Developing a basis for global reciprocity: Negotiating between the many standards for project management

Lynn Crawford, Julien Pollack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Professional standards are a significant issue for professions such as IT and Project Management, where certification and licensure are either necessary to practice or to demonstrate individual competence and capability. In many professions there is no basis for international reciprocity of professional standards. This paper documents the development of a standard for global reciprocity between already existing professional standards in the field of Project Management. Data are based on personal involvement by the authors and interviews with participants. This discussion addresses different approaches to standardisation, how common issues in the standardisation process have been addressed, and how the hindering influence of the professional associations 'proprietorial interest was avoided. Significantly different standards of development processes have been used compared to those typical in Project Management standards development, including: an emphasis on negotiation and joint modification rather than market dominance, and an open access approach, rather than one based on exclusion and gate-keeping.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)70-84
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research
Volume6
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Project management
Standardization
Professional standards
Negotiating

Cite this

@article{08db99f15a3c4e7fb005d798fbd56e21,
title = "Developing a basis for global reciprocity: Negotiating between the many standards for project management",
abstract = "Professional standards are a significant issue for professions such as IT and Project Management, where certification and licensure are either necessary to practice or to demonstrate individual competence and capability. In many professions there is no basis for international reciprocity of professional standards. This paper documents the development of a standard for global reciprocity between already existing professional standards in the field of Project Management. Data are based on personal involvement by the authors and interviews with participants. This discussion addresses different approaches to standardisation, how common issues in the standardisation process have been addressed, and how the hindering influence of the professional associations 'proprietorial interest was avoided. Significantly different standards of development processes have been used compared to those typical in Project Management standards development, including: an emphasis on negotiation and joint modification rather than market dominance, and an open access approach, rather than one based on exclusion and gate-keeping.",
author = "Lynn Crawford and Julien Pollack",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "70--84",
journal = "International Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research",
issn = "1539-3054",
publisher = "IGI Publishing",
number = "1",

}

Developing a basis for global reciprocity : Negotiating between the many standards for project management. / Crawford, Lynn; Pollack, Julien.

In: International Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, 01.2008, p. 70-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing a basis for global reciprocity

T2 - Negotiating between the many standards for project management

AU - Crawford, Lynn

AU - Pollack, Julien

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - Professional standards are a significant issue for professions such as IT and Project Management, where certification and licensure are either necessary to practice or to demonstrate individual competence and capability. In many professions there is no basis for international reciprocity of professional standards. This paper documents the development of a standard for global reciprocity between already existing professional standards in the field of Project Management. Data are based on personal involvement by the authors and interviews with participants. This discussion addresses different approaches to standardisation, how common issues in the standardisation process have been addressed, and how the hindering influence of the professional associations 'proprietorial interest was avoided. Significantly different standards of development processes have been used compared to those typical in Project Management standards development, including: an emphasis on negotiation and joint modification rather than market dominance, and an open access approach, rather than one based on exclusion and gate-keeping.

AB - Professional standards are a significant issue for professions such as IT and Project Management, where certification and licensure are either necessary to practice or to demonstrate individual competence and capability. In many professions there is no basis for international reciprocity of professional standards. This paper documents the development of a standard for global reciprocity between already existing professional standards in the field of Project Management. Data are based on personal involvement by the authors and interviews with participants. This discussion addresses different approaches to standardisation, how common issues in the standardisation process have been addressed, and how the hindering influence of the professional associations 'proprietorial interest was avoided. Significantly different standards of development processes have been used compared to those typical in Project Management standards development, including: an emphasis on negotiation and joint modification rather than market dominance, and an open access approach, rather than one based on exclusion and gate-keeping.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=47649084424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 70

EP - 84

JO - International Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research

JF - International Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research

SN - 1539-3054

IS - 1

ER -