Does trading of retail investors cause the January effect?

Debapriya Jojo Paul, Julia Henker

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We dispel the belief that the January effect, anomalous returns to small-capitalization stocks in the month of January, is a retail investor trading phenomenon. We use a market with a July-June tax year, Australia, to separate potential tax loss selling from other anomalous returns. Our results indicate that a January effect does persist in the Australian market, but it is not a result of retail investor trading. Furthermore, retail investor trading does not have a convincingly significant effect independent of market capitalization. Our study is important as a direct test of the assumption that retail trading causes market anomalies.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 2011 Financial Management Association Meeting
EditorsJ Kose
Place of PublicationFlorida, USA
PublisherFinancial Management Association
Pages1-37
Number of pages37
Publication statusPublished - 2011
EventFinancial Management Association 2011 Annual Meeting - Denver, Colorado, United States
Duration: 20 Oct 201122 Oct 2011
http://www.fma.org/

Conference

ConferenceFinancial Management Association 2011 Annual Meeting
CountryUnited States
CityColorado
Period20/10/1122/10/11
Internet address

Fingerprint

Investors
Retail
January effect
Capitalization
Tax-loss selling
Tax
Market capitalization
Market anomalies

Cite this

Paul, D. J., & Henker, J. (2011). Does trading of retail investors cause the January effect? In J. Kose (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2011 Financial Management Association Meeting (pp. 1-37). Florida, USA: Financial Management Association .
Paul, Debapriya Jojo ; Henker, Julia. / Does trading of retail investors cause the January effect?. Proceedings of the 2011 Financial Management Association Meeting. editor / J Kose. Florida, USA : Financial Management Association , 2011. pp. 1-37
@inproceedings{64db10c8e4a64c42b5637d59fd9e5444,
title = "Does trading of retail investors cause the January effect?",
abstract = "We dispel the belief that the January effect, anomalous returns to small-capitalization stocks in the month of January, is a retail investor trading phenomenon. We use a market with a July-June tax year, Australia, to separate potential tax loss selling from other anomalous returns. Our results indicate that a January effect does persist in the Australian market, but it is not a result of retail investor trading. Furthermore, retail investor trading does not have a convincingly significant effect independent of market capitalization. Our study is important as a direct test of the assumption that retail trading causes market anomalies.",
author = "Paul, {Debapriya Jojo} and Julia Henker",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
pages = "1--37",
editor = "J Kose",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2011 Financial Management Association Meeting",
publisher = "Financial Management Association",

}

Paul, DJ & Henker, J 2011, Does trading of retail investors cause the January effect? in J Kose (ed.), Proceedings of the 2011 Financial Management Association Meeting. Financial Management Association , Florida, USA, pp. 1-37, Financial Management Association 2011 Annual Meeting, Colorado, United States, 20/10/11.

Does trading of retail investors cause the January effect? / Paul, Debapriya Jojo; Henker, Julia.

Proceedings of the 2011 Financial Management Association Meeting. ed. / J Kose. Florida, USA : Financial Management Association , 2011. p. 1-37.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Does trading of retail investors cause the January effect?

AU - Paul, Debapriya Jojo

AU - Henker, Julia

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - We dispel the belief that the January effect, anomalous returns to small-capitalization stocks in the month of January, is a retail investor trading phenomenon. We use a market with a July-June tax year, Australia, to separate potential tax loss selling from other anomalous returns. Our results indicate that a January effect does persist in the Australian market, but it is not a result of retail investor trading. Furthermore, retail investor trading does not have a convincingly significant effect independent of market capitalization. Our study is important as a direct test of the assumption that retail trading causes market anomalies.

AB - We dispel the belief that the January effect, anomalous returns to small-capitalization stocks in the month of January, is a retail investor trading phenomenon. We use a market with a July-June tax year, Australia, to separate potential tax loss selling from other anomalous returns. Our results indicate that a January effect does persist in the Australian market, but it is not a result of retail investor trading. Furthermore, retail investor trading does not have a convincingly significant effect independent of market capitalization. Our study is important as a direct test of the assumption that retail trading causes market anomalies.

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 1

EP - 37

BT - Proceedings of the 2011 Financial Management Association Meeting

A2 - Kose, J

PB - Financial Management Association

CY - Florida, USA

ER -

Paul DJ, Henker J. Does trading of retail investors cause the January effect? In Kose J, editor, Proceedings of the 2011 Financial Management Association Meeting. Florida, USA: Financial Management Association . 2011. p. 1-37