Do people with aphasia want written stroke and aphasia information? A verbal survey exploring preferences for when and how to provide stroke and aphasia information

Tanya Rose, Linda Worrall, Louise Hickson, Tammy Hoffmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: Written health information can be better comprehended by people with aphasia if it is provided in an aphasia-friendly format. However, before pursuing research in the area of text-formatting for people with aphasia, it must be determined whether people with aphasia consider it helpful to receive health information in the written media. This study, therefore, aimed to determine the following: whether people with aphasia consider it important to receive written stroke and aphasia information; when people with aphasia prefer to receive this information; and what their preferences are for health information media.

METHOD: Surveys were administered in a face-to-face interview with 40 adults with aphasia. Participants were purposefully selected using maximum variation sampling for a variety of variables including aphasia severity, reading ability, and time post stroke.

RESULTS: Participants thought it important to receive written information about both stroke and aphasia. They considered it helpful to receive written information at several stages post stroke, particularly from 1 month onwards. The largest proportion (97%) of participants identified 6 months post stroke as the most helpful time to receive this information. Written information was the most preferred media at participants' present time post stroke (M = 39 months; range, 2-178 months). Videos/DVDs were the most preferred media during the 6 months immediately following the stroke.

CONCLUSION: Despite reading and language difficulties, participants considered written information to be important, hence people with aphasia should receive written information about both stroke and aphasia. This information should be easily accessible throughout the continuum of care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-98
Number of pages20
JournalTopics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jun 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Aphasia
Stroke
Surveys and Questionnaires
Reading
Health
Aptitude
Continuity of Patient Care
Language
Interviews

Cite this

@article{fba39185dda64706a2f45facaafe651f,
title = "Do people with aphasia want written stroke and aphasia information? A verbal survey exploring preferences for when and how to provide stroke and aphasia information",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Written health information can be better comprehended by people with aphasia if it is provided in an aphasia-friendly format. However, before pursuing research in the area of text-formatting for people with aphasia, it must be determined whether people with aphasia consider it helpful to receive health information in the written media. This study, therefore, aimed to determine the following: whether people with aphasia consider it important to receive written stroke and aphasia information; when people with aphasia prefer to receive this information; and what their preferences are for health information media.METHOD: Surveys were administered in a face-to-face interview with 40 adults with aphasia. Participants were purposefully selected using maximum variation sampling for a variety of variables including aphasia severity, reading ability, and time post stroke.RESULTS: Participants thought it important to receive written information about both stroke and aphasia. They considered it helpful to receive written information at several stages post stroke, particularly from 1 month onwards. The largest proportion (97{\%}) of participants identified 6 months post stroke as the most helpful time to receive this information. Written information was the most preferred media at participants' present time post stroke (M = 39 months; range, 2-178 months). Videos/DVDs were the most preferred media during the 6 months immediately following the stroke.CONCLUSION: Despite reading and language difficulties, participants considered written information to be important, hence people with aphasia should receive written information about both stroke and aphasia. This information should be easily accessible throughout the continuum of care.",
author = "Tanya Rose and Linda Worrall and Louise Hickson and Tammy Hoffmann",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1310/tsr1702-79",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "79--98",
journal = "Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation",
issn = "1074-9357",
publisher = "Thomas Land Publishers Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Do people with aphasia want written stroke and aphasia information? A verbal survey exploring preferences for when and how to provide stroke and aphasia information. / Rose, Tanya; Worrall, Linda; Hickson, Louise; Hoffmann, Tammy.

In: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, Vol. 17, No. 2, 15.06.2010, p. 79-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do people with aphasia want written stroke and aphasia information? A verbal survey exploring preferences for when and how to provide stroke and aphasia information

AU - Rose, Tanya

AU - Worrall, Linda

AU - Hickson, Louise

AU - Hoffmann, Tammy

PY - 2010/6/15

Y1 - 2010/6/15

N2 - PURPOSE: Written health information can be better comprehended by people with aphasia if it is provided in an aphasia-friendly format. However, before pursuing research in the area of text-formatting for people with aphasia, it must be determined whether people with aphasia consider it helpful to receive health information in the written media. This study, therefore, aimed to determine the following: whether people with aphasia consider it important to receive written stroke and aphasia information; when people with aphasia prefer to receive this information; and what their preferences are for health information media.METHOD: Surveys were administered in a face-to-face interview with 40 adults with aphasia. Participants were purposefully selected using maximum variation sampling for a variety of variables including aphasia severity, reading ability, and time post stroke.RESULTS: Participants thought it important to receive written information about both stroke and aphasia. They considered it helpful to receive written information at several stages post stroke, particularly from 1 month onwards. The largest proportion (97%) of participants identified 6 months post stroke as the most helpful time to receive this information. Written information was the most preferred media at participants' present time post stroke (M = 39 months; range, 2-178 months). Videos/DVDs were the most preferred media during the 6 months immediately following the stroke.CONCLUSION: Despite reading and language difficulties, participants considered written information to be important, hence people with aphasia should receive written information about both stroke and aphasia. This information should be easily accessible throughout the continuum of care.

AB - PURPOSE: Written health information can be better comprehended by people with aphasia if it is provided in an aphasia-friendly format. However, before pursuing research in the area of text-formatting for people with aphasia, it must be determined whether people with aphasia consider it helpful to receive health information in the written media. This study, therefore, aimed to determine the following: whether people with aphasia consider it important to receive written stroke and aphasia information; when people with aphasia prefer to receive this information; and what their preferences are for health information media.METHOD: Surveys were administered in a face-to-face interview with 40 adults with aphasia. Participants were purposefully selected using maximum variation sampling for a variety of variables including aphasia severity, reading ability, and time post stroke.RESULTS: Participants thought it important to receive written information about both stroke and aphasia. They considered it helpful to receive written information at several stages post stroke, particularly from 1 month onwards. The largest proportion (97%) of participants identified 6 months post stroke as the most helpful time to receive this information. Written information was the most preferred media at participants' present time post stroke (M = 39 months; range, 2-178 months). Videos/DVDs were the most preferred media during the 6 months immediately following the stroke.CONCLUSION: Despite reading and language difficulties, participants considered written information to be important, hence people with aphasia should receive written information about both stroke and aphasia. This information should be easily accessible throughout the continuum of care.

U2 - 10.1310/tsr1702-79

DO - 10.1310/tsr1702-79

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 79

EP - 98

JO - Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

JF - Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

SN - 1074-9357

IS - 2

ER -