Does trade liberalization make the Porter hypothesis less relevant?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The Porter Hypothesis refers to the idea that environmental regulations push firms into developing and adopting new technologies. Controversially, it asserts that the investments in new technology that the firms are pushed into making would be profitable irrespective of whether the regulations had have been put in place. In this paper a simple model is used to illustrate a Porter Hypothesis situation. This framework allows us to establish what conditions are required for a tariff reduction to be an alternative to environmental regulations. That is, we look at a case where, under tariff protection, the firm will only invest in new technology when the environmental regulation is put in place, but in the absence of tariffs, the firm will invest in new technology irrespective of whether the environmental regulation is in place. © Copyright International Journal of Business and Economics, 2003

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)129-140
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Business and Economics
Volume2
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Trade liberalization
Porter hypothesis
Environmental regulation
Tariffs
Economics

Cite this

@article{936ba89f28ab4c73a77b082833914791,
title = "Does trade liberalization make the Porter hypothesis less relevant?",
abstract = "The Porter Hypothesis refers to the idea that environmental regulations push firms into developing and adopting new technologies. Controversially, it asserts that the investments in new technology that the firms are pushed into making would be profitable irrespective of whether the regulations had have been put in place. In this paper a simple model is used to illustrate a Porter Hypothesis situation. This framework allows us to establish what conditions are required for a tariff reduction to be an alternative to environmental regulations. That is, we look at a case where, under tariff protection, the firm will only invest in new technology when the environmental regulation is put in place, but in the absence of tariffs, the firm will invest in new technology irrespective of whether the environmental regulation is in place. {\circledC} Copyright International Journal of Business and Economics, 2003",
author = "Neil Campbell",
year = "2003",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "129--140",
journal = "International Journal of Business and Economics",
issn = "1607-0704",
number = "2",

}

Does trade liberalization make the Porter hypothesis less relevant? / Campbell, Neil.

In: International Journal of Business and Economics, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2003, p. 129-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does trade liberalization make the Porter hypothesis less relevant?

AU - Campbell, Neil

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - The Porter Hypothesis refers to the idea that environmental regulations push firms into developing and adopting new technologies. Controversially, it asserts that the investments in new technology that the firms are pushed into making would be profitable irrespective of whether the regulations had have been put in place. In this paper a simple model is used to illustrate a Porter Hypothesis situation. This framework allows us to establish what conditions are required for a tariff reduction to be an alternative to environmental regulations. That is, we look at a case where, under tariff protection, the firm will only invest in new technology when the environmental regulation is put in place, but in the absence of tariffs, the firm will invest in new technology irrespective of whether the environmental regulation is in place. © Copyright International Journal of Business and Economics, 2003

AB - The Porter Hypothesis refers to the idea that environmental regulations push firms into developing and adopting new technologies. Controversially, it asserts that the investments in new technology that the firms are pushed into making would be profitable irrespective of whether the regulations had have been put in place. In this paper a simple model is used to illustrate a Porter Hypothesis situation. This framework allows us to establish what conditions are required for a tariff reduction to be an alternative to environmental regulations. That is, we look at a case where, under tariff protection, the firm will only invest in new technology when the environmental regulation is put in place, but in the absence of tariffs, the firm will invest in new technology irrespective of whether the environmental regulation is in place. © Copyright International Journal of Business and Economics, 2003

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 129

EP - 140

JO - International Journal of Business and Economics

JF - International Journal of Business and Economics

SN - 1607-0704

IS - 2

ER -