Abstract
In an earlier article, the concept of fair basing in Australian patent law was
described as a "problem child. - often unruly and unpredictable in practice,
but nevertheless understandable and useful in policy terms. The article
traced the development of several different branches of patent law that wem
swept under the nomenclature of Tair basing" in Britain in 1949. It then went
on to examine the adoption of fair basis into Australian law, the modem
interpretation of the requirement, and its problems. This article provides an
update. After briefty recapping on the relevant historical issues, it examines
the recent Lockwood "internal" fair basing case in the Federal and High
Courts.
described as a "problem child. - often unruly and unpredictable in practice,
but nevertheless understandable and useful in policy terms. The article
traced the development of several different branches of patent law that wem
swept under the nomenclature of Tair basing" in Britain in 1949. It then went
on to examine the adoption of fair basis into Australian law, the modem
interpretation of the requirement, and its problems. This article provides an
update. After briefty recapping on the relevant historical issues, it examines
the recent Lockwood "internal" fair basing case in the Federal and High
Courts.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 210-230 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Australian Intellectual Property Journal |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2005 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Does the fair basing 'problem child' escape Lockwood?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver