Effects of additional blood pressure and lipid measurements on the prediction of cardiovascular risk

Katy Bell, Andrew Hayen, Kevin McGeechan, Bruce Neal, Les Irwig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend that decisions to start preventative therapy for cardiovascular disease (CVD) should be based on absolute risk; however, current risk equations are based on single measurements of risk factors. We aimed to assess whether two measurements of blood pressure and lipids improves the prediction of cardiovascular risk compared to one measurement.

METHODS AND RESULTS: We used sex-specific Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the risk of first CVD event in 2385 participants of the Framingham Offspring Study attending both the second and third visits. We estimated the effects on risk prediction of using the average of two measurements of blood pressure, total cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol compared to using one measurement of the risk factors. We found that these risk factors were each markedly more predictive of CVD when the average of two measurements was used rather than one measurement and age was less predictive of CVD. There were small improvements in the overall model fit, discrimination, and calibration. Reclassification also showed small improvements across the risk spectrum (net reclassification information, NRI, for women 3.0%, 95% CI -0.9 to 24.8%; NRI for men 4.0%, 95% CI -2.2 to 14.1%) and possibly greater improvements for intermediate-risk individuals (NRI for women 32.3%, 95% CI -21.9 to 46.8%; NRI for men 16.0%, 95% CI -3.3 to 43%).

CONCLUSIONS: Averaging two measurements of blood pressure and lipids results in marked increases in the predictiveness of these risk factors and smaller improvements in the overall prediction of cardiovascular risk including reclassification.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1474-85
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Volume19
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Blood Pressure
Lipids
Cardiovascular Diseases
Proportional Hazards Models
HDL Cholesterol
Calibration
Cholesterol
Guidelines

Cite this

Bell, Katy ; Hayen, Andrew ; McGeechan, Kevin ; Neal, Bruce ; Irwig, Les. / Effects of additional blood pressure and lipid measurements on the prediction of cardiovascular risk. In: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2012 ; Vol. 19, No. 6. pp. 1474-85.
@article{6e0d11d9c6084ab3b5b98a83ea660ac2,
title = "Effects of additional blood pressure and lipid measurements on the prediction of cardiovascular risk",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend that decisions to start preventative therapy for cardiovascular disease (CVD) should be based on absolute risk; however, current risk equations are based on single measurements of risk factors. We aimed to assess whether two measurements of blood pressure and lipids improves the prediction of cardiovascular risk compared to one measurement.METHODS AND RESULTS: We used sex-specific Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the risk of first CVD event in 2385 participants of the Framingham Offspring Study attending both the second and third visits. We estimated the effects on risk prediction of using the average of two measurements of blood pressure, total cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol compared to using one measurement of the risk factors. We found that these risk factors were each markedly more predictive of CVD when the average of two measurements was used rather than one measurement and age was less predictive of CVD. There were small improvements in the overall model fit, discrimination, and calibration. Reclassification also showed small improvements across the risk spectrum (net reclassification information, NRI, for women 3.0{\%}, 95{\%} CI -0.9 to 24.8{\%}; NRI for men 4.0{\%}, 95{\%} CI -2.2 to 14.1{\%}) and possibly greater improvements for intermediate-risk individuals (NRI for women 32.3{\%}, 95{\%} CI -21.9 to 46.8{\%}; NRI for men 16.0{\%}, 95{\%} CI -3.3 to 43{\%}).CONCLUSIONS: Averaging two measurements of blood pressure and lipids results in marked increases in the predictiveness of these risk factors and smaller improvements in the overall prediction of cardiovascular risk including reclassification.",
author = "Katy Bell and Andrew Hayen and Kevin McGeechan and Bruce Neal and Les Irwig",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1177/1741826711424494",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "1474--85",
journal = "European Journal of Preventive Cardiology",
issn = "1350-6277",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

Effects of additional blood pressure and lipid measurements on the prediction of cardiovascular risk. / Bell, Katy; Hayen, Andrew; McGeechan, Kevin; Neal, Bruce; Irwig, Les.

In: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, Vol. 19, No. 6, 12.2012, p. 1474-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of additional blood pressure and lipid measurements on the prediction of cardiovascular risk

AU - Bell, Katy

AU - Hayen, Andrew

AU - McGeechan, Kevin

AU - Neal, Bruce

AU - Irwig, Les

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend that decisions to start preventative therapy for cardiovascular disease (CVD) should be based on absolute risk; however, current risk equations are based on single measurements of risk factors. We aimed to assess whether two measurements of blood pressure and lipids improves the prediction of cardiovascular risk compared to one measurement.METHODS AND RESULTS: We used sex-specific Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the risk of first CVD event in 2385 participants of the Framingham Offspring Study attending both the second and third visits. We estimated the effects on risk prediction of using the average of two measurements of blood pressure, total cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol compared to using one measurement of the risk factors. We found that these risk factors were each markedly more predictive of CVD when the average of two measurements was used rather than one measurement and age was less predictive of CVD. There were small improvements in the overall model fit, discrimination, and calibration. Reclassification also showed small improvements across the risk spectrum (net reclassification information, NRI, for women 3.0%, 95% CI -0.9 to 24.8%; NRI for men 4.0%, 95% CI -2.2 to 14.1%) and possibly greater improvements for intermediate-risk individuals (NRI for women 32.3%, 95% CI -21.9 to 46.8%; NRI for men 16.0%, 95% CI -3.3 to 43%).CONCLUSIONS: Averaging two measurements of blood pressure and lipids results in marked increases in the predictiveness of these risk factors and smaller improvements in the overall prediction of cardiovascular risk including reclassification.

AB - BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend that decisions to start preventative therapy for cardiovascular disease (CVD) should be based on absolute risk; however, current risk equations are based on single measurements of risk factors. We aimed to assess whether two measurements of blood pressure and lipids improves the prediction of cardiovascular risk compared to one measurement.METHODS AND RESULTS: We used sex-specific Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the risk of first CVD event in 2385 participants of the Framingham Offspring Study attending both the second and third visits. We estimated the effects on risk prediction of using the average of two measurements of blood pressure, total cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol compared to using one measurement of the risk factors. We found that these risk factors were each markedly more predictive of CVD when the average of two measurements was used rather than one measurement and age was less predictive of CVD. There were small improvements in the overall model fit, discrimination, and calibration. Reclassification also showed small improvements across the risk spectrum (net reclassification information, NRI, for women 3.0%, 95% CI -0.9 to 24.8%; NRI for men 4.0%, 95% CI -2.2 to 14.1%) and possibly greater improvements for intermediate-risk individuals (NRI for women 32.3%, 95% CI -21.9 to 46.8%; NRI for men 16.0%, 95% CI -3.3 to 43%).CONCLUSIONS: Averaging two measurements of blood pressure and lipids results in marked increases in the predictiveness of these risk factors and smaller improvements in the overall prediction of cardiovascular risk including reclassification.

U2 - 10.1177/1741826711424494

DO - 10.1177/1741826711424494

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 1474

EP - 1485

JO - European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

JF - European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

SN - 1350-6277

IS - 6

ER -