TY - JOUR
T1 - Environmental regulation and green productivity of the construction industry in China
AU - Zhang, Jingxiao
AU - Li, Hui
AU - Pu, Si
AU - Skitmore, Martin
AU - Philbin, Simon P.
AU - Ballesteros-Pérez, Pablo
N1 - Funding Information:
This research is supported by the National Social Science Fund post-financing projects (number 19FJYB017), the Humanity and Social Science Program Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China (number 17YJA790091) and the List of Key Science and Technology Projects in China’s Transportation Industry in 2018-International Science and Technology Cooperation Project (numbers 2018-GH-006 and 2019-MS5-100). The sixth author acknowledges the Spanish Ministries of Science, Innovation and Universities for his Ramon y Cajal contract (number RYC-2017-22222) co-funded by the European Social Fund.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 ICE Publishing. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - There are few studies analysing whether different types of environmental regulation have differential impacts on the efficiency of the construction industry. Using 2012-2016 panel data from 30 provinces in China, the green total factor productivity (GTFP) of the construction industry is measured with a global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index based on the epsilon measure model. Thereafter, a panel tobit regression model is proposed to explore the relationship between three types of environmental regulation and the GTFP of the construction industry. The results show that (a) from 2012 to 2016, the GTFP of the Chinese construction industry grew slowly at an average annual rate of 0.14%; (b) both one-phase lagged command-and-control and current phase market-based environmental regulation had a positive linear relationship with GTFP, while one-phase lagged voluntary environmental regulation, on the other hand, had an inverted U-shaped relationship with GTFP; (c) the three types of environmental regulation can be combined to establish a suitable environmental regulation system. The findings of this study provide guidance for the sustainable development of the construction industry by combining the actions of different types of environmental regulation.
AB - There are few studies analysing whether different types of environmental regulation have differential impacts on the efficiency of the construction industry. Using 2012-2016 panel data from 30 provinces in China, the green total factor productivity (GTFP) of the construction industry is measured with a global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index based on the epsilon measure model. Thereafter, a panel tobit regression model is proposed to explore the relationship between three types of environmental regulation and the GTFP of the construction industry. The results show that (a) from 2012 to 2016, the GTFP of the Chinese construction industry grew slowly at an average annual rate of 0.14%; (b) both one-phase lagged command-and-control and current phase market-based environmental regulation had a positive linear relationship with GTFP, while one-phase lagged voluntary environmental regulation, on the other hand, had an inverted U-shaped relationship with GTFP; (c) the three types of environmental regulation can be combined to establish a suitable environmental regulation system. The findings of this study provide guidance for the sustainable development of the construction industry by combining the actions of different types of environmental regulation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104849527&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1680/jensu.20.00013
DO - 10.1680/jensu.20.00013
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85104849527
SN - 1478-4629
VL - 174
SP - 58
EP - 68
JO - Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Engineering Sustainability
JF - Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Engineering Sustainability
IS - 2
ER -