Evaluation of the role of near-peer teaching in critical appraisal skills learning: a randomized crossover trial

Indah S Widyahening, Ardi Findyartini, Respati W Ranakusuma, Esthika Dewiasty, Kuntjoro Harimurti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: The study sought to evaluate near-peer tutors' teaching of critical appraisal skills to medical students as an aspect of Evidence-based Medicine.

Methods: In a randomized crossover trial, 241 students completing a Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-based Medicine (CE-EBM) module in the Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia (FMUI) were randomly assigned to intervention or control groups. During tutorial sessions, intervention group participants were assigned to near-peer tutors, who were newly graduated doctors, and those in the control groups were assigned to staff tutors. After two tutorial sessions, intervention and control groups exchanged tutors for the next two sessions. Outcomes were measured using written knowledge and skills multiple choice questions (MCQ) test, the Evidence-based Practice Confidence Scale (EPIC) and a student attitude questionnaire, along with student evaluation of tutors to evaluate the process.

Results: On completion of the module, the written test scores of intervention group students were similar to those of the control group (t(239) = 1.553, p=0.122), as well as overall Evidence-based Practice Confidence Scale scores (F(2/170) = 0.179, p = 0.673) and attitude scores (t(219) =-0.676, p = 0.085). In the tutor evaluations, the students rated their near-peer tutored sessions as better than those tutored by staff in most respects.

Conclusions: Near-peer tutors were as effective as and more readily accepted than staff tutors in teaching critical appraisal skills. These findings support the broader implementation of peer-teaching in other areas of medical education.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-15
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Medical Education
Volume10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Jan 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cross-Over Studies
Teaching
Learning
Students
Control Groups
Evidence-Based Practice
Evidence-Based Medicine
Indonesia
Medical Education
Medical Students
Epidemiology
Medicine

Cite this

@article{306551298e684870ba959d4bdee74f78,
title = "Evaluation of the role of near-peer teaching in critical appraisal skills learning: a randomized crossover trial",
abstract = "Objectives: The study sought to evaluate near-peer tutors' teaching of critical appraisal skills to medical students as an aspect of Evidence-based Medicine.Methods: In a randomized crossover trial, 241 students completing a Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-based Medicine (CE-EBM) module in the Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia (FMUI) were randomly assigned to intervention or control groups. During tutorial sessions, intervention group participants were assigned to near-peer tutors, who were newly graduated doctors, and those in the control groups were assigned to staff tutors. After two tutorial sessions, intervention and control groups exchanged tutors for the next two sessions. Outcomes were measured using written knowledge and skills multiple choice questions (MCQ) test, the Evidence-based Practice Confidence Scale (EPIC) and a student attitude questionnaire, along with student evaluation of tutors to evaluate the process.Results: On completion of the module, the written test scores of intervention group students were similar to those of the control group (t(239) = 1.553, p=0.122), as well as overall Evidence-based Practice Confidence Scale scores (F(2/170) = 0.179, p = 0.673) and attitude scores (t(219) =-0.676, p = 0.085). In the tutor evaluations, the students rated their near-peer tutored sessions as better than those tutored by staff in most respects.Conclusions: Near-peer tutors were as effective as and more readily accepted than staff tutors in teaching critical appraisal skills. These findings support the broader implementation of peer-teaching in other areas of medical education.",
author = "Widyahening, {Indah S} and Ardi Findyartini and Ranakusuma, {Respati W} and Esthika Dewiasty and Kuntjoro Harimurti",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "25",
doi = "10.5116/ijme.5c39.b55b",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "9--15",
journal = "International Journal of Medical Education",
issn = "2042-6372",
publisher = "International journal of medical education",

}

Evaluation of the role of near-peer teaching in critical appraisal skills learning : a randomized crossover trial. / Widyahening, Indah S; Findyartini, Ardi; Ranakusuma, Respati W; Dewiasty, Esthika; Harimurti, Kuntjoro.

In: International Journal of Medical Education, Vol. 10, 25.01.2019, p. 9-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of the role of near-peer teaching in critical appraisal skills learning

T2 - a randomized crossover trial

AU - Widyahening, Indah S

AU - Findyartini, Ardi

AU - Ranakusuma, Respati W

AU - Dewiasty, Esthika

AU - Harimurti, Kuntjoro

PY - 2019/1/25

Y1 - 2019/1/25

N2 - Objectives: The study sought to evaluate near-peer tutors' teaching of critical appraisal skills to medical students as an aspect of Evidence-based Medicine.Methods: In a randomized crossover trial, 241 students completing a Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-based Medicine (CE-EBM) module in the Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia (FMUI) were randomly assigned to intervention or control groups. During tutorial sessions, intervention group participants were assigned to near-peer tutors, who were newly graduated doctors, and those in the control groups were assigned to staff tutors. After two tutorial sessions, intervention and control groups exchanged tutors for the next two sessions. Outcomes were measured using written knowledge and skills multiple choice questions (MCQ) test, the Evidence-based Practice Confidence Scale (EPIC) and a student attitude questionnaire, along with student evaluation of tutors to evaluate the process.Results: On completion of the module, the written test scores of intervention group students were similar to those of the control group (t(239) = 1.553, p=0.122), as well as overall Evidence-based Practice Confidence Scale scores (F(2/170) = 0.179, p = 0.673) and attitude scores (t(219) =-0.676, p = 0.085). In the tutor evaluations, the students rated their near-peer tutored sessions as better than those tutored by staff in most respects.Conclusions: Near-peer tutors were as effective as and more readily accepted than staff tutors in teaching critical appraisal skills. These findings support the broader implementation of peer-teaching in other areas of medical education.

AB - Objectives: The study sought to evaluate near-peer tutors' teaching of critical appraisal skills to medical students as an aspect of Evidence-based Medicine.Methods: In a randomized crossover trial, 241 students completing a Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-based Medicine (CE-EBM) module in the Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia (FMUI) were randomly assigned to intervention or control groups. During tutorial sessions, intervention group participants were assigned to near-peer tutors, who were newly graduated doctors, and those in the control groups were assigned to staff tutors. After two tutorial sessions, intervention and control groups exchanged tutors for the next two sessions. Outcomes were measured using written knowledge and skills multiple choice questions (MCQ) test, the Evidence-based Practice Confidence Scale (EPIC) and a student attitude questionnaire, along with student evaluation of tutors to evaluate the process.Results: On completion of the module, the written test scores of intervention group students were similar to those of the control group (t(239) = 1.553, p=0.122), as well as overall Evidence-based Practice Confidence Scale scores (F(2/170) = 0.179, p = 0.673) and attitude scores (t(219) =-0.676, p = 0.085). In the tutor evaluations, the students rated their near-peer tutored sessions as better than those tutored by staff in most respects.Conclusions: Near-peer tutors were as effective as and more readily accepted than staff tutors in teaching critical appraisal skills. These findings support the broader implementation of peer-teaching in other areas of medical education.

U2 - 10.5116/ijme.5c39.b55b

DO - 10.5116/ijme.5c39.b55b

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 9

EP - 15

JO - International Journal of Medical Education

JF - International Journal of Medical Education

SN - 2042-6372

ER -