Dual computer monitors to increase efficiency of conducting systematic reviews

Zhen Wang, Noor Asi, Tarig A. Elraiyah, Abd Moain Abu Dabrh, Chaitanya Undavalli, Paul Glasziou, Victor Montori, Mohammad Hassan Murad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Systematic reviews (SRs) are the cornerstone of evidence-based medicine. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of using two computer screens on the efficiency of conducting SRs. Study Design and Setting: A cohort of reviewers before and after using dual monitors were compared with a control group that did not use dual monitors. The outcomes were time spent for abstract screening, full-text screening and data extraction, and inter-rater agreement. We adopted multivariate difference-in-differences linear regression models. Results: A total of 60 SRs conducted by 54 reviewers were included in this analysis. We found a significant reduction of 23.81 minutes per article in data extraction in the intervention group relative to the control group (95% confidence interval: -46.03, -1.58, P = 0.04), which was a 36.85% reduction in time. There was no significant difference in time spent on abstract screening, full-text screening, or inter-rater agreement between the two groups. Conclusion: Using dual monitors when conducting SRs is associated with significant reduction of time spent on data extraction. No significant difference was observed on time spent on abstract screening or full-text screening. Using dual monitors is one strategy that may improve the efficiency of conducting SRs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1353-1357
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume67
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2014

Fingerprint

Linear Models
Control Groups
Evidence-Based Medicine
Confidence Intervals

Cite this

Wang, Z., Asi, N., Elraiyah, T. A., Dabrh, A. M. A., Undavalli, C., Glasziou, P., ... Murad, M. H. (2014). Dual computer monitors to increase efficiency of conducting systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(12), 1353-1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.011
Wang, Zhen ; Asi, Noor ; Elraiyah, Tarig A. ; Dabrh, Abd Moain Abu ; Undavalli, Chaitanya ; Glasziou, Paul ; Montori, Victor ; Murad, Mohammad Hassan. / Dual computer monitors to increase efficiency of conducting systematic reviews. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2014 ; Vol. 67, No. 12. pp. 1353-1357.
@article{5254b53470be40888af0bc2228609203,
title = "Dual computer monitors to increase efficiency of conducting systematic reviews",
abstract = "Objective: Systematic reviews (SRs) are the cornerstone of evidence-based medicine. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of using two computer screens on the efficiency of conducting SRs. Study Design and Setting: A cohort of reviewers before and after using dual monitors were compared with a control group that did not use dual monitors. The outcomes were time spent for abstract screening, full-text screening and data extraction, and inter-rater agreement. We adopted multivariate difference-in-differences linear regression models. Results: A total of 60 SRs conducted by 54 reviewers were included in this analysis. We found a significant reduction of 23.81 minutes per article in data extraction in the intervention group relative to the control group (95{\%} confidence interval: -46.03, -1.58, P = 0.04), which was a 36.85{\%} reduction in time. There was no significant difference in time spent on abstract screening, full-text screening, or inter-rater agreement between the two groups. Conclusion: Using dual monitors when conducting SRs is associated with significant reduction of time spent on data extraction. No significant difference was observed on time spent on abstract screening or full-text screening. Using dual monitors is one strategy that may improve the efficiency of conducting SRs.",
author = "Zhen Wang and Noor Asi and Elraiyah, {Tarig A.} and Dabrh, {Abd Moain Abu} and Chaitanya Undavalli and Paul Glasziou and Victor Montori and Murad, {Mohammad Hassan}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.011",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "1353--1357",
journal = "Journal of Chronic Diseases",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "12",

}

Wang, Z, Asi, N, Elraiyah, TA, Dabrh, AMA, Undavalli, C, Glasziou, P, Montori, V & Murad, MH 2014, 'Dual computer monitors to increase efficiency of conducting systematic reviews' Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 1353-1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.011

Dual computer monitors to increase efficiency of conducting systematic reviews. / Wang, Zhen; Asi, Noor; Elraiyah, Tarig A.; Dabrh, Abd Moain Abu; Undavalli, Chaitanya; Glasziou, Paul; Montori, Victor; Murad, Mohammad Hassan.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 67, No. 12, 01.12.2014, p. 1353-1357.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dual computer monitors to increase efficiency of conducting systematic reviews

AU - Wang, Zhen

AU - Asi, Noor

AU - Elraiyah, Tarig A.

AU - Dabrh, Abd Moain Abu

AU - Undavalli, Chaitanya

AU - Glasziou, Paul

AU - Montori, Victor

AU - Murad, Mohammad Hassan

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - Objective: Systematic reviews (SRs) are the cornerstone of evidence-based medicine. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of using two computer screens on the efficiency of conducting SRs. Study Design and Setting: A cohort of reviewers before and after using dual monitors were compared with a control group that did not use dual monitors. The outcomes were time spent for abstract screening, full-text screening and data extraction, and inter-rater agreement. We adopted multivariate difference-in-differences linear regression models. Results: A total of 60 SRs conducted by 54 reviewers were included in this analysis. We found a significant reduction of 23.81 minutes per article in data extraction in the intervention group relative to the control group (95% confidence interval: -46.03, -1.58, P = 0.04), which was a 36.85% reduction in time. There was no significant difference in time spent on abstract screening, full-text screening, or inter-rater agreement between the two groups. Conclusion: Using dual monitors when conducting SRs is associated with significant reduction of time spent on data extraction. No significant difference was observed on time spent on abstract screening or full-text screening. Using dual monitors is one strategy that may improve the efficiency of conducting SRs.

AB - Objective: Systematic reviews (SRs) are the cornerstone of evidence-based medicine. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of using two computer screens on the efficiency of conducting SRs. Study Design and Setting: A cohort of reviewers before and after using dual monitors were compared with a control group that did not use dual monitors. The outcomes were time spent for abstract screening, full-text screening and data extraction, and inter-rater agreement. We adopted multivariate difference-in-differences linear regression models. Results: A total of 60 SRs conducted by 54 reviewers were included in this analysis. We found a significant reduction of 23.81 minutes per article in data extraction in the intervention group relative to the control group (95% confidence interval: -46.03, -1.58, P = 0.04), which was a 36.85% reduction in time. There was no significant difference in time spent on abstract screening, full-text screening, or inter-rater agreement between the two groups. Conclusion: Using dual monitors when conducting SRs is associated with significant reduction of time spent on data extraction. No significant difference was observed on time spent on abstract screening or full-text screening. Using dual monitors is one strategy that may improve the efficiency of conducting SRs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922480172&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.011

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.011

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 1353

EP - 1357

JO - Journal of Chronic Diseases

JF - Journal of Chronic Diseases

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 12

ER -