Evidence for non-communicable diseases: Analysis of Cochrane reviews and randomised trials by World Bank classification

C. Heneghan, C. Blacklock, R. Perera, R. Davis, A. Banerjee, P. Gill, S. Liew, L. Chamas, J. Hernandez, K. Mahtani, G. Hayward, S. Harrison, D. Lasserson, S. Mickan, C. Sellers, D. Carnes, K. Homer, L. Steed, J. Ross, N. Denny & 3 others C. Goyder, M. Thompson, A. Ward

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is increasing globally, with the greatest projected increases in low-income and middleincome countries. We sought to quantify the proportion of Cochrane evidence relating to NCDs derived from such countries. Methods: We searched the Cochrane database of systematic reviews for reviews relating to NCDs highlighted in the WHO NCD action plan (cardiovascular, cancers, diabetes and chronic respiratory diseases). We excluded reviews at the protocol stage and those that were repeated or had been withdrawn. For each review, two independent researchers extracted data relating to the country of the corresponding author and the number of trials and participants from countries, using the World Bank classification of gross national income per capita. Results: 797 reviews were analysed, with a reported total number of 12 340 trials and 10 937 306 participants. Of the corresponding authors 90% were from high-income countries (41% from the UK). Of the 746 reviews in which at least one trial had met the inclusion criteria, only 55% provided a summary of the country of included trials. Analysis of the 633 reviews in which country of trials could be established revealed that almost 90% of trials and over 80% of participants were from high-income countries. 438 (5%) trials including 1 145 013 (11.7%) participants were undertaken in low-middle income countries. We found that only 13 (0.15%) trials with 982 (0.01%) participants were undertaken in lowincome countries. Other than the five Cochrane NCD corresponding authors from South Africa, only one other corresponding author was from Africa (Gambia). Discussion: The overwhelming body of evidence for NCDs pertains to high-income countries, with only a small number of review authors based in low-income settings. As a consequence, there is an urgent need for research infrastructure and funding for the undertaking of high-quality trials in this area.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere003298
JournalBMJ Open
Volume3
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jul 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

United Nations
Gambia
South Africa
Chronic Disease
Research Personnel
Databases
Research
Neoplasms

Cite this

Heneghan, C., Blacklock, C., Perera, R., Davis, R., Banerjee, A., Gill, P., ... Ward, A. (2013). Evidence for non-communicable diseases: Analysis of Cochrane reviews and randomised trials by World Bank classification. BMJ Open, 3(7), [e003298]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003298
Heneghan, C. ; Blacklock, C. ; Perera, R. ; Davis, R. ; Banerjee, A. ; Gill, P. ; Liew, S. ; Chamas, L. ; Hernandez, J. ; Mahtani, K. ; Hayward, G. ; Harrison, S. ; Lasserson, D. ; Mickan, S. ; Sellers, C. ; Carnes, D. ; Homer, K. ; Steed, L. ; Ross, J. ; Denny, N. ; Goyder, C. ; Thompson, M. ; Ward, A. / Evidence for non-communicable diseases : Analysis of Cochrane reviews and randomised trials by World Bank classification. In: BMJ Open. 2013 ; Vol. 3, No. 7.
@article{06fdc59754e4444598e306edaa2a6f4f,
title = "Evidence for non-communicable diseases: Analysis of Cochrane reviews and randomised trials by World Bank classification",
abstract = "Introduction: Prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is increasing globally, with the greatest projected increases in low-income and middleincome countries. We sought to quantify the proportion of Cochrane evidence relating to NCDs derived from such countries. Methods: We searched the Cochrane database of systematic reviews for reviews relating to NCDs highlighted in the WHO NCD action plan (cardiovascular, cancers, diabetes and chronic respiratory diseases). We excluded reviews at the protocol stage and those that were repeated or had been withdrawn. For each review, two independent researchers extracted data relating to the country of the corresponding author and the number of trials and participants from countries, using the World Bank classification of gross national income per capita. Results: 797 reviews were analysed, with a reported total number of 12 340 trials and 10 937 306 participants. Of the corresponding authors 90{\%} were from high-income countries (41{\%} from the UK). Of the 746 reviews in which at least one trial had met the inclusion criteria, only 55{\%} provided a summary of the country of included trials. Analysis of the 633 reviews in which country of trials could be established revealed that almost 90{\%} of trials and over 80{\%} of participants were from high-income countries. 438 (5{\%}) trials including 1 145 013 (11.7{\%}) participants were undertaken in low-middle income countries. We found that only 13 (0.15{\%}) trials with 982 (0.01{\%}) participants were undertaken in lowincome countries. Other than the five Cochrane NCD corresponding authors from South Africa, only one other corresponding author was from Africa (Gambia). Discussion: The overwhelming body of evidence for NCDs pertains to high-income countries, with only a small number of review authors based in low-income settings. As a consequence, there is an urgent need for research infrastructure and funding for the undertaking of high-quality trials in this area.",
author = "C. Heneghan and C. Blacklock and R. Perera and R. Davis and A. Banerjee and P. Gill and S. Liew and L. Chamas and J. Hernandez and K. Mahtani and G. Hayward and S. Harrison and D. Lasserson and S. Mickan and C. Sellers and D. Carnes and K. Homer and L. Steed and J. Ross and N. Denny and C. Goyder and M. Thompson and A. Ward",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003298",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "7",

}

Heneghan, C, Blacklock, C, Perera, R, Davis, R, Banerjee, A, Gill, P, Liew, S, Chamas, L, Hernandez, J, Mahtani, K, Hayward, G, Harrison, S, Lasserson, D, Mickan, S, Sellers, C, Carnes, D, Homer, K, Steed, L, Ross, J, Denny, N, Goyder, C, Thompson, M & Ward, A 2013, 'Evidence for non-communicable diseases: Analysis of Cochrane reviews and randomised trials by World Bank classification' BMJ Open, vol. 3, no. 7, e003298. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003298

Evidence for non-communicable diseases : Analysis of Cochrane reviews and randomised trials by World Bank classification. / Heneghan, C.; Blacklock, C.; Perera, R.; Davis, R.; Banerjee, A.; Gill, P.; Liew, S.; Chamas, L.; Hernandez, J.; Mahtani, K.; Hayward, G.; Harrison, S.; Lasserson, D.; Mickan, S.; Sellers, C.; Carnes, D.; Homer, K.; Steed, L.; Ross, J.; Denny, N.; Goyder, C.; Thompson, M.; Ward, A.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 3, No. 7, e003298, 30.07.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence for non-communicable diseases

T2 - Analysis of Cochrane reviews and randomised trials by World Bank classification

AU - Heneghan, C.

AU - Blacklock, C.

AU - Perera, R.

AU - Davis, R.

AU - Banerjee, A.

AU - Gill, P.

AU - Liew, S.

AU - Chamas, L.

AU - Hernandez, J.

AU - Mahtani, K.

AU - Hayward, G.

AU - Harrison, S.

AU - Lasserson, D.

AU - Mickan, S.

AU - Sellers, C.

AU - Carnes, D.

AU - Homer, K.

AU - Steed, L.

AU - Ross, J.

AU - Denny, N.

AU - Goyder, C.

AU - Thompson, M.

AU - Ward, A.

PY - 2013/7/30

Y1 - 2013/7/30

N2 - Introduction: Prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is increasing globally, with the greatest projected increases in low-income and middleincome countries. We sought to quantify the proportion of Cochrane evidence relating to NCDs derived from such countries. Methods: We searched the Cochrane database of systematic reviews for reviews relating to NCDs highlighted in the WHO NCD action plan (cardiovascular, cancers, diabetes and chronic respiratory diseases). We excluded reviews at the protocol stage and those that were repeated or had been withdrawn. For each review, two independent researchers extracted data relating to the country of the corresponding author and the number of trials and participants from countries, using the World Bank classification of gross national income per capita. Results: 797 reviews were analysed, with a reported total number of 12 340 trials and 10 937 306 participants. Of the corresponding authors 90% were from high-income countries (41% from the UK). Of the 746 reviews in which at least one trial had met the inclusion criteria, only 55% provided a summary of the country of included trials. Analysis of the 633 reviews in which country of trials could be established revealed that almost 90% of trials and over 80% of participants were from high-income countries. 438 (5%) trials including 1 145 013 (11.7%) participants were undertaken in low-middle income countries. We found that only 13 (0.15%) trials with 982 (0.01%) participants were undertaken in lowincome countries. Other than the five Cochrane NCD corresponding authors from South Africa, only one other corresponding author was from Africa (Gambia). Discussion: The overwhelming body of evidence for NCDs pertains to high-income countries, with only a small number of review authors based in low-income settings. As a consequence, there is an urgent need for research infrastructure and funding for the undertaking of high-quality trials in this area.

AB - Introduction: Prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is increasing globally, with the greatest projected increases in low-income and middleincome countries. We sought to quantify the proportion of Cochrane evidence relating to NCDs derived from such countries. Methods: We searched the Cochrane database of systematic reviews for reviews relating to NCDs highlighted in the WHO NCD action plan (cardiovascular, cancers, diabetes and chronic respiratory diseases). We excluded reviews at the protocol stage and those that were repeated or had been withdrawn. For each review, two independent researchers extracted data relating to the country of the corresponding author and the number of trials and participants from countries, using the World Bank classification of gross national income per capita. Results: 797 reviews were analysed, with a reported total number of 12 340 trials and 10 937 306 participants. Of the corresponding authors 90% were from high-income countries (41% from the UK). Of the 746 reviews in which at least one trial had met the inclusion criteria, only 55% provided a summary of the country of included trials. Analysis of the 633 reviews in which country of trials could be established revealed that almost 90% of trials and over 80% of participants were from high-income countries. 438 (5%) trials including 1 145 013 (11.7%) participants were undertaken in low-middle income countries. We found that only 13 (0.15%) trials with 982 (0.01%) participants were undertaken in lowincome countries. Other than the five Cochrane NCD corresponding authors from South Africa, only one other corresponding author was from Africa (Gambia). Discussion: The overwhelming body of evidence for NCDs pertains to high-income countries, with only a small number of review authors based in low-income settings. As a consequence, there is an urgent need for research infrastructure and funding for the undertaking of high-quality trials in this area.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880632567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003298

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003298

M3 - Article

VL - 3

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 7

M1 - e003298

ER -