eHealth tools to provide structured assistance for atrial fibrillation screening, management, and guideline-recommended therapy in metropolitan general practice: The AF-SMART study

Jessica Orchard, Lis Neubeck, Ben Freedman, Jialin Li, Ruth Webster, Nicholas Zwar, Robyn Gallagher, Caleb Ferguson, Nicole Lowres

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background—This eHealth implementation study aimed to evaluate strategies to promote opportunistic atrial fibrillation (AF) screening using electronic screening prompts and improve treatment using electronic decision support (EDS) software. Methods and Results—An electronic screening prompt appeared whenever an eligible patient’s (aged ≥65 years, no AF diagnosis) medical record was opened in participating general practices. General practitioners and practice nurses offered screening using a smartphone ECG, with validated AF algorithm. Guideline-based EDS was provided to assist treatment decisions. Deidentified data were collected from practices using a data extraction tool. General practices (n=8) across Sydney, Australia, screened for a median of 6 months. A total of 1805 of 11 476 (16%) eligible patients who attended were screened (44% men, mean age 75.7 years). Screening identified 19 (1.1%) new cases of AF (mean age, 79 years; mean CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc, 3.7; 53% men). General practitioners (n=30) performed 70% of all screenings (range 1–448 patients per general practitioner). The proportion of patients with AF who had CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc ≥2 for men or ≥3 for women prescribed oral anticoagulants was higher for those diagnosed during the study: 15 of 18 (83%) for screen-detected and 39 of 46 (85%) for clinically detected, compared with 933 of 1306 (71%) patients diagnosed before the study (P<0.001). The EDS was accessed 111 times for patients with AF and for 4 of 19 screen-detected patients. Conclusions—The eHealth tools showed promise. Adherence to guideline-based oral anticoagulant prescription was significantly higher in patients diagnosed during the study period, although the EDS was only used in a minority. While the proportion of eligible patients screened and EDS use was relatively low, further refinements may improve uptake in clinical practice. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: www.anzctr.org.au. Unique identifier: ACTRN12616000850471.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere010959
JournalJournal of the American Heart Association
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Telemedicine
General Practice
Atrial Fibrillation
Guidelines
General Practitioners
Therapeutics
Anticoagulants
Guideline Adherence
Medical Records
Prescriptions
Electrocardiography
Software
Nurses
Clinical Trials

Cite this

Orchard, Jessica ; Neubeck, Lis ; Freedman, Ben ; Li, Jialin ; Webster, Ruth ; Zwar, Nicholas ; Gallagher, Robyn ; Ferguson, Caleb ; Lowres, Nicole. / eHealth tools to provide structured assistance for atrial fibrillation screening, management, and guideline-recommended therapy in metropolitan general practice : The AF-SMART study. In: Journal of the American Heart Association. 2019 ; Vol. 8, No. 1.
@article{e507022dacb14f9bb0e38d6de3ca1718,
title = "eHealth tools to provide structured assistance for atrial fibrillation screening, management, and guideline-recommended therapy in metropolitan general practice: The AF-SMART study",
abstract = "Background—This eHealth implementation study aimed to evaluate strategies to promote opportunistic atrial fibrillation (AF) screening using electronic screening prompts and improve treatment using electronic decision support (EDS) software. Methods and Results—An electronic screening prompt appeared whenever an eligible patient’s (aged ≥65 years, no AF diagnosis) medical record was opened in participating general practices. General practitioners and practice nurses offered screening using a smartphone ECG, with validated AF algorithm. Guideline-based EDS was provided to assist treatment decisions. Deidentified data were collected from practices using a data extraction tool. General practices (n=8) across Sydney, Australia, screened for a median of 6 months. A total of 1805 of 11 476 (16{\%}) eligible patients who attended were screened (44{\%} men, mean age 75.7 years). Screening identified 19 (1.1{\%}) new cases of AF (mean age, 79 years; mean CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc, 3.7; 53{\%} men). General practitioners (n=30) performed 70{\%} of all screenings (range 1–448 patients per general practitioner). The proportion of patients with AF who had CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc ≥2 for men or ≥3 for women prescribed oral anticoagulants was higher for those diagnosed during the study: 15 of 18 (83{\%}) for screen-detected and 39 of 46 (85{\%}) for clinically detected, compared with 933 of 1306 (71{\%}) patients diagnosed before the study (P<0.001). The EDS was accessed 111 times for patients with AF and for 4 of 19 screen-detected patients. Conclusions—The eHealth tools showed promise. Adherence to guideline-based oral anticoagulant prescription was significantly higher in patients diagnosed during the study period, although the EDS was only used in a minority. While the proportion of eligible patients screened and EDS use was relatively low, further refinements may improve uptake in clinical practice. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: www.anzctr.org.au. Unique identifier: ACTRN12616000850471.",
author = "Jessica Orchard and Lis Neubeck and Ben Freedman and Jialin Li and Ruth Webster and Nicholas Zwar and Robyn Gallagher and Caleb Ferguson and Nicole Lowres",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1161/JAHA.118.010959",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Journal of the American Heart Association",
issn = "2047-9980",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

eHealth tools to provide structured assistance for atrial fibrillation screening, management, and guideline-recommended therapy in metropolitan general practice : The AF-SMART study. / Orchard, Jessica; Neubeck, Lis; Freedman, Ben; Li, Jialin; Webster, Ruth; Zwar, Nicholas; Gallagher, Robyn; Ferguson, Caleb; Lowres, Nicole.

In: Journal of the American Heart Association, Vol. 8, No. 1, e010959, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - eHealth tools to provide structured assistance for atrial fibrillation screening, management, and guideline-recommended therapy in metropolitan general practice

T2 - The AF-SMART study

AU - Orchard, Jessica

AU - Neubeck, Lis

AU - Freedman, Ben

AU - Li, Jialin

AU - Webster, Ruth

AU - Zwar, Nicholas

AU - Gallagher, Robyn

AU - Ferguson, Caleb

AU - Lowres, Nicole

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background—This eHealth implementation study aimed to evaluate strategies to promote opportunistic atrial fibrillation (AF) screening using electronic screening prompts and improve treatment using electronic decision support (EDS) software. Methods and Results—An electronic screening prompt appeared whenever an eligible patient’s (aged ≥65 years, no AF diagnosis) medical record was opened in participating general practices. General practitioners and practice nurses offered screening using a smartphone ECG, with validated AF algorithm. Guideline-based EDS was provided to assist treatment decisions. Deidentified data were collected from practices using a data extraction tool. General practices (n=8) across Sydney, Australia, screened for a median of 6 months. A total of 1805 of 11 476 (16%) eligible patients who attended were screened (44% men, mean age 75.7 years). Screening identified 19 (1.1%) new cases of AF (mean age, 79 years; mean CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc, 3.7; 53% men). General practitioners (n=30) performed 70% of all screenings (range 1–448 patients per general practitioner). The proportion of patients with AF who had CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc ≥2 for men or ≥3 for women prescribed oral anticoagulants was higher for those diagnosed during the study: 15 of 18 (83%) for screen-detected and 39 of 46 (85%) for clinically detected, compared with 933 of 1306 (71%) patients diagnosed before the study (P<0.001). The EDS was accessed 111 times for patients with AF and for 4 of 19 screen-detected patients. Conclusions—The eHealth tools showed promise. Adherence to guideline-based oral anticoagulant prescription was significantly higher in patients diagnosed during the study period, although the EDS was only used in a minority. While the proportion of eligible patients screened and EDS use was relatively low, further refinements may improve uptake in clinical practice. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: www.anzctr.org.au. Unique identifier: ACTRN12616000850471.

AB - Background—This eHealth implementation study aimed to evaluate strategies to promote opportunistic atrial fibrillation (AF) screening using electronic screening prompts and improve treatment using electronic decision support (EDS) software. Methods and Results—An electronic screening prompt appeared whenever an eligible patient’s (aged ≥65 years, no AF diagnosis) medical record was opened in participating general practices. General practitioners and practice nurses offered screening using a smartphone ECG, with validated AF algorithm. Guideline-based EDS was provided to assist treatment decisions. Deidentified data were collected from practices using a data extraction tool. General practices (n=8) across Sydney, Australia, screened for a median of 6 months. A total of 1805 of 11 476 (16%) eligible patients who attended were screened (44% men, mean age 75.7 years). Screening identified 19 (1.1%) new cases of AF (mean age, 79 years; mean CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc, 3.7; 53% men). General practitioners (n=30) performed 70% of all screenings (range 1–448 patients per general practitioner). The proportion of patients with AF who had CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc ≥2 for men or ≥3 for women prescribed oral anticoagulants was higher for those diagnosed during the study: 15 of 18 (83%) for screen-detected and 39 of 46 (85%) for clinically detected, compared with 933 of 1306 (71%) patients diagnosed before the study (P<0.001). The EDS was accessed 111 times for patients with AF and for 4 of 19 screen-detected patients. Conclusions—The eHealth tools showed promise. Adherence to guideline-based oral anticoagulant prescription was significantly higher in patients diagnosed during the study period, although the EDS was only used in a minority. While the proportion of eligible patients screened and EDS use was relatively low, further refinements may improve uptake in clinical practice. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: www.anzctr.org.au. Unique identifier: ACTRN12616000850471.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059225540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/JAHA.118.010959

DO - 10.1161/JAHA.118.010959

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - Journal of the American Heart Association

JF - Journal of the American Heart Association

SN - 2047-9980

IS - 1

M1 - e010959

ER -