Effects of temporal aggregation and systematic sampling on model dynamics and causal inference

Research output: ThesisDoctoral ThesisResearch

Abstract

Many economic time series are available only in temporally aggregated or systematically sampled forms depending on whether they are flow or stock variables. It was known in the theoretical literature that temporal aggregation might distort causal relationships between variables while systematic sampling would preserve the causal direction. These findings are, however, limited to stationary series. This thesis re-examines these issues under both stationary and non-stationary scenarios and provides a quantitative assessment of the distortions by deriving the limiting values of least squares estimates and t statistics under temporal aggregation and systematic sampling. It is observed that in general the most distorting causal inferences occur at low levels of temporal aggregation. At high levels of aggregation, causal information concentrates in contemporaneous correlations. Quite contrary to the stationary case, this study finds that systematic sampling of integrated series may induce spurious causality. Since it is unavoidable to use temporally aggregated or systematically sampled data in causal inferences, the best approach to take is to formulate causality-testing procedures within a co-integrating framework. It is well established that integration and co-integration are invariant to temporal aggregation and systematic sampling. Co-integration also implies Granger causality though the direction is unknown. This study formulates a causality-testing procedure within an error correction format and fills a very important gap that existed in the literature.
Original languageEnglish
QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
Awarding Institution
  • National University of Singapore
Supervisors/Advisors
  • Abeysinghe, Tilak, Principal Supervisor, External person
Award date30 Jun 2004
Publisher
Publication statusPublished - 16 May 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

sampling
error correction
effect
time series
economics
statistics
thesis
preserve

Cite this

@phdthesis{39f380529f4f44fe9acbba4082be0b6d,
title = "Effects of temporal aggregation and systematic sampling on model dynamics and causal inference",
abstract = "Many economic time series are available only in temporally aggregated or systematically sampled forms depending on whether they are flow or stock variables. It was known in the theoretical literature that temporal aggregation might distort causal relationships between variables while systematic sampling would preserve the causal direction. These findings are, however, limited to stationary series. This thesis re-examines these issues under both stationary and non-stationary scenarios and provides a quantitative assessment of the distortions by deriving the limiting values of least squares estimates and t statistics under temporal aggregation and systematic sampling. It is observed that in general the most distorting causal inferences occur at low levels of temporal aggregation. At high levels of aggregation, causal information concentrates in contemporaneous correlations. Quite contrary to the stationary case, this study finds that systematic sampling of integrated series may induce spurious causality. Since it is unavoidable to use temporally aggregated or systematically sampled data in causal inferences, the best approach to take is to formulate causality-testing procedures within a co-integrating framework. It is well established that integration and co-integration are invariant to temporal aggregation and systematic sampling. Co-integration also implies Granger causality though the direction is unknown. This study formulates a causality-testing procedure within an error correction format and fills a very important gap that existed in the literature.",
author = "Gulasekaran Rajaguru",
year = "2004",
month = "5",
day = "16",
language = "English",
publisher = "National University of Singapore",
address = "Singapore",
school = "National University of Singapore",

}

Effects of temporal aggregation and systematic sampling on model dynamics and causal inference. / Rajaguru, Gulasekaran.

National University of Singapore, 2004. 423 p.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral ThesisResearch

TY - THES

T1 - Effects of temporal aggregation and systematic sampling on model dynamics and causal inference

AU - Rajaguru, Gulasekaran

PY - 2004/5/16

Y1 - 2004/5/16

N2 - Many economic time series are available only in temporally aggregated or systematically sampled forms depending on whether they are flow or stock variables. It was known in the theoretical literature that temporal aggregation might distort causal relationships between variables while systematic sampling would preserve the causal direction. These findings are, however, limited to stationary series. This thesis re-examines these issues under both stationary and non-stationary scenarios and provides a quantitative assessment of the distortions by deriving the limiting values of least squares estimates and t statistics under temporal aggregation and systematic sampling. It is observed that in general the most distorting causal inferences occur at low levels of temporal aggregation. At high levels of aggregation, causal information concentrates in contemporaneous correlations. Quite contrary to the stationary case, this study finds that systematic sampling of integrated series may induce spurious causality. Since it is unavoidable to use temporally aggregated or systematically sampled data in causal inferences, the best approach to take is to formulate causality-testing procedures within a co-integrating framework. It is well established that integration and co-integration are invariant to temporal aggregation and systematic sampling. Co-integration also implies Granger causality though the direction is unknown. This study formulates a causality-testing procedure within an error correction format and fills a very important gap that existed in the literature.

AB - Many economic time series are available only in temporally aggregated or systematically sampled forms depending on whether they are flow or stock variables. It was known in the theoretical literature that temporal aggregation might distort causal relationships between variables while systematic sampling would preserve the causal direction. These findings are, however, limited to stationary series. This thesis re-examines these issues under both stationary and non-stationary scenarios and provides a quantitative assessment of the distortions by deriving the limiting values of least squares estimates and t statistics under temporal aggregation and systematic sampling. It is observed that in general the most distorting causal inferences occur at low levels of temporal aggregation. At high levels of aggregation, causal information concentrates in contemporaneous correlations. Quite contrary to the stationary case, this study finds that systematic sampling of integrated series may induce spurious causality. Since it is unavoidable to use temporally aggregated or systematically sampled data in causal inferences, the best approach to take is to formulate causality-testing procedures within a co-integrating framework. It is well established that integration and co-integration are invariant to temporal aggregation and systematic sampling. Co-integration also implies Granger causality though the direction is unknown. This study formulates a causality-testing procedure within an error correction format and fills a very important gap that existed in the literature.

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

PB - National University of Singapore

ER -