Doctrinal reform and post-contractual modifications in New Brunswick: Nav Canada v. Greater Fredricton Airport Authority Inc.

Richard Bigwood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

It frequently happens, especially with enduring contracts, that either or both contracting parties wish to change the contract as they go. Where the contract itself does not provide a procedure for making variations (or, if it does, the parties for whatever reason omit to follow that procedure), the parties can always vary their contract informally. Informal variations, however, can generate some thorny legal issues, especially if the variation privileges one party only (for example, the variation is that the contractor will be paid more simply to finish what the origial contract already requires of him), or if the promisor assented to the variation because the promisee had the promisor 'over a barrel,' so to speak. To be sure, a number of technical legal rules potentially come into play in post-contractual modification situations. Two such rules are the 'pre-existing duty rule,' inside contract law's consideration doctrine, and 'economic duress.'
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)256-277
Number of pages22
JournalCanadian Business Law Journal
Volume49
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

airport
Canada
reform
privilege
doctrine
Law
economics

Cite this

@article{d5a92e63ce824e4e8461dfd5c2a59d4a,
title = "Doctrinal reform and post-contractual modifications in New Brunswick: Nav Canada v. Greater Fredricton Airport Authority Inc.",
abstract = "It frequently happens, especially with enduring contracts, that either or both contracting parties wish to change the contract as they go. Where the contract itself does not provide a procedure for making variations (or, if it does, the parties for whatever reason omit to follow that procedure), the parties can always vary their contract informally. Informal variations, however, can generate some thorny legal issues, especially if the variation privileges one party only (for example, the variation is that the contractor will be paid more simply to finish what the origial contract already requires of him), or if the promisor assented to the variation because the promisee had the promisor 'over a barrel,' so to speak. To be sure, a number of technical legal rules potentially come into play in post-contractual modification situations. Two such rules are the 'pre-existing duty rule,' inside contract law's consideration doctrine, and 'economic duress.'",
author = "Richard Bigwood",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "256--277",
journal = "Canadian Business Law Journal",
issn = "0319-3322",
number = "2",

}

Doctrinal reform and post-contractual modifications in New Brunswick : Nav Canada v. Greater Fredricton Airport Authority Inc. / Bigwood, Richard.

In: Canadian Business Law Journal, Vol. 49, No. 2, 2010, p. 256-277.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Doctrinal reform and post-contractual modifications in New Brunswick

T2 - Nav Canada v. Greater Fredricton Airport Authority Inc.

AU - Bigwood, Richard

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - It frequently happens, especially with enduring contracts, that either or both contracting parties wish to change the contract as they go. Where the contract itself does not provide a procedure for making variations (or, if it does, the parties for whatever reason omit to follow that procedure), the parties can always vary their contract informally. Informal variations, however, can generate some thorny legal issues, especially if the variation privileges one party only (for example, the variation is that the contractor will be paid more simply to finish what the origial contract already requires of him), or if the promisor assented to the variation because the promisee had the promisor 'over a barrel,' so to speak. To be sure, a number of technical legal rules potentially come into play in post-contractual modification situations. Two such rules are the 'pre-existing duty rule,' inside contract law's consideration doctrine, and 'economic duress.'

AB - It frequently happens, especially with enduring contracts, that either or both contracting parties wish to change the contract as they go. Where the contract itself does not provide a procedure for making variations (or, if it does, the parties for whatever reason omit to follow that procedure), the parties can always vary their contract informally. Informal variations, however, can generate some thorny legal issues, especially if the variation privileges one party only (for example, the variation is that the contractor will be paid more simply to finish what the origial contract already requires of him), or if the promisor assented to the variation because the promisee had the promisor 'over a barrel,' so to speak. To be sure, a number of technical legal rules potentially come into play in post-contractual modification situations. Two such rules are the 'pre-existing duty rule,' inside contract law's consideration doctrine, and 'economic duress.'

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 256

EP - 277

JO - Canadian Business Law Journal

JF - Canadian Business Law Journal

SN - 0319-3322

IS - 2

ER -