Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Educating Future Lawyers for Co-Intelligence: A Proposal for a Third Pillar in Legal Education Based on a Comparative Study of the U.S. and Australian Approaches

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This Article examines the transformative implications of artificial intelligence (AI) on legal education, focusing on recent developments in the United States and Australia. Through a critical analysis of AI's current role in legal practice and its integration into legal curricula, the Article identifies key challenges and opportunities for legal educators and students. It makes a bold case for fundamentally restructuring legal education by introducing a third pillar--AI proficiency--alongside the two traditional pillars of substantive legal knowledge and skills training. Specifically, it advocates for embedding AI across both doctrinal and skills-based courses to develop practical competencies, foster critical thinking, and raise ethical awareness about its use. It further calls for the development of specialized AI courses and domain-specific AI tutors to better equip future lawyers for an AI-enhanced legal landscape. Ultimately, the Article urges law schools to take proactive steps in preparing co-intelligent lawyers capable of working ethically and effectively alongside AI in a rapidly evolving profession.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)245-300
Number of pages56
JournalWisconsin International Law Journal
Volume43
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Educating Future Lawyers for Co-Intelligence: A Proposal for a Third Pillar in Legal Education Based on a Comparative Study of the U.S. and Australian Approaches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this