Emotion Affects the Relationship Between Experience and Cue Utilization. / Crane, Monique Frances; Brouwers, Sue; Wiggins, Mark William; Loveday, Thomas; Forrest, Kirsty; Tan, Suyin Giselle Marianne; Cyna, Allan Michael.

In: Human Factors, Vol. 60, No. 5, 08.2018, p. 685-698.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Experience Isn't Everything"

T2 - How Emotion Affects the Relationship Between Experience and Cue Utilization

AU - Crane, Monique Frances

AU - Brouwers, Sue

AU - Wiggins, Mark William

AU - Loveday, Thomas

AU - Forrest, Kirsty

AU - Tan, Suyin Giselle Marianne

AU - Cyna, Allan Michael

PY - 2018/8

Y1 - 2018/8

N2 - OBJECTIVE: This research examined whether negative and positive arousal emotions modify the relationship between experience level and cue utilization among anesthetists.BACKGROUND: The capacity of a practitioner to form precise associations between clusters of features (e.g., symptoms) and events (e.g., diagnosis) and then act on them is known as cue utilization. A common assumption is that practice experience allows opportunities for cue acquisition and cue utilization. However, this relationship is often not borne out in research findings. This study investigates the role of emotional state in this relationship.METHOD: An online tool (EXPERTise 2.0) was used to assess practitioner cue utilization for tasks relevant to anesthesia. The experience of positive and negative arousal emotions in the previous three days was measured, and emotion clusters were generated. Experience was measured as the composite of practice years and hours of practice experience. The moderating role of emotion on the relationship between experience and cue utilization was examined.RESULTS: Data on 125 anesthetists (36% female) were included in the analysis. The predicted interaction between arousal emotions and the experience level emerged. In particular, post hoc analyses revealed that anxiety-related emotions facilitated the likelihood of high cue utilization in less experienced practitioners.CONCLUSION: The findings suggest a role for emotions in cue use and suggest a functional role for normal range anxiety emotions in a simulated work-relevant task.APPLICATION: This research illustrates the importance of understanding the potentially functional effects common negative arousal emotions may have on clinical performance, particularly for those with less experience.

AB - OBJECTIVE: This research examined whether negative and positive arousal emotions modify the relationship between experience level and cue utilization among anesthetists.BACKGROUND: The capacity of a practitioner to form precise associations between clusters of features (e.g., symptoms) and events (e.g., diagnosis) and then act on them is known as cue utilization. A common assumption is that practice experience allows opportunities for cue acquisition and cue utilization. However, this relationship is often not borne out in research findings. This study investigates the role of emotional state in this relationship.METHOD: An online tool (EXPERTise 2.0) was used to assess practitioner cue utilization for tasks relevant to anesthesia. The experience of positive and negative arousal emotions in the previous three days was measured, and emotion clusters were generated. Experience was measured as the composite of practice years and hours of practice experience. The moderating role of emotion on the relationship between experience and cue utilization was examined.RESULTS: Data on 125 anesthetists (36% female) were included in the analysis. The predicted interaction between arousal emotions and the experience level emerged. In particular, post hoc analyses revealed that anxiety-related emotions facilitated the likelihood of high cue utilization in less experienced practitioners.CONCLUSION: The findings suggest a role for emotions in cue use and suggest a functional role for normal range anxiety emotions in a simulated work-relevant task.APPLICATION: This research illustrates the importance of understanding the potentially functional effects common negative arousal emotions may have on clinical performance, particularly for those with less experience.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045043979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0018720818765800

DO - 10.1177/0018720818765800

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 685

EP - 698

JO - Human Factors

JF - Human Factors

SN - 0018-7208

IS - 5

ER -