Diagnosing asthma in adults in primary care: A qualitative study of Australian GPs' experiences

Sarah M. Dennis, Nicholas A. Zwar, Guy B. Marks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To explore what difficulties are faced by general practitioners (GPs) when trying to make a diagnosis of asthma in adults, and whether there are patient characteristics that influence this process. Methods: A qualitative study in which three focus group discussions were conducted with 18 GPs. Results: GPs were confident with the components needed to confirm a diagnosis of asthma but not with the use of spirometry. GPs said that time was an important factor - time to undertake the tests in their practice, and time to persuade the patient to engage in the diagnostic process including follow-up visits. Patients who were less willing to engage in this process were likely to be treated symptomatically. Conclusion: Continuity of care is important. A diagnosis of asthma seems to be more likely in patients with an ongoing relationship with their GP where both are willing to engage in the diagnostic process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)52-56
Number of pages5
JournalPrimary Care Respiratory Journal
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

General Practitioners
Primary Health Care
Asthma
Continuity of Patient Care
Spirometry
Focus Groups

Cite this

@article{d48465b895214893aa02a44ff397c8d4,
title = "Diagnosing asthma in adults in primary care: A qualitative study of Australian GPs' experiences",
abstract = "Aim: To explore what difficulties are faced by general practitioners (GPs) when trying to make a diagnosis of asthma in adults, and whether there are patient characteristics that influence this process. Methods: A qualitative study in which three focus group discussions were conducted with 18 GPs. Results: GPs were confident with the components needed to confirm a diagnosis of asthma but not with the use of spirometry. GPs said that time was an important factor - time to undertake the tests in their practice, and time to persuade the patient to engage in the diagnostic process including follow-up visits. Patients who were less willing to engage in this process were likely to be treated symptomatically. Conclusion: Continuity of care is important. A diagnosis of asthma seems to be more likely in patients with an ongoing relationship with their GP where both are willing to engage in the diagnostic process.",
author = "Dennis, {Sarah M.} and Zwar, {Nicholas A.} and Marks, {Guy B.}",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4104/pcrj.2009.00046",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "52--56",
journal = "Primary Care Respiratory Journal",
issn = "1475-1534",
publisher = "Primary Care Respiratory Society UK",
number = "1",

}

Diagnosing asthma in adults in primary care : A qualitative study of Australian GPs' experiences. / Dennis, Sarah M.; Zwar, Nicholas A.; Marks, Guy B.

In: Primary Care Respiratory Journal, Vol. 19, No. 1, 01.03.2010, p. 52-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnosing asthma in adults in primary care

T2 - A qualitative study of Australian GPs' experiences

AU - Dennis, Sarah M.

AU - Zwar, Nicholas A.

AU - Marks, Guy B.

PY - 2010/3/1

Y1 - 2010/3/1

N2 - Aim: To explore what difficulties are faced by general practitioners (GPs) when trying to make a diagnosis of asthma in adults, and whether there are patient characteristics that influence this process. Methods: A qualitative study in which three focus group discussions were conducted with 18 GPs. Results: GPs were confident with the components needed to confirm a diagnosis of asthma but not with the use of spirometry. GPs said that time was an important factor - time to undertake the tests in their practice, and time to persuade the patient to engage in the diagnostic process including follow-up visits. Patients who were less willing to engage in this process were likely to be treated symptomatically. Conclusion: Continuity of care is important. A diagnosis of asthma seems to be more likely in patients with an ongoing relationship with their GP where both are willing to engage in the diagnostic process.

AB - Aim: To explore what difficulties are faced by general practitioners (GPs) when trying to make a diagnosis of asthma in adults, and whether there are patient characteristics that influence this process. Methods: A qualitative study in which three focus group discussions were conducted with 18 GPs. Results: GPs were confident with the components needed to confirm a diagnosis of asthma but not with the use of spirometry. GPs said that time was an important factor - time to undertake the tests in their practice, and time to persuade the patient to engage in the diagnostic process including follow-up visits. Patients who were less willing to engage in this process were likely to be treated symptomatically. Conclusion: Continuity of care is important. A diagnosis of asthma seems to be more likely in patients with an ongoing relationship with their GP where both are willing to engage in the diagnostic process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77749233902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4104/pcrj.2009.00046

DO - 10.4104/pcrj.2009.00046

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 52

EP - 56

JO - Primary Care Respiratory Journal

JF - Primary Care Respiratory Journal

SN - 1475-1534

IS - 1

ER -