Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Electronic Health Interventions for Patients With Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

  • Anna C Singleton*
  • , Rebecca Raeside
  • , Karice K Hyun
  • , Stephanie R Partridge
  • , Gian Luca Di Tanna
  • , Nashid Hafiz
  • , Qiang Tu
  • , Justin Tat-Ko
  • , Stephanie Che Mun Sum
  • , Kerry A Sherman
  • , Elisabeth Elder
  • , Julie Redfern
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ongoing supportive care using electronic health (eHealth) interventions has the potential to provide remote support and improve health outcomes for patients with breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of eHealth interventions on patient-reported outcomes (quality of life [QOL], self-efficacy, and mental or physical health) for patients during and after breast cancer treatment and patient-reported experience measures (acceptability and engagement).

METHODS: Systematic review with meta-analyses (random-effects model) of randomized controlled trials was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Nine databases were searched using a prespecified search strategy. Patient-directed eHealth interventions for adult patients during or after active breast cancer treatment measuring QOL, self-efficacy, and mental (depressive, anxiety, and distress symptoms) or physical (physical activity, nutrition, and fatigue) health outcomes were included. Data from eligible full-text articles were independently extracted by six observers.

RESULTS: Thirty-two unique studies (4,790 patients) were included. All were health self-management interventions, and most were multicomponent (videos, forums, and electronic reminder systems) websites. Meta-analyses revealed a significant effect of eHealth interventions on QOL (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.20 [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.36]), self-efficacy (SMD, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.65]), distress (SMD, -0.41 [95% CI,-0.63 to -0.20]), and fatigue (SMD, -0.37 [95% CI, -0.61 to -0.13]). Twenty-five studies (78.1%) measured patient-reported experience measures. Acceptability (n = 9) was high, with high ratings for satisfaction (range, 71%-100%), usefulness (range, 71%-95%), and ease-of-use (range, 73%-92%). Engagement (n = 25) decreased over time, but disease-focused information and interactive support were most engaging.

CONCLUSION: eHealth interventions may provide an acceptable and effective strategy for improving QOL, distress, self-efficacy, and fatigue among patients with breast cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberJCO.21.01171
Pages (from-to)2257-2270
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume40
Issue number20
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2022
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Electronic Health Interventions for Patients With Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this