Efficacy and effectiveness of carnitine supplementation for cancer-related fatigue: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Wolfgang Marx, Laisa Teleni, Rachelle S. Opie, Jaimon T Kelly, Skye Marshall, Catherine Itsiopoulos, Elisabeth Isenring

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)
177 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background
Carnitine deficiency has been implicated as a potential pathway for cancer-related fatigue that could be treated with carnitine supplementation. The aim of this systematic literature review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the literature regarding the use of supplemental carnitine as a treatment for cancer-related fatigue. 
Methods
Using the PRISMA guidelines, an electronic search of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and reference lists was conducted. Data were extracted and independently assessed for quality using the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics evidence analysis by two reviewers. In studies with positive quality ratings, a meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model on Carnitine and cancer-related fatigue. 
Results
Twelve studies were included for review with eight reporting improvement in measures of fatigue, while four reported no benefit. However, many studies were non-randomized, open-label and/or used inappropriate dose or comparators. Meta-analysis was performed in three studies with sufficient data. Carnitine did not significantly reduce cancer-related fatigue with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.06 points ((95% CI −0.09, 0.21); p = 0.45). 
Conclusion 
Results from studies with lower risk of bias do not support the use of carnitine supplementation for cancer-related fatigue.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1224
Number of pages24
JournalNutrients
Volume9
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy and effectiveness of carnitine supplementation for cancer-related fatigue: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this