Evolution, obesity, and why children so often choose the unhealthy eating option

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In recent decades obesity has become an increasing concern for governments and health organisations around the world. Changes in diet in modern conditions have led to our food environment being labelled "toxic" and "obesogenic", and are portrayed in marked contrast to the types of food environment in which humans evolved and are adapted to biologically. In this article I question whether the modern food environment is genuinely so different from those that humans evolved in, and whether domesticated animals, like humans, tend to become obese in conditions where food is plentiful. I continue by offering a model of eating behaviour based on the marginal value theorem. The model implies that many parents and public policy unwittingly encourage unhealthy diets by controlling or over-regulating children's diet: although it may feel counterintuitive to respond to the risk of obesity by allowing individuals to make choices rather than restricting their choices, a more relaxed and less regulated approach to food intake should allow appropriate modulation of food intake in conditions where food is plentiful. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)934-936
Number of pages3
JournalMedical Hypotheses
Volume74
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2010
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{a5cd95d513c341a1b44c2cc2e70ec88b,
title = "Evolution, obesity, and why children so often choose the unhealthy eating option",
abstract = "In recent decades obesity has become an increasing concern for governments and health organisations around the world. Changes in diet in modern conditions have led to our food environment being labelled {"}toxic{"} and {"}obesogenic{"}, and are portrayed in marked contrast to the types of food environment in which humans evolved and are adapted to biologically. In this article I question whether the modern food environment is genuinely so different from those that humans evolved in, and whether domesticated animals, like humans, tend to become obese in conditions where food is plentiful. I continue by offering a model of eating behaviour based on the marginal value theorem. The model implies that many parents and public policy unwittingly encourage unhealthy diets by controlling or over-regulating children's diet: although it may feel counterintuitive to respond to the risk of obesity by allowing individuals to make choices rather than restricting their choices, a more relaxed and less regulated approach to food intake should allow appropriate modulation of food intake in conditions where food is plentiful. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
author = "David Waynforth",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.mehy.2009.11.018",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "934--936",
journal = "Medical Hypotheses",
issn = "0306-9877",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "5",

}

Evolution, obesity, and why children so often choose the unhealthy eating option. / Waynforth, David.

In: Medical Hypotheses, Vol. 74, No. 5, 05.2010, p. 934-936.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evolution, obesity, and why children so often choose the unhealthy eating option

AU - Waynforth, David

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - In recent decades obesity has become an increasing concern for governments and health organisations around the world. Changes in diet in modern conditions have led to our food environment being labelled "toxic" and "obesogenic", and are portrayed in marked contrast to the types of food environment in which humans evolved and are adapted to biologically. In this article I question whether the modern food environment is genuinely so different from those that humans evolved in, and whether domesticated animals, like humans, tend to become obese in conditions where food is plentiful. I continue by offering a model of eating behaviour based on the marginal value theorem. The model implies that many parents and public policy unwittingly encourage unhealthy diets by controlling or over-regulating children's diet: although it may feel counterintuitive to respond to the risk of obesity by allowing individuals to make choices rather than restricting their choices, a more relaxed and less regulated approach to food intake should allow appropriate modulation of food intake in conditions where food is plentiful. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - In recent decades obesity has become an increasing concern for governments and health organisations around the world. Changes in diet in modern conditions have led to our food environment being labelled "toxic" and "obesogenic", and are portrayed in marked contrast to the types of food environment in which humans evolved and are adapted to biologically. In this article I question whether the modern food environment is genuinely so different from those that humans evolved in, and whether domesticated animals, like humans, tend to become obese in conditions where food is plentiful. I continue by offering a model of eating behaviour based on the marginal value theorem. The model implies that many parents and public policy unwittingly encourage unhealthy diets by controlling or over-regulating children's diet: although it may feel counterintuitive to respond to the risk of obesity by allowing individuals to make choices rather than restricting their choices, a more relaxed and less regulated approach to food intake should allow appropriate modulation of food intake in conditions where food is plentiful. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

U2 - 10.1016/j.mehy.2009.11.018

DO - 10.1016/j.mehy.2009.11.018

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 934

EP - 936

JO - Medical Hypotheses

JF - Medical Hypotheses

SN - 0306-9877

IS - 5

ER -