Evaluating organizational behavior teaching innovations: More rigorous designs, more relevant criteria, and an example

James B. Shaw, Cynthia D. Fisher, Greg N. Southey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evaluations of new methods of teaching Organizational Behavior (OB) usually rely on course ratings collected at the end of the semester. This article discusses the need for more rigorous designs for assessing teaching innovations, and proposes evaluating OB courses on the basis of change in self-ratings of managerial competencies. Selfratings of managerial competencies and a more sophisticated evaluation design are used to compare the Practical Organizational Behavior Education (PROBE) method to the lecture/tutorial method of delivering of OB material. PROBE produces greater perceived managerial skill learning than lecture/tutorial delivery for females, younger students, students with little work experience, and students from Western cultures. The discussion points out how incorrect conclusions might have been reached about the relative effectiveness of the two methods had a less sophisticated evaluation design been used.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)509-536
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Management Education
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999

Fingerprint

organizational behavior
innovation
Teaching
rating
evaluation
student
method of teaching
semester
education
Organizational behaviour
Innovation
learning
experience

Cite this

@article{7de25a5824c747eb8d8698811c6bf636,
title = "Evaluating organizational behavior teaching innovations: More rigorous designs, more relevant criteria, and an example",
abstract = "Evaluations of new methods of teaching Organizational Behavior (OB) usually rely on course ratings collected at the end of the semester. This article discusses the need for more rigorous designs for assessing teaching innovations, and proposes evaluating OB courses on the basis of change in self-ratings of managerial competencies. Selfratings of managerial competencies and a more sophisticated evaluation design are used to compare the Practical Organizational Behavior Education (PROBE) method to the lecture/tutorial method of delivering of OB material. PROBE produces greater perceived managerial skill learning than lecture/tutorial delivery for females, younger students, students with little work experience, and students from Western cultures. The discussion points out how incorrect conclusions might have been reached about the relative effectiveness of the two methods had a less sophisticated evaluation design been used.",
author = "Shaw, {James B.} and Fisher, {Cynthia D.} and Southey, {Greg N.}",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1177/105256299902300505",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "509--536",
journal = "Journal of Management Education",
issn = "1052-5629",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

Evaluating organizational behavior teaching innovations : More rigorous designs, more relevant criteria, and an example. / Shaw, James B.; Fisher, Cynthia D.; Southey, Greg N.

In: Journal of Management Education, Vol. 23, No. 5, 1999, p. 509-536.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating organizational behavior teaching innovations

T2 - More rigorous designs, more relevant criteria, and an example

AU - Shaw, James B.

AU - Fisher, Cynthia D.

AU - Southey, Greg N.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Evaluations of new methods of teaching Organizational Behavior (OB) usually rely on course ratings collected at the end of the semester. This article discusses the need for more rigorous designs for assessing teaching innovations, and proposes evaluating OB courses on the basis of change in self-ratings of managerial competencies. Selfratings of managerial competencies and a more sophisticated evaluation design are used to compare the Practical Organizational Behavior Education (PROBE) method to the lecture/tutorial method of delivering of OB material. PROBE produces greater perceived managerial skill learning than lecture/tutorial delivery for females, younger students, students with little work experience, and students from Western cultures. The discussion points out how incorrect conclusions might have been reached about the relative effectiveness of the two methods had a less sophisticated evaluation design been used.

AB - Evaluations of new methods of teaching Organizational Behavior (OB) usually rely on course ratings collected at the end of the semester. This article discusses the need for more rigorous designs for assessing teaching innovations, and proposes evaluating OB courses on the basis of change in self-ratings of managerial competencies. Selfratings of managerial competencies and a more sophisticated evaluation design are used to compare the Practical Organizational Behavior Education (PROBE) method to the lecture/tutorial method of delivering of OB material. PROBE produces greater perceived managerial skill learning than lecture/tutorial delivery for females, younger students, students with little work experience, and students from Western cultures. The discussion points out how incorrect conclusions might have been reached about the relative effectiveness of the two methods had a less sophisticated evaluation design been used.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1442311328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/105256299902300505

DO - 10.1177/105256299902300505

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 509

EP - 536

JO - Journal of Management Education

JF - Journal of Management Education

SN - 1052-5629

IS - 5

ER -