Evaluating general practitioners' views about the implementation of the Enhanced Primary Care Medicare items

T. M. Blakeman, M. F. Harris, E. J. Comino, N. A. Zwar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the issues for general practitioners surrounding the implementation of the Enhanced Primary Care (EPC) Medicare items for health assessments, care planning and case conferencing. Design: Qualitative study of GPs' responses to a semistructured face-to-face interview. Participants and setting: 30 GPs in the South Western Sydney Area. Main outcome measures: GPs' perceptions regarding barriers to coordination of care; use of the EPC items; difficulties with implementation; suggestions for improving EPC implementation; and coordination of care in general practice. Results: Five main categories of response were identified to each area of questioning: time, organisation, communication, education, and resources. GPs expressed difficulties incorporating use of the items into their daily practice without support. Conclusions: Implementation of the EPC items not only facilitates integration between GPs and other healthcare professionals, it also depends upon other forms of integration to succeed. A facilitator and a structured framework to address issues are required to assist their implementation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-98
Number of pages4
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Volume175
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 16 Jul 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medicare
General Practitioners
Primary Health Care
Delivery of Health Care
General Practice
Communication
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Organizations
Interviews
Education

Cite this

@article{1bc41e0e7a2f42bba245e2d304b33c18,
title = "Evaluating general practitioners' views about the implementation of the Enhanced Primary Care Medicare items",
abstract = "Objective: To investigate the issues for general practitioners surrounding the implementation of the Enhanced Primary Care (EPC) Medicare items for health assessments, care planning and case conferencing. Design: Qualitative study of GPs' responses to a semistructured face-to-face interview. Participants and setting: 30 GPs in the South Western Sydney Area. Main outcome measures: GPs' perceptions regarding barriers to coordination of care; use of the EPC items; difficulties with implementation; suggestions for improving EPC implementation; and coordination of care in general practice. Results: Five main categories of response were identified to each area of questioning: time, organisation, communication, education, and resources. GPs expressed difficulties incorporating use of the items into their daily practice without support. Conclusions: Implementation of the EPC items not only facilitates integration between GPs and other healthcare professionals, it also depends upon other forms of integration to succeed. A facilitator and a structured framework to address issues are required to assist their implementation.",
author = "Blakeman, {T. M.} and Harris, {M. F.} and Comino, {E. J.} and Zwar, {N. A.}",
year = "2001",
month = "7",
day = "16",
language = "English",
volume = "175",
pages = "95--98",
journal = "Medical Journal of Australia",
issn = "0025-729X",
publisher = "AUSTRALASIAN MED PUBL CO LTD",
number = "2",

}

Evaluating general practitioners' views about the implementation of the Enhanced Primary Care Medicare items. / Blakeman, T. M.; Harris, M. F.; Comino, E. J.; Zwar, N. A.

In: Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 175, No. 2, 16.07.2001, p. 95-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating general practitioners' views about the implementation of the Enhanced Primary Care Medicare items

AU - Blakeman, T. M.

AU - Harris, M. F.

AU - Comino, E. J.

AU - Zwar, N. A.

PY - 2001/7/16

Y1 - 2001/7/16

N2 - Objective: To investigate the issues for general practitioners surrounding the implementation of the Enhanced Primary Care (EPC) Medicare items for health assessments, care planning and case conferencing. Design: Qualitative study of GPs' responses to a semistructured face-to-face interview. Participants and setting: 30 GPs in the South Western Sydney Area. Main outcome measures: GPs' perceptions regarding barriers to coordination of care; use of the EPC items; difficulties with implementation; suggestions for improving EPC implementation; and coordination of care in general practice. Results: Five main categories of response were identified to each area of questioning: time, organisation, communication, education, and resources. GPs expressed difficulties incorporating use of the items into their daily practice without support. Conclusions: Implementation of the EPC items not only facilitates integration between GPs and other healthcare professionals, it also depends upon other forms of integration to succeed. A facilitator and a structured framework to address issues are required to assist their implementation.

AB - Objective: To investigate the issues for general practitioners surrounding the implementation of the Enhanced Primary Care (EPC) Medicare items for health assessments, care planning and case conferencing. Design: Qualitative study of GPs' responses to a semistructured face-to-face interview. Participants and setting: 30 GPs in the South Western Sydney Area. Main outcome measures: GPs' perceptions regarding barriers to coordination of care; use of the EPC items; difficulties with implementation; suggestions for improving EPC implementation; and coordination of care in general practice. Results: Five main categories of response were identified to each area of questioning: time, organisation, communication, education, and resources. GPs expressed difficulties incorporating use of the items into their daily practice without support. Conclusions: Implementation of the EPC items not only facilitates integration between GPs and other healthcare professionals, it also depends upon other forms of integration to succeed. A facilitator and a structured framework to address issues are required to assist their implementation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035898483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 175

SP - 95

EP - 98

JO - Medical Journal of Australia

JF - Medical Journal of Australia

SN - 0025-729X

IS - 2

ER -