Enhancing sustainability through designing for adaptive reuse from the outset: A comparison of adaptstar and adaptive reuse potential (ARP) models

Sheila Conejos, Craig Langston, Jim Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to make the case for the development of an adaptive reuse rating tool targeted to new building design that maximizes the embedded adaptive reuse potential of these buildings later in their life, thereby adding to built environment sustainability. Design/methodology/approach – This exploratory study retrospectively analyses successful adaptive reuse projects to establish and test a multi-criteria decision-making model for new design projects. This paper contains a report on the final stages of the research methodology (quantitative approach) used in the development of the adapt STAR model that critically assesses the list of design criteria identified in the first stage of the study. Improvements to the case studies that would have further enhanced their reuse potential later in life are proposed. The results are compared to an established decision tool (adaptive reuse potential [ARP] model) to determine their level of consistency. Findings – The findings of this research show that design criteria can be identified and weighted according to seven categories to calculate a building’s adaptive reuse star rating. Both the adapt STAR and ARP models exhibit a strong relationship and are positively correlated. Originality/value – The research demonstrates that by applying adapt STAR to new designs, it will contribute to greater sustainability for the built environment in the long term via reducing the rate of building obsolescence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)531-552
Number of pages22
JournalFacilities
Volume33
Issue number9-10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jul 2015

Fingerprint

Sustainable development
sustainability
building
rating
decision making criterion
new building
methodology
Obsolescence
Stars
Decision making
Values

Cite this

@article{b8a2c20f55884bda8d9c2efbdaf6f668,
title = "Enhancing sustainability through designing for adaptive reuse from the outset: A comparison of adaptstar and adaptive reuse potential (ARP) models",
abstract = "Purpose – This paper aims to make the case for the development of an adaptive reuse rating tool targeted to new building design that maximizes the embedded adaptive reuse potential of these buildings later in their life, thereby adding to built environment sustainability. Design/methodology/approach – This exploratory study retrospectively analyses successful adaptive reuse projects to establish and test a multi-criteria decision-making model for new design projects. This paper contains a report on the final stages of the research methodology (quantitative approach) used in the development of the adapt STAR model that critically assesses the list of design criteria identified in the first stage of the study. Improvements to the case studies that would have further enhanced their reuse potential later in life are proposed. The results are compared to an established decision tool (adaptive reuse potential [ARP] model) to determine their level of consistency. Findings – The findings of this research show that design criteria can be identified and weighted according to seven categories to calculate a building’s adaptive reuse star rating. Both the adapt STAR and ARP models exhibit a strong relationship and are positively correlated. Originality/value – The research demonstrates that by applying adapt STAR to new designs, it will contribute to greater sustainability for the built environment in the long term via reducing the rate of building obsolescence.",
author = "Sheila Conejos and Craig Langston and Jim Smith",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1108/F-02-2013-0011",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "531--552",
journal = "Facilities",
issn = "0263-2772",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "9-10",

}

Enhancing sustainability through designing for adaptive reuse from the outset : A comparison of adaptstar and adaptive reuse potential (ARP) models. / Conejos, Sheila; Langston, Craig; Smith, Jim.

In: Facilities, Vol. 33, No. 9-10, 06.07.2015, p. 531-552.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enhancing sustainability through designing for adaptive reuse from the outset

T2 - A comparison of adaptstar and adaptive reuse potential (ARP) models

AU - Conejos, Sheila

AU - Langston, Craig

AU - Smith, Jim

PY - 2015/7/6

Y1 - 2015/7/6

N2 - Purpose – This paper aims to make the case for the development of an adaptive reuse rating tool targeted to new building design that maximizes the embedded adaptive reuse potential of these buildings later in their life, thereby adding to built environment sustainability. Design/methodology/approach – This exploratory study retrospectively analyses successful adaptive reuse projects to establish and test a multi-criteria decision-making model for new design projects. This paper contains a report on the final stages of the research methodology (quantitative approach) used in the development of the adapt STAR model that critically assesses the list of design criteria identified in the first stage of the study. Improvements to the case studies that would have further enhanced their reuse potential later in life are proposed. The results are compared to an established decision tool (adaptive reuse potential [ARP] model) to determine their level of consistency. Findings – The findings of this research show that design criteria can be identified and weighted according to seven categories to calculate a building’s adaptive reuse star rating. Both the adapt STAR and ARP models exhibit a strong relationship and are positively correlated. Originality/value – The research demonstrates that by applying adapt STAR to new designs, it will contribute to greater sustainability for the built environment in the long term via reducing the rate of building obsolescence.

AB - Purpose – This paper aims to make the case for the development of an adaptive reuse rating tool targeted to new building design that maximizes the embedded adaptive reuse potential of these buildings later in their life, thereby adding to built environment sustainability. Design/methodology/approach – This exploratory study retrospectively analyses successful adaptive reuse projects to establish and test a multi-criteria decision-making model for new design projects. This paper contains a report on the final stages of the research methodology (quantitative approach) used in the development of the adapt STAR model that critically assesses the list of design criteria identified in the first stage of the study. Improvements to the case studies that would have further enhanced their reuse potential later in life are proposed. The results are compared to an established decision tool (adaptive reuse potential [ARP] model) to determine their level of consistency. Findings – The findings of this research show that design criteria can be identified and weighted according to seven categories to calculate a building’s adaptive reuse star rating. Both the adapt STAR and ARP models exhibit a strong relationship and are positively correlated. Originality/value – The research demonstrates that by applying adapt STAR to new designs, it will contribute to greater sustainability for the built environment in the long term via reducing the rate of building obsolescence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930980772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/F-02-2013-0011

DO - 10.1108/F-02-2013-0011

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 531

EP - 552

JO - Facilities

JF - Facilities

SN - 0263-2772

IS - 9-10

ER -