Evidence-based Management in Practice: Opening up the Decision Process, Decision-maker and Context

April L. Wright, Raymond F. Zammuto, Peter W. Liesch, Stuart Middleton, Paul Hibbert, John Burke, Victoria Brazil

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evidence-based management (EBM) has been subject to a number of persuasive critiques in recent years. Concerns have been raised that: EBM over-privileges rationality as a basis for decision-making; 'scientific' evidence is insufficient and incomplete as a basis for management practice; understanding of how EBM actually plays out in practice is limited; and, although ideas were originally taken from evidence-based medicine, individual-situated expertise has been forgotten in the transfer. To address these concerns, the authors adopted an approach of 'opening up' the decision process, the decision-maker and the context (Langley et al. . 'Opening up decision making: the view from the black stool', Organization Science, 6, pp. 260-279). The empirical investigation focuses on an EBM decision process involving an operations management problem in a hospital emergency department in Australia. Based on interview and archival research, it describes how an EBM decision process was enacted by a physician manager. It identifies the role of 'fit' between the decision-maker and the organizational context in enabling an evidence-based process and develops insights for EBM theory and practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)161-178
Number of pages18
JournalBritish Journal of Management
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016

Fingerprint

Decision making
Decision maker
Evidence-based management
Decision process
Medicine
Managers
Management decisions
Management practices
Management theory
Empirical investigation
Rationality
Emergency department
Operations management
Evidence-based
Physicians
Archival research
Expertise
Evidence-based medicine
Organizational context

Cite this

Wright, A. L., Zammuto, R. F., Liesch, P. W., Middleton, S., Hibbert, P., Burke, J., & Brazil, V. (2016). Evidence-based Management in Practice: Opening up the Decision Process, Decision-maker and Context. British Journal of Management, 27(1), 161-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12123
Wright, April L. ; Zammuto, Raymond F. ; Liesch, Peter W. ; Middleton, Stuart ; Hibbert, Paul ; Burke, John ; Brazil, Victoria. / Evidence-based Management in Practice: Opening up the Decision Process, Decision-maker and Context. In: British Journal of Management. 2016 ; Vol. 27, No. 1. pp. 161-178.
@article{92972405eb934be6af6f697ddd2223b7,
title = "Evidence-based Management in Practice: Opening up the Decision Process, Decision-maker and Context",
abstract = "Evidence-based management (EBM) has been subject to a number of persuasive critiques in recent years. Concerns have been raised that: EBM over-privileges rationality as a basis for decision-making; 'scientific' evidence is insufficient and incomplete as a basis for management practice; understanding of how EBM actually plays out in practice is limited; and, although ideas were originally taken from evidence-based medicine, individual-situated expertise has been forgotten in the transfer. To address these concerns, the authors adopted an approach of 'opening up' the decision process, the decision-maker and the context (Langley et al. . 'Opening up decision making: the view from the black stool', Organization Science, 6, pp. 260-279). The empirical investigation focuses on an EBM decision process involving an operations management problem in a hospital emergency department in Australia. Based on interview and archival research, it describes how an EBM decision process was enacted by a physician manager. It identifies the role of 'fit' between the decision-maker and the organizational context in enabling an evidence-based process and develops insights for EBM theory and practice.",
author = "Wright, {April L.} and Zammuto, {Raymond F.} and Liesch, {Peter W.} and Stuart Middleton and Paul Hibbert and John Burke and Victoria Brazil",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1467-8551.12123",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "161--178",
journal = "British Journal of Management",
issn = "1045-3172",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Wright, AL, Zammuto, RF, Liesch, PW, Middleton, S, Hibbert, P, Burke, J & Brazil, V 2016, 'Evidence-based Management in Practice: Opening up the Decision Process, Decision-maker and Context' British Journal of Management, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 161-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12123

Evidence-based Management in Practice: Opening up the Decision Process, Decision-maker and Context. / Wright, April L.; Zammuto, Raymond F.; Liesch, Peter W.; Middleton, Stuart; Hibbert, Paul; Burke, John; Brazil, Victoria.

In: British Journal of Management, Vol. 27, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 161-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence-based Management in Practice: Opening up the Decision Process, Decision-maker and Context

AU - Wright, April L.

AU - Zammuto, Raymond F.

AU - Liesch, Peter W.

AU - Middleton, Stuart

AU - Hibbert, Paul

AU - Burke, John

AU - Brazil, Victoria

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Evidence-based management (EBM) has been subject to a number of persuasive critiques in recent years. Concerns have been raised that: EBM over-privileges rationality as a basis for decision-making; 'scientific' evidence is insufficient and incomplete as a basis for management practice; understanding of how EBM actually plays out in practice is limited; and, although ideas were originally taken from evidence-based medicine, individual-situated expertise has been forgotten in the transfer. To address these concerns, the authors adopted an approach of 'opening up' the decision process, the decision-maker and the context (Langley et al. . 'Opening up decision making: the view from the black stool', Organization Science, 6, pp. 260-279). The empirical investigation focuses on an EBM decision process involving an operations management problem in a hospital emergency department in Australia. Based on interview and archival research, it describes how an EBM decision process was enacted by a physician manager. It identifies the role of 'fit' between the decision-maker and the organizational context in enabling an evidence-based process and develops insights for EBM theory and practice.

AB - Evidence-based management (EBM) has been subject to a number of persuasive critiques in recent years. Concerns have been raised that: EBM over-privileges rationality as a basis for decision-making; 'scientific' evidence is insufficient and incomplete as a basis for management practice; understanding of how EBM actually plays out in practice is limited; and, although ideas were originally taken from evidence-based medicine, individual-situated expertise has been forgotten in the transfer. To address these concerns, the authors adopted an approach of 'opening up' the decision process, the decision-maker and the context (Langley et al. . 'Opening up decision making: the view from the black stool', Organization Science, 6, pp. 260-279). The empirical investigation focuses on an EBM decision process involving an operations management problem in a hospital emergency department in Australia. Based on interview and archival research, it describes how an EBM decision process was enacted by a physician manager. It identifies the role of 'fit' between the decision-maker and the organizational context in enabling an evidence-based process and develops insights for EBM theory and practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956760448&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1467-8551.12123

DO - 10.1111/1467-8551.12123

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 161

EP - 178

JO - British Journal of Management

JF - British Journal of Management

SN - 1045-3172

IS - 1

ER -