TY - JOUR
T1 - Does the uncertainty of firm-level fundamentals help explain cross-sectional differences in liquidity commonality?
AU - Isshaq, Zangina
AU - Faff, Robert
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier B.V.
Copyright:
Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/7/1
Y1 - 2016/7/1
N2 - Our goal is to better understand the economic sources of commonality in liquidity. To this end, we argue that a firm with low (high) volatility in its "fundamental" profitability will have a higher (lower) liquidity commonality because it is more (less) likely to serve as reference stock in the setting of cross-asset learning about fundamentals. As predicted, we find that commonality in liquidity is negatively related to profitability volatility. This negative relation holds after controlling for correlated trading, size, book-to-market effects, idiosyncratic volatility, stock returns, and managerial income smoothing.
AB - Our goal is to better understand the economic sources of commonality in liquidity. To this end, we argue that a firm with low (high) volatility in its "fundamental" profitability will have a higher (lower) liquidity commonality because it is more (less) likely to serve as reference stock in the setting of cross-asset learning about fundamentals. As predicted, we find that commonality in liquidity is negatively related to profitability volatility. This negative relation holds after controlling for correlated trading, size, book-to-market effects, idiosyncratic volatility, stock returns, and managerial income smoothing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963819746&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.02.012
DO - 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.02.012
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84963819746
SN - 0378-4266
VL - 68
SP - 153
EP - 161
JO - Journal of Banking and Finance
JF - Journal of Banking and Finance
ER -