Distribution, redistribution or maintaining the status quo? The normative foundation of intimate partner constructive trusts

Research output: Contribution to conferencePresentationResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Judgments concerning intimate partner constructive trusts often claim not to effect a redistribution of property as between the legal and beneficial owners. Yet despite looking at the parties’ respective contributions and the context of their relationship, the courts’ findings embody assumptions about justice and the value of labor within marriage-like relationships. Therefore in finding a constructive trust and determining the date at which it arose, it is at least arguable that the courts are themselves allocating property interests. This paper examines key Australian decisions on intimate partner constructive trusts to identify and critique possible justificatory norms on which contemporary doctrine in this area is founded.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013
Externally publishedYes
EventObligations Group Trusts Conference - Melbourne, Australia
Duration: 5 Dec 20136 Dec 2013

Conference

ConferenceObligations Group Trusts Conference
CountryAustralia
CityMelbourne
Period5/12/136/12/13

Fingerprint

redistribution
doctrine
marriage
justice
labor
Values

Cite this

@conference{d3805022c1b34c63a3494dbde25d6f75,
title = "Distribution, redistribution or maintaining the status quo? The normative foundation of intimate partner constructive trusts",
abstract = "Judgments concerning intimate partner constructive trusts often claim not to effect a redistribution of property as between the legal and beneficial owners. Yet despite looking at the parties’ respective contributions and the context of their relationship, the courts’ findings embody assumptions about justice and the value of labor within marriage-like relationships. Therefore in finding a constructive trust and determining the date at which it arose, it is at least arguable that the courts are themselves allocating property interests. This paper examines key Australian decisions on intimate partner constructive trusts to identify and critique possible justificatory norms on which contemporary doctrine in this area is founded.",
author = "Kathrine Galloway",
note = "Conference Presentation; Obligations Group Trusts Conference ; Conference date: 05-12-2013 Through 06-12-2013",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
language = "English",

}

Distribution, redistribution or maintaining the status quo? The normative foundation of intimate partner constructive trusts. / Galloway, Kathrine.

2013. Obligations Group Trusts Conference, Melbourne, Australia.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePresentationResearchpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - Distribution, redistribution or maintaining the status quo? The normative foundation of intimate partner constructive trusts

AU - Galloway, Kathrine

N1 - Conference Presentation

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - Judgments concerning intimate partner constructive trusts often claim not to effect a redistribution of property as between the legal and beneficial owners. Yet despite looking at the parties’ respective contributions and the context of their relationship, the courts’ findings embody assumptions about justice and the value of labor within marriage-like relationships. Therefore in finding a constructive trust and determining the date at which it arose, it is at least arguable that the courts are themselves allocating property interests. This paper examines key Australian decisions on intimate partner constructive trusts to identify and critique possible justificatory norms on which contemporary doctrine in this area is founded.

AB - Judgments concerning intimate partner constructive trusts often claim not to effect a redistribution of property as between the legal and beneficial owners. Yet despite looking at the parties’ respective contributions and the context of their relationship, the courts’ findings embody assumptions about justice and the value of labor within marriage-like relationships. Therefore in finding a constructive trust and determining the date at which it arose, it is at least arguable that the courts are themselves allocating property interests. This paper examines key Australian decisions on intimate partner constructive trusts to identify and critique possible justificatory norms on which contemporary doctrine in this area is founded.

M3 - Presentation

ER -