Does legislation reduce harm to doctors who prescribe for themselves?

Margaret Kay, Chris B. Del Mar, Geoffrey Mitchell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To consider the issue of legislation restricting self prescribing by doctors. Method: Searches of the medical literature in Medline, Australian Medical Index and CINAHL using the terms 'medical', 'legislation' and 'physician impairment' from 1966-2003 supplemented by checking citations of review papers. Results: We found 144 articles, although no trials of legislation. The remaining research was inadequate to answer the question of whether restricting self prescribing reduces doctor impairment. However, descriptive studies suggest that impairment attributed to self prescribing is most often from self administration, which is not altered by legislation to restrict self prescribing. Discussion: There are important theoretical adverse consequences of legislation that restrict self prescribing. Apparently self evident legislation may be counter productive. The need for doctors to have an independent general practitioner is reinforced.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)94-96
Number of pages3
JournalAustralian Family Physician
Volume34
Issue number1-2
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Legislation
Physician Impairment
Medical Legislation
Self Administration
General Practitioners
Research

Cite this

Kay, Margaret ; Del Mar, Chris B. ; Mitchell, Geoffrey. / Does legislation reduce harm to doctors who prescribe for themselves?. In: Australian Family Physician. 2005 ; Vol. 34, No. 1-2. pp. 94-96.
@article{07162adb7c9b4180a4426d369be72c3c,
title = "Does legislation reduce harm to doctors who prescribe for themselves?",
abstract = "Objective: To consider the issue of legislation restricting self prescribing by doctors. Method: Searches of the medical literature in Medline, Australian Medical Index and CINAHL using the terms 'medical', 'legislation' and 'physician impairment' from 1966-2003 supplemented by checking citations of review papers. Results: We found 144 articles, although no trials of legislation. The remaining research was inadequate to answer the question of whether restricting self prescribing reduces doctor impairment. However, descriptive studies suggest that impairment attributed to self prescribing is most often from self administration, which is not altered by legislation to restrict self prescribing. Discussion: There are important theoretical adverse consequences of legislation that restrict self prescribing. Apparently self evident legislation may be counter productive. The need for doctors to have an independent general practitioner is reinforced.",
author = "Margaret Kay and {Del Mar}, {Chris B.} and Geoffrey Mitchell",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "94--96",
journal = "Australian Family Physician",
issn = "0300-8495",
publisher = "Royal Australian College of General Practitioners",
number = "1-2",

}

Does legislation reduce harm to doctors who prescribe for themselves? / Kay, Margaret; Del Mar, Chris B.; Mitchell, Geoffrey.

In: Australian Family Physician, Vol. 34, No. 1-2, 2005, p. 94-96.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does legislation reduce harm to doctors who prescribe for themselves?

AU - Kay, Margaret

AU - Del Mar, Chris B.

AU - Mitchell, Geoffrey

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Objective: To consider the issue of legislation restricting self prescribing by doctors. Method: Searches of the medical literature in Medline, Australian Medical Index and CINAHL using the terms 'medical', 'legislation' and 'physician impairment' from 1966-2003 supplemented by checking citations of review papers. Results: We found 144 articles, although no trials of legislation. The remaining research was inadequate to answer the question of whether restricting self prescribing reduces doctor impairment. However, descriptive studies suggest that impairment attributed to self prescribing is most often from self administration, which is not altered by legislation to restrict self prescribing. Discussion: There are important theoretical adverse consequences of legislation that restrict self prescribing. Apparently self evident legislation may be counter productive. The need for doctors to have an independent general practitioner is reinforced.

AB - Objective: To consider the issue of legislation restricting self prescribing by doctors. Method: Searches of the medical literature in Medline, Australian Medical Index and CINAHL using the terms 'medical', 'legislation' and 'physician impairment' from 1966-2003 supplemented by checking citations of review papers. Results: We found 144 articles, although no trials of legislation. The remaining research was inadequate to answer the question of whether restricting self prescribing reduces doctor impairment. However, descriptive studies suggest that impairment attributed to self prescribing is most often from self administration, which is not altered by legislation to restrict self prescribing. Discussion: There are important theoretical adverse consequences of legislation that restrict self prescribing. Apparently self evident legislation may be counter productive. The need for doctors to have an independent general practitioner is reinforced.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16844375892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 94

EP - 96

JO - Australian Family Physician

JF - Australian Family Physician

SN - 0300-8495

IS - 1-2

ER -