Does adopting good corporate governance impact the cost of intermediated and non-intermediated debt?

Husam Aldamen, Keith Duncan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examines the impact of good corporate governance practices on the reported cost of debt for Australian listed companies. Prior research has established that governance lowers the cost of non-intermediated debt (Sengupta, 1998; Bhojraj and Sengupta, 2003; Ashbaugh-Skaife, 2006). We extend this analysis to the Australian corporate debt market which is dominated by intermediated or privately held debt. Our findings are consistent with the prior work and shows that increased corporate governance lowers cost of debt. However, when we split the sample companies into intermediated and non-intermediated debt sub-samples, we find this result only holds for the non-intermediated debt sub-sample. Furthermore, we find that small companies that adopt better corporate governance practices do not benefit through lower cost of debt. This raises questions about the merits of universal adoption of costly governance practices. 

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-76
Number of pages28
JournalAccounting and Finance
Volume52
Issue numberSUPPL.1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2012

Fingerprint

Corporate governance
Costs
Debt
Cost of debt
Governance
Small companies
Corporate debt
Listed companies

Cite this

@article{e1b6fb41e90f4b47b0cc807a895bade4,
title = "Does adopting good corporate governance impact the cost of intermediated and non-intermediated debt?",
abstract = "This study examines the impact of good corporate governance practices on the reported cost of debt for Australian listed companies. Prior research has established that governance lowers the cost of non-intermediated debt (Sengupta, 1998; Bhojraj and Sengupta, 2003; Ashbaugh-Skaife, 2006). We extend this analysis to the Australian corporate debt market which is dominated by intermediated or privately held debt. Our findings are consistent with the prior work and shows that increased corporate governance lowers cost of debt. However, when we split the sample companies into intermediated and non-intermediated debt sub-samples, we find this result only holds for the non-intermediated debt sub-sample. Furthermore, we find that small companies that adopt better corporate governance practices do not benefit through lower cost of debt. This raises questions about the merits of universal adoption of costly governance practices. ",
author = "Husam Aldamen and Keith Duncan",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-629X.2011.00439.x",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "49--76",
journal = "Accounting and Finance (ONLINE)",
issn = "0810-5391",
publisher = "Wiley-Academy",
number = "SUPPL.1",

}

Does adopting good corporate governance impact the cost of intermediated and non-intermediated debt? / Aldamen, Husam; Duncan, Keith.

In: Accounting and Finance, Vol. 52, No. SUPPL.1, 10.2012, p. 49-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does adopting good corporate governance impact the cost of intermediated and non-intermediated debt?

AU - Aldamen, Husam

AU - Duncan, Keith

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - This study examines the impact of good corporate governance practices on the reported cost of debt for Australian listed companies. Prior research has established that governance lowers the cost of non-intermediated debt (Sengupta, 1998; Bhojraj and Sengupta, 2003; Ashbaugh-Skaife, 2006). We extend this analysis to the Australian corporate debt market which is dominated by intermediated or privately held debt. Our findings are consistent with the prior work and shows that increased corporate governance lowers cost of debt. However, when we split the sample companies into intermediated and non-intermediated debt sub-samples, we find this result only holds for the non-intermediated debt sub-sample. Furthermore, we find that small companies that adopt better corporate governance practices do not benefit through lower cost of debt. This raises questions about the merits of universal adoption of costly governance practices. 

AB - This study examines the impact of good corporate governance practices on the reported cost of debt for Australian listed companies. Prior research has established that governance lowers the cost of non-intermediated debt (Sengupta, 1998; Bhojraj and Sengupta, 2003; Ashbaugh-Skaife, 2006). We extend this analysis to the Australian corporate debt market which is dominated by intermediated or privately held debt. Our findings are consistent with the prior work and shows that increased corporate governance lowers cost of debt. However, when we split the sample companies into intermediated and non-intermediated debt sub-samples, we find this result only holds for the non-intermediated debt sub-sample. Furthermore, we find that small companies that adopt better corporate governance practices do not benefit through lower cost of debt. This raises questions about the merits of universal adoption of costly governance practices. 

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867229964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-629X.2011.00439.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-629X.2011.00439.x

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 49

EP - 76

JO - Accounting and Finance (ONLINE)

JF - Accounting and Finance (ONLINE)

SN - 0810-5391

IS - SUPPL.1

ER -