Does daily proactivity affect well‐being? The moderating role of punitive supervision

Francesco Cangiano, Sharon K. Parker, Gillian Yeo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Proactive behavior (self‐initiated and future‐oriented actions to bring about change) has largely positive consequences for organizationally oriented outcomes such as job performance. Yet the outcomes of proactivity from a well‐being perspective have not been clearly considered. Drawing on self‐determination theory and the stressor‐detachment model, we propose two distinct paths by which proactivity affects individuals' daily well‐being. The first path is an energy‐generating pathway in which daily proactive behavior enhances end‐of‐work‐day vitality via perceived competence. The second is a strain pathway in which daily proactive behavior generates anxiety at work, which undermines the process of detachment from work. We argue that these pathways are shaped by the extent to which supervisors are prone to blaming employees for their mistakes (punitive supervision). We tested this model using a sample of 94 employees who completed surveys three times a day for between 5 and 7 days. Our multilevel analyses provide support for the proposed dual‐pathway model and suggest differential well‐being outcomes of daily proactive work behavior. Overall, when an individual behaves proactively at work, they are more likely to experience higher levels of daily perceived competence and vitality. However, these positive effects can exist in parallel with daily negative effects on end‐of‐workday anxiety, and hence bedtime detachment, but only when the supervisor is perceived to be punitive about mistakes.
LanguageEnglish
Pages59-72
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Organizational Behavior
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

supervision
well-being
Mental Competency
Anxiety
employee
anxiety
Multilevel Analysis
Personal Autonomy
job performance
self-determination
Pathway
Well-being
Supervision
Proactivity
energy
Proactive behavior
experience
Supervisors
Employees

Cite this

@article{0ad4adc5e0c044489635ff382c1f88e4,
title = "Does daily proactivity affect well‐being? The moderating role of punitive supervision",
abstract = "Proactive behavior (self‐initiated and future‐oriented actions to bring about change) has largely positive consequences for organizationally oriented outcomes such as job performance. Yet the outcomes of proactivity from a well‐being perspective have not been clearly considered. Drawing on self‐determination theory and the stressor‐detachment model, we propose two distinct paths by which proactivity affects individuals' daily well‐being. The first path is an energy‐generating pathway in which daily proactive behavior enhances end‐of‐work‐day vitality via perceived competence. The second is a strain pathway in which daily proactive behavior generates anxiety at work, which undermines the process of detachment from work. We argue that these pathways are shaped by the extent to which supervisors are prone to blaming employees for their mistakes (punitive supervision). We tested this model using a sample of 94 employees who completed surveys three times a day for between 5 and 7 days. Our multilevel analyses provide support for the proposed dual‐pathway model and suggest differential well‐being outcomes of daily proactive work behavior. Overall, when an individual behaves proactively at work, they are more likely to experience higher levels of daily perceived competence and vitality. However, these positive effects can exist in parallel with daily negative effects on end‐of‐workday anxiety, and hence bedtime detachment, but only when the supervisor is perceived to be punitive about mistakes.",
author = "Francesco Cangiano and Parker, {Sharon K.} and Gillian Yeo",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/job.2321",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "59--72",
journal = "Journal of Organizational Behavior",
issn = "0894-3796",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "1",

}

Does daily proactivity affect well‐being? The moderating role of punitive supervision. / Cangiano, Francesco; Parker, Sharon K.; Yeo, Gillian.

In: Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 40, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 59-72.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does daily proactivity affect well‐being? The moderating role of punitive supervision

AU - Cangiano, Francesco

AU - Parker, Sharon K.

AU - Yeo, Gillian

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Proactive behavior (self‐initiated and future‐oriented actions to bring about change) has largely positive consequences for organizationally oriented outcomes such as job performance. Yet the outcomes of proactivity from a well‐being perspective have not been clearly considered. Drawing on self‐determination theory and the stressor‐detachment model, we propose two distinct paths by which proactivity affects individuals' daily well‐being. The first path is an energy‐generating pathway in which daily proactive behavior enhances end‐of‐work‐day vitality via perceived competence. The second is a strain pathway in which daily proactive behavior generates anxiety at work, which undermines the process of detachment from work. We argue that these pathways are shaped by the extent to which supervisors are prone to blaming employees for their mistakes (punitive supervision). We tested this model using a sample of 94 employees who completed surveys three times a day for between 5 and 7 days. Our multilevel analyses provide support for the proposed dual‐pathway model and suggest differential well‐being outcomes of daily proactive work behavior. Overall, when an individual behaves proactively at work, they are more likely to experience higher levels of daily perceived competence and vitality. However, these positive effects can exist in parallel with daily negative effects on end‐of‐workday anxiety, and hence bedtime detachment, but only when the supervisor is perceived to be punitive about mistakes.

AB - Proactive behavior (self‐initiated and future‐oriented actions to bring about change) has largely positive consequences for organizationally oriented outcomes such as job performance. Yet the outcomes of proactivity from a well‐being perspective have not been clearly considered. Drawing on self‐determination theory and the stressor‐detachment model, we propose two distinct paths by which proactivity affects individuals' daily well‐being. The first path is an energy‐generating pathway in which daily proactive behavior enhances end‐of‐work‐day vitality via perceived competence. The second is a strain pathway in which daily proactive behavior generates anxiety at work, which undermines the process of detachment from work. We argue that these pathways are shaped by the extent to which supervisors are prone to blaming employees for their mistakes (punitive supervision). We tested this model using a sample of 94 employees who completed surveys three times a day for between 5 and 7 days. Our multilevel analyses provide support for the proposed dual‐pathway model and suggest differential well‐being outcomes of daily proactive work behavior. Overall, when an individual behaves proactively at work, they are more likely to experience higher levels of daily perceived competence and vitality. However, these positive effects can exist in parallel with daily negative effects on end‐of‐workday anxiety, and hence bedtime detachment, but only when the supervisor is perceived to be punitive about mistakes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060052134&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/job.2321

DO - 10.1002/job.2321

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 59

EP - 72

JO - Journal of Organizational Behavior

T2 - Journal of Organizational Behavior

JF - Journal of Organizational Behavior

SN - 0894-3796

IS - 1

ER -