Development of a clinical multiple-lunge test to predict falls in older adults

Ruth Wagenaar, Justin W. Keogh, Denise Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To develop a new Multiple-Lunge Test to distinguish between fallers and nonfallers in community-dwelling older adults. Design: A cross-sectional design was used to establish the sensitivity and specificity of the test to predict faller status based on retrospective self-reported fall history. Setting: Local retirement villages. Participants: Community-dwelling older adults (N=130; mean age ± SD, 77±7y) with (n=40) and without (n=90) a history of falls. Interventions: The Multiple-Lunge Test required individuals to lunge forward to a step length determined as 60% of their leg length, and return to start, for 5 consecutive repetitions. Interday and intraday test-retest reliability of the Multiple-Lunge Test was established across 2 testing occasions. Main Outcome Measures: Number of steps performed correctly, total time to complete 5 steps. Results: The Multiple-Lunge Test was found to be reliable across trials (Intraday: intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]= .79 -.81 for steps, ICC=.86 -.88 for time; Interday: ICC=.77 for steps; ICC=.84 for time). Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated as 73% and 63%, respectively, for predicting multiple fallers using the measure of all 5 steps done correctly. Conclusions: The test is easily administered and because of its challenging nature, it may be well suited to detect subtle differences in abilities of higher functioning, communitydwelling older adults. A practitioner can be confident in 7 of 10 cases that an older adult who cannot complete all 5 steps of the Multiple-Lunge Test is at high risk of falls. The results suggest that there is potential for the Multiple-Lunge Test to be used in clinical practice; however, additional research on how to further increase its validity appears warranted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)458-465
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume93
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Independent Living
Sensitivity and Specificity
Retirement
Reproducibility of Results
Leg
History
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Research

Cite this

@article{3838602e55a0401c9a9662d1fcd597c4,
title = "Development of a clinical multiple-lunge test to predict falls in older adults",
abstract = "Objective: To develop a new Multiple-Lunge Test to distinguish between fallers and nonfallers in community-dwelling older adults. Design: A cross-sectional design was used to establish the sensitivity and specificity of the test to predict faller status based on retrospective self-reported fall history. Setting: Local retirement villages. Participants: Community-dwelling older adults (N=130; mean age ± SD, 77±7y) with (n=40) and without (n=90) a history of falls. Interventions: The Multiple-Lunge Test required individuals to lunge forward to a step length determined as 60{\%} of their leg length, and return to start, for 5 consecutive repetitions. Interday and intraday test-retest reliability of the Multiple-Lunge Test was established across 2 testing occasions. Main Outcome Measures: Number of steps performed correctly, total time to complete 5 steps. Results: The Multiple-Lunge Test was found to be reliable across trials (Intraday: intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]= .79 -.81 for steps, ICC=.86 -.88 for time; Interday: ICC=.77 for steps; ICC=.84 for time). Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated as 73{\%} and 63{\%}, respectively, for predicting multiple fallers using the measure of all 5 steps done correctly. Conclusions: The test is easily administered and because of its challenging nature, it may be well suited to detect subtle differences in abilities of higher functioning, communitydwelling older adults. A practitioner can be confident in 7 of 10 cases that an older adult who cannot complete all 5 steps of the Multiple-Lunge Test is at high risk of falls. The results suggest that there is potential for the Multiple-Lunge Test to be used in clinical practice; however, additional research on how to further increase its validity appears warranted.",
author = "Ruth Wagenaar and Keogh, {Justin W.} and Denise Taylor",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.044",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
pages = "458--465",
journal = "Archives of physical medicine",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

Development of a clinical multiple-lunge test to predict falls in older adults. / Wagenaar, Ruth; Keogh, Justin W.; Taylor, Denise.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 93, No. 3, 03.2012, p. 458-465.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of a clinical multiple-lunge test to predict falls in older adults

AU - Wagenaar, Ruth

AU - Keogh, Justin W.

AU - Taylor, Denise

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - Objective: To develop a new Multiple-Lunge Test to distinguish between fallers and nonfallers in community-dwelling older adults. Design: A cross-sectional design was used to establish the sensitivity and specificity of the test to predict faller status based on retrospective self-reported fall history. Setting: Local retirement villages. Participants: Community-dwelling older adults (N=130; mean age ± SD, 77±7y) with (n=40) and without (n=90) a history of falls. Interventions: The Multiple-Lunge Test required individuals to lunge forward to a step length determined as 60% of their leg length, and return to start, for 5 consecutive repetitions. Interday and intraday test-retest reliability of the Multiple-Lunge Test was established across 2 testing occasions. Main Outcome Measures: Number of steps performed correctly, total time to complete 5 steps. Results: The Multiple-Lunge Test was found to be reliable across trials (Intraday: intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]= .79 -.81 for steps, ICC=.86 -.88 for time; Interday: ICC=.77 for steps; ICC=.84 for time). Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated as 73% and 63%, respectively, for predicting multiple fallers using the measure of all 5 steps done correctly. Conclusions: The test is easily administered and because of its challenging nature, it may be well suited to detect subtle differences in abilities of higher functioning, communitydwelling older adults. A practitioner can be confident in 7 of 10 cases that an older adult who cannot complete all 5 steps of the Multiple-Lunge Test is at high risk of falls. The results suggest that there is potential for the Multiple-Lunge Test to be used in clinical practice; however, additional research on how to further increase its validity appears warranted.

AB - Objective: To develop a new Multiple-Lunge Test to distinguish between fallers and nonfallers in community-dwelling older adults. Design: A cross-sectional design was used to establish the sensitivity and specificity of the test to predict faller status based on retrospective self-reported fall history. Setting: Local retirement villages. Participants: Community-dwelling older adults (N=130; mean age ± SD, 77±7y) with (n=40) and without (n=90) a history of falls. Interventions: The Multiple-Lunge Test required individuals to lunge forward to a step length determined as 60% of their leg length, and return to start, for 5 consecutive repetitions. Interday and intraday test-retest reliability of the Multiple-Lunge Test was established across 2 testing occasions. Main Outcome Measures: Number of steps performed correctly, total time to complete 5 steps. Results: The Multiple-Lunge Test was found to be reliable across trials (Intraday: intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]= .79 -.81 for steps, ICC=.86 -.88 for time; Interday: ICC=.77 for steps; ICC=.84 for time). Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated as 73% and 63%, respectively, for predicting multiple fallers using the measure of all 5 steps done correctly. Conclusions: The test is easily administered and because of its challenging nature, it may be well suited to detect subtle differences in abilities of higher functioning, communitydwelling older adults. A practitioner can be confident in 7 of 10 cases that an older adult who cannot complete all 5 steps of the Multiple-Lunge Test is at high risk of falls. The results suggest that there is potential for the Multiple-Lunge Test to be used in clinical practice; however, additional research on how to further increase its validity appears warranted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860008998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.044

DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.044

M3 - Article

VL - 93

SP - 458

EP - 465

JO - Archives of physical medicine

JF - Archives of physical medicine

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 3

ER -