Dietitians' practices and perspectives on nutrition priorities for liver transplant recipients

Eryn M Murray, Simone M. McCoy, Katrina L. Campbell, Ingrid J. Hickman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim To describe current practice and priorities of dietitians during the acute (≤3 months) and long-term (≥6 months) management of liver transplant recipients. Methods Ten liver transplant dietitians (10/14, 71%) in Australia, New Zealand, UK and USA responded to an online survey. The survey graded nutrition priorities on a Likert scale, recorded barriers to service delivery and workforce allocation for nutrition services (ratio of full-time equivalent: annual transplant rate). Results Just over half (n = 6, 60%) reported routine dietary assessment post-liver transplant. The majority (90%, n = 9) also provide initial dietary education in the acute setting. Thirty percent (n = 3) routinely provide ongoing acute follow up; however, no sites provide routine follow up after 6 months. Dietitian-to-transplant patient ratios demonstrated a broad range of resource allocation across sites 1:244 (1:39-1:1410). 70% (n = 7) reported lack of funding as a major barrier. Protein and energy requirements (n = 10, 100%) were identified as the main clinical focus in the acute period. Prevention of post-transplant weight gain and diabetes were identified as priority areas during the acute period by 60% of respondents (n = 6) and long-term management by all respondents (n = 10, 100%). Conclusion This international survey identified inconsistent resourcing of nutrition services post-liver transplantation, with lack of funding the main barrier to providing long-term care. While the majority of liver transplant dietitians prioritise prevention of excessive weight gain, long-term follow up is limited. Further research is needed to investigate the optimal management of liver transplant recipients.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)86-91
Number of pages6
JournalNutrition and Dietetics
Volume71
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nutritionists
Transplants
Liver
Weight Gain
Resource Allocation
Nutrition Surveys
Long-Term Care
New Zealand
Liver Transplantation
Transplant Recipients
Education
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research
Proteins

Cite this

Murray, Eryn M ; McCoy, Simone M. ; Campbell, Katrina L. ; Hickman, Ingrid J. / Dietitians' practices and perspectives on nutrition priorities for liver transplant recipients. In: Nutrition and Dietetics. 2014 ; Vol. 71, No. 2. pp. 86-91.
@article{5f24110836bb447d936d2181eb4a7b96,
title = "Dietitians' practices and perspectives on nutrition priorities for liver transplant recipients",
abstract = "Aim To describe current practice and priorities of dietitians during the acute (≤3 months) and long-term (≥6 months) management of liver transplant recipients. Methods Ten liver transplant dietitians (10/14, 71{\%}) in Australia, New Zealand, UK and USA responded to an online survey. The survey graded nutrition priorities on a Likert scale, recorded barriers to service delivery and workforce allocation for nutrition services (ratio of full-time equivalent: annual transplant rate). Results Just over half (n = 6, 60{\%}) reported routine dietary assessment post-liver transplant. The majority (90{\%}, n = 9) also provide initial dietary education in the acute setting. Thirty percent (n = 3) routinely provide ongoing acute follow up; however, no sites provide routine follow up after 6 months. Dietitian-to-transplant patient ratios demonstrated a broad range of resource allocation across sites 1:244 (1:39-1:1410). 70{\%} (n = 7) reported lack of funding as a major barrier. Protein and energy requirements (n = 10, 100{\%}) were identified as the main clinical focus in the acute period. Prevention of post-transplant weight gain and diabetes were identified as priority areas during the acute period by 60{\%} of respondents (n = 6) and long-term management by all respondents (n = 10, 100{\%}). Conclusion This international survey identified inconsistent resourcing of nutrition services post-liver transplantation, with lack of funding the main barrier to providing long-term care. While the majority of liver transplant dietitians prioritise prevention of excessive weight gain, long-term follow up is limited. Further research is needed to investigate the optimal management of liver transplant recipients.",
author = "Murray, {Eryn M} and McCoy, {Simone M.} and Campbell, {Katrina L.} and Hickman, {Ingrid J.}",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1747-0080.12079",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "86--91",
journal = "Nutrition and Dietetics",
issn = "1032-1322",
publisher = "Wiley-Academy",
number = "2",

}

Dietitians' practices and perspectives on nutrition priorities for liver transplant recipients. / Murray, Eryn M; McCoy, Simone M.; Campbell, Katrina L.; Hickman, Ingrid J.

In: Nutrition and Dietetics, Vol. 71, No. 2, 01.06.2014, p. 86-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dietitians' practices and perspectives on nutrition priorities for liver transplant recipients

AU - Murray, Eryn M

AU - McCoy, Simone M.

AU - Campbell, Katrina L.

AU - Hickman, Ingrid J.

PY - 2014/6/1

Y1 - 2014/6/1

N2 - Aim To describe current practice and priorities of dietitians during the acute (≤3 months) and long-term (≥6 months) management of liver transplant recipients. Methods Ten liver transplant dietitians (10/14, 71%) in Australia, New Zealand, UK and USA responded to an online survey. The survey graded nutrition priorities on a Likert scale, recorded barriers to service delivery and workforce allocation for nutrition services (ratio of full-time equivalent: annual transplant rate). Results Just over half (n = 6, 60%) reported routine dietary assessment post-liver transplant. The majority (90%, n = 9) also provide initial dietary education in the acute setting. Thirty percent (n = 3) routinely provide ongoing acute follow up; however, no sites provide routine follow up after 6 months. Dietitian-to-transplant patient ratios demonstrated a broad range of resource allocation across sites 1:244 (1:39-1:1410). 70% (n = 7) reported lack of funding as a major barrier. Protein and energy requirements (n = 10, 100%) were identified as the main clinical focus in the acute period. Prevention of post-transplant weight gain and diabetes were identified as priority areas during the acute period by 60% of respondents (n = 6) and long-term management by all respondents (n = 10, 100%). Conclusion This international survey identified inconsistent resourcing of nutrition services post-liver transplantation, with lack of funding the main barrier to providing long-term care. While the majority of liver transplant dietitians prioritise prevention of excessive weight gain, long-term follow up is limited. Further research is needed to investigate the optimal management of liver transplant recipients.

AB - Aim To describe current practice and priorities of dietitians during the acute (≤3 months) and long-term (≥6 months) management of liver transplant recipients. Methods Ten liver transplant dietitians (10/14, 71%) in Australia, New Zealand, UK and USA responded to an online survey. The survey graded nutrition priorities on a Likert scale, recorded barriers to service delivery and workforce allocation for nutrition services (ratio of full-time equivalent: annual transplant rate). Results Just over half (n = 6, 60%) reported routine dietary assessment post-liver transplant. The majority (90%, n = 9) also provide initial dietary education in the acute setting. Thirty percent (n = 3) routinely provide ongoing acute follow up; however, no sites provide routine follow up after 6 months. Dietitian-to-transplant patient ratios demonstrated a broad range of resource allocation across sites 1:244 (1:39-1:1410). 70% (n = 7) reported lack of funding as a major barrier. Protein and energy requirements (n = 10, 100%) were identified as the main clinical focus in the acute period. Prevention of post-transplant weight gain and diabetes were identified as priority areas during the acute period by 60% of respondents (n = 6) and long-term management by all respondents (n = 10, 100%). Conclusion This international survey identified inconsistent resourcing of nutrition services post-liver transplantation, with lack of funding the main barrier to providing long-term care. While the majority of liver transplant dietitians prioritise prevention of excessive weight gain, long-term follow up is limited. Further research is needed to investigate the optimal management of liver transplant recipients.

U2 - 10.1111/1747-0080.12079

DO - 10.1111/1747-0080.12079

M3 - Article

VL - 71

SP - 86

EP - 91

JO - Nutrition and Dietetics

JF - Nutrition and Dietetics

SN - 1032-1322

IS - 2

ER -