Digesting discourse: How animal law facilitates high quality legal education

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Animal law teachers typically assert that an animal law classroom provides the ideal training ground for a law student. The purpose of this paper is to critically examine this assertion and, ultimately, to provide a supporting argument for the proposition that animal law is a unique vehicle for providing students with a high quality legal education. Legal education is characterised by distinct and competing discourses with respect to the nature of law teaching, including doctrinalism, vocationalism, corporatism, liberalism, radicalism and educationalism. The first part of the paper provides an overview of Foucauldian discourse theory and a description of each legal education discourse. The second part of the paper provides an examination of the distinctive features of an animal law curriculum and learning environment that make the subject an ideal setting for facilitating high quality student learning, regardless of the predominant discourse in operation.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages14
JournalLegal Education Review
Volume27
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

animal
Law
discourse
education
law of nature
discourse theory
corporatism
student
radicalism
liberalism
learning environment
curriculum
classroom
examination
Teaching
teacher
learning

Cite this

@article{40d32cab827444f194a967edf18a181f,
title = "Digesting discourse: How animal law facilitates high quality legal education",
abstract = "Animal law teachers typically assert that an animal law classroom provides the ideal training ground for a law student. The purpose of this paper is to critically examine this assertion and, ultimately, to provide a supporting argument for the proposition that animal law is a unique vehicle for providing students with a high quality legal education. Legal education is characterised by distinct and competing discourses with respect to the nature of law teaching, including doctrinalism, vocationalism, corporatism, liberalism, radicalism and educationalism. The first part of the paper provides an overview of Foucauldian discourse theory and a description of each legal education discourse. The second part of the paper provides an examination of the distinctive features of an animal law curriculum and learning environment that make the subject an ideal setting for facilitating high quality student learning, regardless of the predominant discourse in operation.",
author = "Jackson Walkden-Brown",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
journal = "Legal Education Review",
issn = "1033-2839",
number = "1",

}

Digesting discourse : How animal law facilitates high quality legal education. / Walkden-Brown, Jackson.

In: Legal Education Review, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Digesting discourse

T2 - How animal law facilitates high quality legal education

AU - Walkden-Brown, Jackson

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Animal law teachers typically assert that an animal law classroom provides the ideal training ground for a law student. The purpose of this paper is to critically examine this assertion and, ultimately, to provide a supporting argument for the proposition that animal law is a unique vehicle for providing students with a high quality legal education. Legal education is characterised by distinct and competing discourses with respect to the nature of law teaching, including doctrinalism, vocationalism, corporatism, liberalism, radicalism and educationalism. The first part of the paper provides an overview of Foucauldian discourse theory and a description of each legal education discourse. The second part of the paper provides an examination of the distinctive features of an animal law curriculum and learning environment that make the subject an ideal setting for facilitating high quality student learning, regardless of the predominant discourse in operation.

AB - Animal law teachers typically assert that an animal law classroom provides the ideal training ground for a law student. The purpose of this paper is to critically examine this assertion and, ultimately, to provide a supporting argument for the proposition that animal law is a unique vehicle for providing students with a high quality legal education. Legal education is characterised by distinct and competing discourses with respect to the nature of law teaching, including doctrinalism, vocationalism, corporatism, liberalism, radicalism and educationalism. The first part of the paper provides an overview of Foucauldian discourse theory and a description of each legal education discourse. The second part of the paper provides an examination of the distinctive features of an animal law curriculum and learning environment that make the subject an ideal setting for facilitating high quality student learning, regardless of the predominant discourse in operation.

M3 - Article

VL - 27

JO - Legal Education Review

JF - Legal Education Review

SN - 1033-2839

IS - 1

ER -