Doctors as patients: A systematic review of doctors' health access and the barriers they experience

Margaret Kay, Geoffrey Mitchell, Alexandra Clavarino, Jenny Doust

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

77 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The need to improve doctors' access to health care by reducing the barriers they experience has been regularly described in the literature, yet the barriers experienced are not well defined, despite the volume of expert opinion in this area.

AIM: To define what is known about doctors' access to health care from the data within the current literature.

DESIGN OF STUDY: A systematic review of studies of doctors' health access.

METHOD: A systematic search of MEDLINE and CINAHL, supplemented by citation searches and searches of the grey literature, identified both quantitative and qualitative studies. Two reviewers used specific criteria for inclusion of studies and quality assessment. The data were tabulated and analysed.

RESULTS: Twenty-six articles met the inclusion criteria. The paucity of data and the overall poor quality of those data are highlighted. Despite this, many doctors appear to have a GP, but this does not ensure adequate health access. Systemic barriers to healthcare access (long hours and cultural issues) are more significant than individual barriers.

CONCLUSION: Expert opinion in this field is supported by poor-quality data. The current knowledge reveals important similarities between doctors and the general population in their healthcare access, especially with mental health issues. Understanding this may help the medical profession to respond to these issues of 'doctors' health' more effectively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)501-508
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Journal of General Practice
Volume58
Issue number552
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health Services Accessibility
Expert Testimony
Health
Delivery of Health Care
Literature
MEDLINE
Mental Health
Population
Data Accuracy

Cite this

Kay, Margaret ; Mitchell, Geoffrey ; Clavarino, Alexandra ; Doust, Jenny. / Doctors as patients : A systematic review of doctors' health access and the barriers they experience. In: British Journal of General Practice. 2008 ; Vol. 58, No. 552. pp. 501-508.
@article{4e870ce7d68b4a828a96cc007e820d5d,
title = "Doctors as patients: A systematic review of doctors' health access and the barriers they experience",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The need to improve doctors' access to health care by reducing the barriers they experience has been regularly described in the literature, yet the barriers experienced are not well defined, despite the volume of expert opinion in this area.AIM: To define what is known about doctors' access to health care from the data within the current literature.DESIGN OF STUDY: A systematic review of studies of doctors' health access.METHOD: A systematic search of MEDLINE and CINAHL, supplemented by citation searches and searches of the grey literature, identified both quantitative and qualitative studies. Two reviewers used specific criteria for inclusion of studies and quality assessment. The data were tabulated and analysed.RESULTS: Twenty-six articles met the inclusion criteria. The paucity of data and the overall poor quality of those data are highlighted. Despite this, many doctors appear to have a GP, but this does not ensure adequate health access. Systemic barriers to healthcare access (long hours and cultural issues) are more significant than individual barriers.CONCLUSION: Expert opinion in this field is supported by poor-quality data. The current knowledge reveals important similarities between doctors and the general population in their healthcare access, especially with mental health issues. Understanding this may help the medical profession to respond to these issues of 'doctors' health' more effectively.",
author = "Margaret Kay and Geoffrey Mitchell and Alexandra Clavarino and Jenny Doust",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
doi = "10.3399/bjgp08X319486",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "501--508",
journal = "Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners",
issn = "0960-1643",
publisher = "ROYAL COLL GENERAL PRACTITIONERS",
number = "552",

}

Doctors as patients : A systematic review of doctors' health access and the barriers they experience. / Kay, Margaret; Mitchell, Geoffrey; Clavarino, Alexandra; Doust, Jenny.

In: British Journal of General Practice, Vol. 58, No. 552, 07.2008, p. 501-508.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Doctors as patients

T2 - A systematic review of doctors' health access and the barriers they experience

AU - Kay, Margaret

AU - Mitchell, Geoffrey

AU - Clavarino, Alexandra

AU - Doust, Jenny

PY - 2008/7

Y1 - 2008/7

N2 - BACKGROUND: The need to improve doctors' access to health care by reducing the barriers they experience has been regularly described in the literature, yet the barriers experienced are not well defined, despite the volume of expert opinion in this area.AIM: To define what is known about doctors' access to health care from the data within the current literature.DESIGN OF STUDY: A systematic review of studies of doctors' health access.METHOD: A systematic search of MEDLINE and CINAHL, supplemented by citation searches and searches of the grey literature, identified both quantitative and qualitative studies. Two reviewers used specific criteria for inclusion of studies and quality assessment. The data were tabulated and analysed.RESULTS: Twenty-six articles met the inclusion criteria. The paucity of data and the overall poor quality of those data are highlighted. Despite this, many doctors appear to have a GP, but this does not ensure adequate health access. Systemic barriers to healthcare access (long hours and cultural issues) are more significant than individual barriers.CONCLUSION: Expert opinion in this field is supported by poor-quality data. The current knowledge reveals important similarities between doctors and the general population in their healthcare access, especially with mental health issues. Understanding this may help the medical profession to respond to these issues of 'doctors' health' more effectively.

AB - BACKGROUND: The need to improve doctors' access to health care by reducing the barriers they experience has been regularly described in the literature, yet the barriers experienced are not well defined, despite the volume of expert opinion in this area.AIM: To define what is known about doctors' access to health care from the data within the current literature.DESIGN OF STUDY: A systematic review of studies of doctors' health access.METHOD: A systematic search of MEDLINE and CINAHL, supplemented by citation searches and searches of the grey literature, identified both quantitative and qualitative studies. Two reviewers used specific criteria for inclusion of studies and quality assessment. The data were tabulated and analysed.RESULTS: Twenty-six articles met the inclusion criteria. The paucity of data and the overall poor quality of those data are highlighted. Despite this, many doctors appear to have a GP, but this does not ensure adequate health access. Systemic barriers to healthcare access (long hours and cultural issues) are more significant than individual barriers.CONCLUSION: Expert opinion in this field is supported by poor-quality data. The current knowledge reveals important similarities between doctors and the general population in their healthcare access, especially with mental health issues. Understanding this may help the medical profession to respond to these issues of 'doctors' health' more effectively.

U2 - 10.3399/bjgp08X319486

DO - 10.3399/bjgp08X319486

M3 - Review article

VL - 58

SP - 501

EP - 508

JO - Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners

JF - Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners

SN - 0960-1643

IS - 552

ER -