Does digital scholarship through online lectures affect student learning?

Shelley Kinash, Diana Knight, Matthew McLean

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

University lectures are increasingly recorded or reproduced and made available to students online. This paper aggregates and critically reviews the associated literature, thematically organised in response to four questions. In response to the first question - does student attendance decrease when online content is made available - research indicates that students primarily use digital content for review and revision rather than as a substitute for on-campus attendance. Analysis of the research in response to the second question - is achievement affected when attendance is face-to-face versus online - revealed no empirically supported significant difference. The third question was whether online content is better suited to some pedagogical tasks than others. A predominant theme in the literature is that digital content has potential as a disruptive pedagogy, accelerating an overall shift from didactic lecture to constructivist learning. Analysis revealed a research gap around the fourth question - is there evidence that some online formats are particularly suited to advancing learning. The few published comparative studies revealed contradictory results. Overall conclusions from the combined questions are that online digital content is a worthwhile learning and teaching pursuit and discipline and context must be considered in designing the particular approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)129-139
Number of pages11
JournalEducational Technology and Society
Volume18
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Students
learning
student
Teaching
didactics
evidence
literature

Cite this

Kinash, Shelley ; Knight, Diana ; McLean, Matthew. / Does digital scholarship through online lectures affect student learning?. In: Educational Technology and Society. 2015 ; Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 129-139.
@article{2ecc0cbd4b204c98be2f3a92d82619ed,
title = "Does digital scholarship through online lectures affect student learning?",
abstract = "University lectures are increasingly recorded or reproduced and made available to students online. This paper aggregates and critically reviews the associated literature, thematically organised in response to four questions. In response to the first question - does student attendance decrease when online content is made available - research indicates that students primarily use digital content for review and revision rather than as a substitute for on-campus attendance. Analysis of the research in response to the second question - is achievement affected when attendance is face-to-face versus online - revealed no empirically supported significant difference. The third question was whether online content is better suited to some pedagogical tasks than others. A predominant theme in the literature is that digital content has potential as a disruptive pedagogy, accelerating an overall shift from didactic lecture to constructivist learning. Analysis revealed a research gap around the fourth question - is there evidence that some online formats are particularly suited to advancing learning. The few published comparative studies revealed contradictory results. Overall conclusions from the combined questions are that online digital content is a worthwhile learning and teaching pursuit and discipline and context must be considered in designing the particular approach.",
author = "Shelley Kinash and Diana Knight and Matthew McLean",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "129--139",
journal = "Educational Technology and Society",
issn = "1176-3647",
publisher = "IEEE Computer Society",
number = "2",

}

Kinash, S, Knight, D & McLean, M 2015, 'Does digital scholarship through online lectures affect student learning?' Educational Technology and Society, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 129-139.

Does digital scholarship through online lectures affect student learning? / Kinash, Shelley; Knight, Diana; McLean, Matthew.

In: Educational Technology and Society, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2015, p. 129-139.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does digital scholarship through online lectures affect student learning?

AU - Kinash, Shelley

AU - Knight, Diana

AU - McLean, Matthew

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - University lectures are increasingly recorded or reproduced and made available to students online. This paper aggregates and critically reviews the associated literature, thematically organised in response to four questions. In response to the first question - does student attendance decrease when online content is made available - research indicates that students primarily use digital content for review and revision rather than as a substitute for on-campus attendance. Analysis of the research in response to the second question - is achievement affected when attendance is face-to-face versus online - revealed no empirically supported significant difference. The third question was whether online content is better suited to some pedagogical tasks than others. A predominant theme in the literature is that digital content has potential as a disruptive pedagogy, accelerating an overall shift from didactic lecture to constructivist learning. Analysis revealed a research gap around the fourth question - is there evidence that some online formats are particularly suited to advancing learning. The few published comparative studies revealed contradictory results. Overall conclusions from the combined questions are that online digital content is a worthwhile learning and teaching pursuit and discipline and context must be considered in designing the particular approach.

AB - University lectures are increasingly recorded or reproduced and made available to students online. This paper aggregates and critically reviews the associated literature, thematically organised in response to four questions. In response to the first question - does student attendance decrease when online content is made available - research indicates that students primarily use digital content for review and revision rather than as a substitute for on-campus attendance. Analysis of the research in response to the second question - is achievement affected when attendance is face-to-face versus online - revealed no empirically supported significant difference. The third question was whether online content is better suited to some pedagogical tasks than others. A predominant theme in the literature is that digital content has potential as a disruptive pedagogy, accelerating an overall shift from didactic lecture to constructivist learning. Analysis revealed a research gap around the fourth question - is there evidence that some online formats are particularly suited to advancing learning. The few published comparative studies revealed contradictory results. Overall conclusions from the combined questions are that online digital content is a worthwhile learning and teaching pursuit and discipline and context must be considered in designing the particular approach.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930358192&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 129

EP - 139

JO - Educational Technology and Society

JF - Educational Technology and Society

SN - 1176-3647

IS - 2

ER -