Digital Imaging Is Not Superior to Film-Screen Imaging for the Detection of Periprosthetic Osteolysis Around Total Knee Arthroplasties

Mario G.T. Zotti*, David G. Campbell, Richard Woodman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Our aim was to compare the assessment of periprosthetic osteolysis around total knee arthroplasties using digital images against film-screen images. Simulated osteolytic lesions were created around 3 cadaveric total knee arthroplasties images acquired using fluoroscopic-assisted radiography and Computed Tomography. Three surgeons reviewed the film-screen images (AP/Lateral, Oblique, and Computed Tomography (CAT)) and the same images digitally. Combinations of 2 or more images that included the AP/Lateral views had superior performance in both film-screen and digital imaging to AP/Lateral views alone, except for the digital AP/Lateral/OBL combination. Lesion detection and volume appreciation were superior for film versus digital assessment for most angles. The addition of obliques to assessment using digital imaging improved performance, but film-screen remained superior to digital imaging for assessment of periprosthetic osteolysis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)736-741
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

Cite this