Dying Safely

Magnolia Cardona, Ken Hillman

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The burden of deaths due to noncommunicable disease, particularly in the elderly, is projected to rise from 59% in 2002 to 69% in 2030. The ageing population has increased the use of medical technology and life support systems for the support of elderly complex cases—the so-called “sick elderly.” Public expectations believe modern medicine and its associated miracles can prolong life almost indefinitely. Sophisticated technology and the way media portrays the latest miracles generates unrealistic expectations by relatives and often causes potential conflict at the end of life (EoL). The medicalization of death and dying, despite its inevitability has contributed to the disappearance of the concept of a dignified natural death. Dying and death are seen as the ultimate challenge for successful ageing or as a failure of medicine if doctors cannot offer hope of recovery. Unfortunately, in many terminal cases, efforts are made to prolong life under pressure from families as well as the culture of acute hospitals and their concentration on “curing.” Clinicians are often reluctant to recommend limitations of treatment and instead, often administer inappropriate treatment in the face of futility.

This chapter is not about assisted dying, euthanasia, nor about the “right to die.” It is about recognition of dying by clinicians; acceptance of death as a natural part of the cycle of life; understanding what constitutes a “good death”; considering the ethical aspects of futile interventions; and reviewing best practice in providing quality of EoL. We discuss the role of doctors, nurses, and the health system in supporting patients and family through the transition.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTextbook of Rapid Response Systems: Concept and Implementation
EditorsMichael A. DeVita, Ken Hillman, Rinaldo Bellomo, Mandy Odell, Daryl A. Jones, Bradford D. Winters, Geoffrey K. Lighthall
Place of PublicationCham
PublisherSpringer
Chapter27
Pages289-299
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-319-39391-9
ISBN (Print)978-3-319-39389-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hope
Life Support Systems
Right to Die
Medicalization
Medical Futility
Technology
Modern 1601-history
Euthanasia
Nurse's Role
Life Cycle Stages
Practice Guidelines
Quality of Life
Medicine
Pressure
Health
Therapeutics
Population
Conflict (Psychology)

Cite this

Cardona, M., & Hillman, K. (2017). Dying Safely. In M. A. DeVita, K. Hillman, R. Bellomo, M. Odell, D. A. Jones, B. D. Winters, & G. K. Lighthall (Eds.), Textbook of Rapid Response Systems: Concept and Implementation (pp. 289-299). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39391-9_27
Cardona, Magnolia ; Hillman, Ken. / Dying Safely. Textbook of Rapid Response Systems: Concept and Implementation. editor / Michael A. DeVita ; Ken Hillman ; Rinaldo Bellomo ; Mandy Odell ; Daryl A. Jones ; Bradford D. Winters ; Geoffrey K. Lighthall. Cham : Springer, 2017. pp. 289-299
@inbook{4949eee997c649ceaabdefffa2f3cf24,
title = "Dying Safely",
abstract = "The burden of deaths due to noncommunicable disease, particularly in the elderly, is projected to rise from 59{\%} in 2002 to 69{\%} in 2030. The ageing population has increased the use of medical technology and life support systems for the support of elderly complex cases—the so-called “sick elderly.” Public expectations believe modern medicine and its associated miracles can prolong life almost indefinitely. Sophisticated technology and the way media portrays the latest miracles generates unrealistic expectations by relatives and often causes potential conflict at the end of life (EoL). The medicalization of death and dying, despite its inevitability has contributed to the disappearance of the concept of a dignified natural death. Dying and death are seen as the ultimate challenge for successful ageing or as a failure of medicine if doctors cannot offer hope of recovery. Unfortunately, in many terminal cases, efforts are made to prolong life under pressure from families as well as the culture of acute hospitals and their concentration on “curing.” Clinicians are often reluctant to recommend limitations of treatment and instead, often administer inappropriate treatment in the face of futility.This chapter is not about assisted dying, euthanasia, nor about the “right to die.” It is about recognition of dying by clinicians; acceptance of death as a natural part of the cycle of life; understanding what constitutes a “good death”; considering the ethical aspects of futile interventions; and reviewing best practice in providing quality of EoL. We discuss the role of doctors, nurses, and the health system in supporting patients and family through the transition.",
author = "Magnolia Cardona and Ken Hillman",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-39391-9_27",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-39389-6",
pages = "289--299",
editor = "DeVita, {Michael A.} and Ken Hillman and Rinaldo Bellomo and Mandy Odell and Jones, {Daryl A.} and Winters, {Bradford D.} and Lighthall, {Geoffrey K.}",
booktitle = "Textbook of Rapid Response Systems: Concept and Implementation",
publisher = "Springer",
address = "Germany",

}

Cardona, M & Hillman, K 2017, Dying Safely. in MA DeVita, K Hillman, R Bellomo, M Odell, DA Jones, BD Winters & GK Lighthall (eds), Textbook of Rapid Response Systems: Concept and Implementation. Springer, Cham, pp. 289-299. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39391-9_27

Dying Safely. / Cardona, Magnolia; Hillman, Ken.

Textbook of Rapid Response Systems: Concept and Implementation. ed. / Michael A. DeVita; Ken Hillman; Rinaldo Bellomo; Mandy Odell; Daryl A. Jones; Bradford D. Winters; Geoffrey K. Lighthall. Cham : Springer, 2017. p. 289-299.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Dying Safely

AU - Cardona, Magnolia

AU - Hillman, Ken

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The burden of deaths due to noncommunicable disease, particularly in the elderly, is projected to rise from 59% in 2002 to 69% in 2030. The ageing population has increased the use of medical technology and life support systems for the support of elderly complex cases—the so-called “sick elderly.” Public expectations believe modern medicine and its associated miracles can prolong life almost indefinitely. Sophisticated technology and the way media portrays the latest miracles generates unrealistic expectations by relatives and often causes potential conflict at the end of life (EoL). The medicalization of death and dying, despite its inevitability has contributed to the disappearance of the concept of a dignified natural death. Dying and death are seen as the ultimate challenge for successful ageing or as a failure of medicine if doctors cannot offer hope of recovery. Unfortunately, in many terminal cases, efforts are made to prolong life under pressure from families as well as the culture of acute hospitals and their concentration on “curing.” Clinicians are often reluctant to recommend limitations of treatment and instead, often administer inappropriate treatment in the face of futility.This chapter is not about assisted dying, euthanasia, nor about the “right to die.” It is about recognition of dying by clinicians; acceptance of death as a natural part of the cycle of life; understanding what constitutes a “good death”; considering the ethical aspects of futile interventions; and reviewing best practice in providing quality of EoL. We discuss the role of doctors, nurses, and the health system in supporting patients and family through the transition.

AB - The burden of deaths due to noncommunicable disease, particularly in the elderly, is projected to rise from 59% in 2002 to 69% in 2030. The ageing population has increased the use of medical technology and life support systems for the support of elderly complex cases—the so-called “sick elderly.” Public expectations believe modern medicine and its associated miracles can prolong life almost indefinitely. Sophisticated technology and the way media portrays the latest miracles generates unrealistic expectations by relatives and often causes potential conflict at the end of life (EoL). The medicalization of death and dying, despite its inevitability has contributed to the disappearance of the concept of a dignified natural death. Dying and death are seen as the ultimate challenge for successful ageing or as a failure of medicine if doctors cannot offer hope of recovery. Unfortunately, in many terminal cases, efforts are made to prolong life under pressure from families as well as the culture of acute hospitals and their concentration on “curing.” Clinicians are often reluctant to recommend limitations of treatment and instead, often administer inappropriate treatment in the face of futility.This chapter is not about assisted dying, euthanasia, nor about the “right to die.” It is about recognition of dying by clinicians; acceptance of death as a natural part of the cycle of life; understanding what constitutes a “good death”; considering the ethical aspects of futile interventions; and reviewing best practice in providing quality of EoL. We discuss the role of doctors, nurses, and the health system in supporting patients and family through the transition.

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-39391-9_27

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-39391-9_27

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-319-39389-6

SP - 289

EP - 299

BT - Textbook of Rapid Response Systems: Concept and Implementation

A2 - DeVita, Michael A.

A2 - Hillman, Ken

A2 - Bellomo, Rinaldo

A2 - Odell, Mandy

A2 - Jones, Daryl A.

A2 - Winters, Bradford D.

A2 - Lighthall, Geoffrey K.

PB - Springer

CY - Cham

ER -

Cardona M, Hillman K. Dying Safely. In DeVita MA, Hillman K, Bellomo R, Odell M, Jones DA, Winters BD, Lighthall GK, editors, Textbook of Rapid Response Systems: Concept and Implementation. Cham: Springer. 2017. p. 289-299 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39391-9_27