Do socially responsible fund managers really invest differently?

Karen L. Benson, Timothy J. Brailsford, Jacquelyn E. Humphrey

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To date, research into socially responsible investment (SRI), and in particular the socially responsible investment funds industry, has focused on whether investing in SRI assets has any differential impact on investor returns. Prior findings generally suggest that, on a risk-adjusted basis, there is no difference in performance between SRI and conventional funds. This result has led to questions about whether SRI funds are really any different from conventional funds. This paper examines whether the portfolio allocation across industry sectors and the stock-picking ability of SRI managers are different when compared to conventional fund managers. The study finds that SRI funds exhibit different industry betas consistent with different portfolio positions, but that these differences vary from year to year. It is also found that there is little difference in stock-picking ability between the two groups of fund managers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-357
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume65
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fund managers
Socially responsible investment
Managers
Investment funds
Industry
Conventional
Investing
Investors
Assets
Portfolio allocation

Cite this

Benson, Karen L. ; Brailsford, Timothy J. ; Humphrey, Jacquelyn E. / Do socially responsible fund managers really invest differently?. In: Journal of Business Ethics. 2006 ; Vol. 65, No. 4. pp. 337-357.
@article{fdce5923738e4cddb3205a86a4ff4b1b,
title = "Do socially responsible fund managers really invest differently?",
abstract = "To date, research into socially responsible investment (SRI), and in particular the socially responsible investment funds industry, has focused on whether investing in SRI assets has any differential impact on investor returns. Prior findings generally suggest that, on a risk-adjusted basis, there is no difference in performance between SRI and conventional funds. This result has led to questions about whether SRI funds are really any different from conventional funds. This paper examines whether the portfolio allocation across industry sectors and the stock-picking ability of SRI managers are different when compared to conventional fund managers. The study finds that SRI funds exhibit different industry betas consistent with different portfolio positions, but that these differences vary from year to year. It is also found that there is little difference in stock-picking ability between the two groups of fund managers.",
author = "Benson, {Karen L.} and Brailsford, {Timothy J.} and Humphrey, {Jacquelyn E.}",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s10551-006-0003-8",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "337--357",
journal = "Journal of Business Ethics",
issn = "0167-4544",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

Do socially responsible fund managers really invest differently? / Benson, Karen L.; Brailsford, Timothy J.; Humphrey, Jacquelyn E.

In: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 65, No. 4, 06.2006, p. 337-357.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do socially responsible fund managers really invest differently?

AU - Benson, Karen L.

AU - Brailsford, Timothy J.

AU - Humphrey, Jacquelyn E.

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - To date, research into socially responsible investment (SRI), and in particular the socially responsible investment funds industry, has focused on whether investing in SRI assets has any differential impact on investor returns. Prior findings generally suggest that, on a risk-adjusted basis, there is no difference in performance between SRI and conventional funds. This result has led to questions about whether SRI funds are really any different from conventional funds. This paper examines whether the portfolio allocation across industry sectors and the stock-picking ability of SRI managers are different when compared to conventional fund managers. The study finds that SRI funds exhibit different industry betas consistent with different portfolio positions, but that these differences vary from year to year. It is also found that there is little difference in stock-picking ability between the two groups of fund managers.

AB - To date, research into socially responsible investment (SRI), and in particular the socially responsible investment funds industry, has focused on whether investing in SRI assets has any differential impact on investor returns. Prior findings generally suggest that, on a risk-adjusted basis, there is no difference in performance between SRI and conventional funds. This result has led to questions about whether SRI funds are really any different from conventional funds. This paper examines whether the portfolio allocation across industry sectors and the stock-picking ability of SRI managers are different when compared to conventional fund managers. The study finds that SRI funds exhibit different industry betas consistent with different portfolio positions, but that these differences vary from year to year. It is also found that there is little difference in stock-picking ability between the two groups of fund managers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745658062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10551-006-0003-8

DO - 10.1007/s10551-006-0003-8

M3 - Review article

VL - 65

SP - 337

EP - 357

JO - Journal of Business Ethics

JF - Journal of Business Ethics

SN - 0167-4544

IS - 4

ER -