Abstract
Background:
Arthritis of the distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) can result in significant functional limitations and pain. While arthrodesis is the most common surgical intervention, this can decrease grip strength and have other limitations. DIPJ arthroplasty may be an appealing alternative in select patient with this study aiming to review the outcomes of this procedure.
Methods:
A search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Embase and Ovid Medline from date of inception to April 2022. Relevant studies were included if they reported on complications and functional outcomes of DIPJ arthroplasty. Data was then extracted and analysed.
Results:
Seven studies were included including 171 patients with 269 digits. The mean age was 62.1 years, with 81% of the cohort being female. The indication for surgery was osteoarthritis in 97% of patients. Surgical approaches varied from dorsal transverse, dorsal T-incision, dorsal H-incision to radial incisions. A silicone implant was used in all patients. A total of 97.7% of patients were satisfied with their outcome, and pain improved or eliminated in all patients where it was reported. Joint stability was noted in 97.4% of cases. The mean preoperative DIPJ range of motion was 24° and improved to 36° post-operation. The mean preoperative extensor lag was 24° and reduced to 13° post operation. The rate of re-operation was 7.1%.
Conclusions:
DIPJ arthroplasty may be a viable alternative to arthrodesis in certain settings, providing high patient satisfaction, improvements in digital range of motion and relief of pain. However, the available literature is sparse, and limited by low-quality studies and heterogenous outcome reporting.
Arthritis of the distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) can result in significant functional limitations and pain. While arthrodesis is the most common surgical intervention, this can decrease grip strength and have other limitations. DIPJ arthroplasty may be an appealing alternative in select patient with this study aiming to review the outcomes of this procedure.
Methods:
A search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Embase and Ovid Medline from date of inception to April 2022. Relevant studies were included if they reported on complications and functional outcomes of DIPJ arthroplasty. Data was then extracted and analysed.
Results:
Seven studies were included including 171 patients with 269 digits. The mean age was 62.1 years, with 81% of the cohort being female. The indication for surgery was osteoarthritis in 97% of patients. Surgical approaches varied from dorsal transverse, dorsal T-incision, dorsal H-incision to radial incisions. A silicone implant was used in all patients. A total of 97.7% of patients were satisfied with their outcome, and pain improved or eliminated in all patients where it was reported. Joint stability was noted in 97.4% of cases. The mean preoperative DIPJ range of motion was 24° and improved to 36° post-operation. The mean preoperative extensor lag was 24° and reduced to 13° post operation. The rate of re-operation was 7.1%.
Conclusions:
DIPJ arthroplasty may be a viable alternative to arthrodesis in certain settings, providing high patient satisfaction, improvements in digital range of motion and relief of pain. However, the available literature is sparse, and limited by low-quality studies and heterogenous outcome reporting.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 409-414 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Hand Surgery Asian-Pacific Volume |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2023 |
| Externally published | Yes |