Effects of interval between diagnosis and time of survey upon preferred information format for prostate cancer patients: Radiation oncology - Original article

Cf Sharpley*, David R H Christie

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous data indicate that receiving adequate information about their cancer can assist patients to cope with treatment and comply with treatment regimes. The aim of the present study was to determine whether time since diagnosis affected patients' evaluations of the information they had received at the time of their diagnosis. Two hundred and thirty-seven patients who had received a diagnosis and treatment for prostate cancer 4 months earlier completed a questionnaire about their ratings of, and preferences for, various types of information, their anxiety and depression levels and some background data. The most common and preferred form of information that the patients in the current study received was verbal information during an interview with their oncologist. Demographic factors and levels of anxiety and depression did not influence patient information preferences. Time since diagnosis was associated with elevated anxiety and depression, and consequent lower recall of having received information, but also with positive inflation of the value of the material that they did recall having received. Patients may not recall information given to them early after diagnosis and may make unreliable evaluations of its value to them due to psychological state.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)221-225
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology
Volume53
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of interval between diagnosis and time of survey upon preferred information format for prostate cancer patients: Radiation oncology - Original article'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this