Evaluation of construction contractor performance: A critical analysis of some recent research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

International comparisons of construction industry performance are notoriously difficult. A recent comparative study, extensive in scope and using an innovative approach, is reviewed and questions raised regarding various aspects of the methodology adopted, the validity of the conclusions drawn and manner in which outcomes were reported. Particular areas of concern include the unequivocal statement of conclusions that are based on a small sample, and the use of data from that sample that are, in fact, no more than estimates of project performance. Attention is drawn to the limitations of the research reported and the reliability of the methods used, and the data gathered is examined.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)439-445
Number of pages7
JournalConstruction Management and Economics
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Construction industry
Contractors
Evaluation
International comparison
Project performance
Methodology
Comparative study
Small sample
Industry performance

Cite this

@article{9e9de996098d4d2a89078dc70cbf0156,
title = "Evaluation of construction contractor performance: A critical analysis of some recent research",
abstract = "International comparisons of construction industry performance are notoriously difficult. A recent comparative study, extensive in scope and using an innovative approach, is reviewed and questions raised regarding various aspects of the methodology adopted, the validity of the conclusions drawn and manner in which outcomes were reported. Particular areas of concern include the unequivocal statement of conclusions that are based on a small sample, and the use of data from that sample that are, in fact, no more than estimates of project performance. Attention is drawn to the limitations of the research reported and the reliability of the methods used, and the data gathered is examined.",
author = "Rick Best and Craig Langston",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1080/01446190500435457",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "439--445",
journal = "Construction Management and Economics",
issn = "0144-6193",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Evaluation of construction contractor performance : A critical analysis of some recent research. / Best, Rick; Langston, Craig.

In: Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 24, No. 4, 04.2006, p. 439-445.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of construction contractor performance

T2 - A critical analysis of some recent research

AU - Best, Rick

AU - Langston, Craig

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - International comparisons of construction industry performance are notoriously difficult. A recent comparative study, extensive in scope and using an innovative approach, is reviewed and questions raised regarding various aspects of the methodology adopted, the validity of the conclusions drawn and manner in which outcomes were reported. Particular areas of concern include the unequivocal statement of conclusions that are based on a small sample, and the use of data from that sample that are, in fact, no more than estimates of project performance. Attention is drawn to the limitations of the research reported and the reliability of the methods used, and the data gathered is examined.

AB - International comparisons of construction industry performance are notoriously difficult. A recent comparative study, extensive in scope and using an innovative approach, is reviewed and questions raised regarding various aspects of the methodology adopted, the validity of the conclusions drawn and manner in which outcomes were reported. Particular areas of concern include the unequivocal statement of conclusions that are based on a small sample, and the use of data from that sample that are, in fact, no more than estimates of project performance. Attention is drawn to the limitations of the research reported and the reliability of the methods used, and the data gathered is examined.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646432509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01446190500435457

DO - 10.1080/01446190500435457

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 439

EP - 445

JO - Construction Management and Economics

JF - Construction Management and Economics

SN - 0144-6193

IS - 4

ER -