Developing physical capability standards that are predictive of success on special forces selection courses

Andrew P. Hunt, Robin M. Orr, Daniel C. Billing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)
28 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study aimed to develop minimum standards for physical capability assessments (vertical jump, sit and reach, push-ups, seven-stage sit-ups, heaves, agility, 20-m shuttle run, loaded 5-km pack march, and 400-m swim) that candidates must pass before they can commence Australian Army Special Forces (SF) selection courses. Soldiers (Part A: n = 104; Part B: n = 92) completed the physical capability assessments before commencing a SF selection course. At the beginning of these selection courses, participants attempted two barrier assessments (3.2-km battle run and 20-km march). Statistical analysis revealed several physical capability assessments were associated with performance on the barrier assessments and selection course outcome (Part A); however, these statistical models were unable to correctly classify all candidates as likely to pass or fail the selection course. Alternatively, manual analysis identified a combination of physical capability standards that correctly classified 14% to 18% of candidates likely to fail, without excluding any candidates able to pass (Part A). The standards were applied and refined through Part B and included completing the 5-km pack march in ≤45:45 minutes: seconds, achieving ≥level five on the sit-up test, or completing ≥66 push-ups. Implementation of these standards may reduce attrition rates and enhance the efficiency of the SF recruitment process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)619-624
Number of pages6
JournalMilitary Medicine
Volume178
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Military Personnel
Statistical Models

Cite this

@article{c10349200f10480d85ff57eaed367e54,
title = "Developing physical capability standards that are predictive of success on special forces selection courses",
abstract = "This study aimed to develop minimum standards for physical capability assessments (vertical jump, sit and reach, push-ups, seven-stage sit-ups, heaves, agility, 20-m shuttle run, loaded 5-km pack march, and 400-m swim) that candidates must pass before they can commence Australian Army Special Forces (SF) selection courses. Soldiers (Part A: n = 104; Part B: n = 92) completed the physical capability assessments before commencing a SF selection course. At the beginning of these selection courses, participants attempted two barrier assessments (3.2-km battle run and 20-km march). Statistical analysis revealed several physical capability assessments were associated with performance on the barrier assessments and selection course outcome (Part A); however, these statistical models were unable to correctly classify all candidates as likely to pass or fail the selection course. Alternatively, manual analysis identified a combination of physical capability standards that correctly classified 14{\%} to 18{\%} of candidates likely to fail, without excluding any candidates able to pass (Part A). The standards were applied and refined through Part B and included completing the 5-km pack march in ≤45:45 minutes: seconds, achieving ≥level five on the sit-up test, or completing ≥66 push-ups. Implementation of these standards may reduce attrition rates and enhance the efficiency of the SF recruitment process.",
author = "Hunt, {Andrew P.} and Orr, {Robin M.} and Billing, {Daniel C.}",
note = "This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Military Medicine following peer review. The version of record Hunt, A. P., Orr, R. M., & Billing, D. C. (2013). Developing physical capability standards that are predictive of success on special forces selection courses. Military Medicine, 178(6), 619-624. DOI: 10.7205/MILMED-D-12-00347 is available online at: https://academic.oup.com/milmed/article/178/6/619/4320198 https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-12-00347",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.7205/MILMED-D-12-00347",
language = "English",
volume = "178",
pages = "619--624",
journal = "Military Medicine",
issn = "0026-4075",
publisher = "Association of Military Surgeons of the US",
number = "6",

}

Developing physical capability standards that are predictive of success on special forces selection courses. / Hunt, Andrew P.; Orr, Robin M.; Billing, Daniel C.

In: Military Medicine, Vol. 178, No. 6, 06.2013, p. 619-624.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing physical capability standards that are predictive of success on special forces selection courses

AU - Hunt, Andrew P.

AU - Orr, Robin M.

AU - Billing, Daniel C.

N1 - This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Military Medicine following peer review. The version of record Hunt, A. P., Orr, R. M., & Billing, D. C. (2013). Developing physical capability standards that are predictive of success on special forces selection courses. Military Medicine, 178(6), 619-624. DOI: 10.7205/MILMED-D-12-00347 is available online at: https://academic.oup.com/milmed/article/178/6/619/4320198 https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-12-00347

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - This study aimed to develop minimum standards for physical capability assessments (vertical jump, sit and reach, push-ups, seven-stage sit-ups, heaves, agility, 20-m shuttle run, loaded 5-km pack march, and 400-m swim) that candidates must pass before they can commence Australian Army Special Forces (SF) selection courses. Soldiers (Part A: n = 104; Part B: n = 92) completed the physical capability assessments before commencing a SF selection course. At the beginning of these selection courses, participants attempted two barrier assessments (3.2-km battle run and 20-km march). Statistical analysis revealed several physical capability assessments were associated with performance on the barrier assessments and selection course outcome (Part A); however, these statistical models were unable to correctly classify all candidates as likely to pass or fail the selection course. Alternatively, manual analysis identified a combination of physical capability standards that correctly classified 14% to 18% of candidates likely to fail, without excluding any candidates able to pass (Part A). The standards were applied and refined through Part B and included completing the 5-km pack march in ≤45:45 minutes: seconds, achieving ≥level five on the sit-up test, or completing ≥66 push-ups. Implementation of these standards may reduce attrition rates and enhance the efficiency of the SF recruitment process.

AB - This study aimed to develop minimum standards for physical capability assessments (vertical jump, sit and reach, push-ups, seven-stage sit-ups, heaves, agility, 20-m shuttle run, loaded 5-km pack march, and 400-m swim) that candidates must pass before they can commence Australian Army Special Forces (SF) selection courses. Soldiers (Part A: n = 104; Part B: n = 92) completed the physical capability assessments before commencing a SF selection course. At the beginning of these selection courses, participants attempted two barrier assessments (3.2-km battle run and 20-km march). Statistical analysis revealed several physical capability assessments were associated with performance on the barrier assessments and selection course outcome (Part A); however, these statistical models were unable to correctly classify all candidates as likely to pass or fail the selection course. Alternatively, manual analysis identified a combination of physical capability standards that correctly classified 14% to 18% of candidates likely to fail, without excluding any candidates able to pass (Part A). The standards were applied and refined through Part B and included completing the 5-km pack march in ≤45:45 minutes: seconds, achieving ≥level five on the sit-up test, or completing ≥66 push-ups. Implementation of these standards may reduce attrition rates and enhance the efficiency of the SF recruitment process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878862802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7205/MILMED-D-12-00347

DO - 10.7205/MILMED-D-12-00347

M3 - Article

VL - 178

SP - 619

EP - 624

JO - Military Medicine

JF - Military Medicine

SN - 0026-4075

IS - 6

ER -